MENTAL WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT USING A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA METHOD

被引:9
|
作者
Eraslan, Ergue [1 ]
Can, Guelin Feryal [1 ]
Atalay, Kumru Didem [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Ankara, Turkey
来源
TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE | 2016年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
fuzzy multi-criteria assessment; MCH; NASA-TLX; subjective mental workload; SWAT; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.17559/TV-20140401112509
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The workload factors for labor-intensive works of employees are always taken into account in measuring workloads. However, with the introduction of computers to work planning and coordination, the tasks have often begun to take on mental workload. Mental workload is encountered in academic studies in relatively high prevalence. In this regard, it is important to examine the efficiency of scientific studies to support the academic, administrative, and technical staff of a faculty. Many methods having certain disadvantages are available in the literature which is either conflicting or complementary to each other. Therefore, an integrated mental workload assessment method is needed. In this study, a new hierarchical method was proposed and by help of a scale developed, taking the subjective techniques (MCH, SWAT, NASA-TLX) into account, the faculty staff was holistically assessed in a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making processes. The subjects were selected in an engineering school at a private university. Four risk categories are defined that contain homogenous risk scores. At the end of the study, some ergonomic regulations are recommended to the persons/departments at high risk categories to reduce mental workloads.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 674
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Distribution System Restoration Using Fuzzy Multi-criteria Evaluation
    Mehfuz, Shabana
    Kumar, Pramod
    Reetu
    2014 INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON POWER, ENERGY AND CONTROLS WITH THEIR IMPACT ON HUMANITY (CIPECH), 2014, : 253 - 256
  • [42] Modeling multi-criteria objective functions using fuzzy measures
    Yager, Ronald R.
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2016, 29 : 105 - 111
  • [43] Professor Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Hein, Nelson
    Kroenke, Adriana
    Rodrigues Junior, Moacir Manoel
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, ITQM 2015, 2015, 55 : 539 - 548
  • [44] Fuzzy multi-criteria acceptability analysis: A new approach to multi-criteria decision analysis under fuzzy environment
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Korobov, Alexander
    Martinez, L.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 84 : 262 - 271
  • [45] An empirical study on using multi-criteria decision making method in enterprise to adopt RFID assessment criteria
    Wu, Chao-Yen
    Sun, Koun-Tem
    Chan, Hsin-Te
    BioTechnology: An Indian Journal, 2013, 8 (10) : 1404 - 1411
  • [46] Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method
    Memari, Ashkan
    Dargi, Ahmad
    Jokar, Mohammad Reza Akbari
    Ahmad, Robiah
    Rahim, Abd Rahman Abdul
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2019, 50 : 9 - 24
  • [47] Fuzzy multi-criteria optimization based on fuzzy relations
    Ramik, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL 1 & 2, 2002, : 1263 - 1268
  • [48] A new method to obtain fuzzy Pareto set of fuzzy multi-criteria optimization problems
    Ghosh, Debdas
    Chakraborty, Debjani
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2014, 26 (03) : 1223 - 1234
  • [49] Evaluating the service quality of airports in Thailand using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method
    Pandey, Mukesh Mohan
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 57 : 241 - 249
  • [50] FUZZY EXTENSION OF THE CODAS METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA MARKET SEGMENT EVALUATION
    Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Hooshmand, Reyhaneh
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 18 (01) : 1 - 19