Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial

被引:254
|
作者
Dearnaley, David [1 ,2 ]
Syndikus, Isabel [3 ]
Sumo, Georges [2 ]
Bidmead, Margaret [1 ]
Bloomfield, David [4 ]
Clark, Catharine [5 ]
Gao, Annie [2 ]
Hassan, Shama [2 ]
Horwich, Alan [1 ,2 ]
Huddart, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Khoo, Vincent [1 ,2 ]
Kirkbride, Peter [10 ]
Mayles, Helen [3 ]
Mayles, Philip [3 ]
Naismith, Olivia [1 ]
Parker, Chris [1 ]
Patterson, Helen [6 ]
Russell, Martin [7 ]
Scrase, Christopher [8 ]
South, Chris [1 ]
Staffurth, John [9 ]
Hall, Emma [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] Inst Canc Res, London SW3 6JB, England
[3] Clatterbridge Ctr Oncol NHS Fdn Trust, Wirral, Merseyside, England
[4] Brighton & Sussex Univ Hosp, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[5] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, Guildford, Surrey, England
[6] Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge, England
[7] Beatson W Scotland Canc Ctr, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[8] Ipswich Hosp, Ipswich, Suffolk, England
[9] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[10] Sheffield Teaching Hosp Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
来源
LANCET ONCOLOGY | 2012年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; ALPHA/BETA RATIO; ESCALATION TRIAL; FRACTIONATION; CARCINOMA; METAANALYSIS; ADENOCARCINOMA; TOXICITY; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70293-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Prostate cancer might have high radiation-fraction sensitivity, implying a therapeutic advantage of hypofractionated treatment. We present a pre-planned preliminary safety analysis of side-effects in stages 1 and 2 of a randomised trial comparing standard and hypofractionated radiotherapy. Methods We did a multicentre, randomised study and recruited men with localised prostate cancer between Oct 18, 2002, and Aug 12, 2006, at 11 UK centres. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive conventional or hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radio therapy, and all were given with 3-6 months of neoadjuvant androgen suppression. Computer-generated random permuted blocks were used, with risk of seminal vesicle involvement and radiotherapy-treatment centre as stratification factors. The conventional schedule was 37 fractions of 2 Gy to a total of 74 Gy. The two hypofractionated schedules involved 3 Gy treatments given in either 20 fractions to a total of 60 Gy, or 19 fractions to a total of 57 Gy. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients with grade 2 or worse toxicity at 2 years on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. The primary analysis included all patients who had received at least one fraction of radiotherapy and completed a 2 year assessment. Treatment allocation was not masked and clinicians were not blinded. Stage 3 of this trial completed the planned recruitment in June, 2011. This study is registered, number ISRCTN97182923. Findings 153 men recruited to stages 1 and 2 were randomly assigned to receive conventional treatment of 74 Gy, 153 to receive 60 Gy, and 151 to receive 57 Gy. With 50.5 months median follow-up (IQR 43.5-61.3), six (4.3%; 95% CI 1.6-9.2) of 138 men in the 74 Gy group had bowel toxicity of grade 2 or worse on the RTOG scale at 2 years, as did five (3.6%; 1.2-8.3) of 137 men in the 60 Gy group, and two (1.4%; 0.2-5.0) of 143 men in the 57 Gy group. For bladder toxicities, three (2.2%; 0.5-6.2) of 138 men, three (2.2%; 0.5-6.3) of 137, and none (0.0%; 97.5% CI 0.0-2.6) of 143 had scores of grade 2 or worse on the RTOG scale at 2 years. Interpretation Hypofractionated high-dose radiotherapy seems equally well tolerated as conventionally fractionated treatment at 2 years.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hypofractionated Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Study
    Kubo, Nobuteru
    Kawamura, Hidemasa
    Oike, Takahiro
    Sato, Hiro
    Iwanaga, Mototaro
    Mizukami, Tatsuji
    Adachi, Akiko
    Matsui, Hiroshi
    Ito, Kazuto
    Suzuki, Kazuhiro
    Nakano, Takashi
    IN VIVO, 2019, 33 (04): : 1235 - 1241
  • [32] Dose Escalation Using a Hypofractionated, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Boost for Localized Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Results Addressing Concerns of High or Low α/β Ratio
    Shridhar, Ravi
    Bolton, Sue
    Joiner, Michael C.
    Forman, Jeffrey D.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2009, 7 (03) : E52 - E57
  • [33] Skin Toxicity in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Field-In-Field Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus Helical Inverse Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: Results of a Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial
    Joseph, K.
    Vos, L. J.
    Gabos, Z.
    Pervez, N.
    Chafe, S.
    Tankel, K.
    Warkentin, H.
    Ghosh, S.
    Amanie, J.
    Powell, K.
    Polkosnik, L-A
    Horsman, S.
    MacKenzie, M.
    Sabri, S.
    Parliament, M. B.
    Mackey, J.
    Abdulkarim, B.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [34] Prospective evaluation of quality of life 54 months after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Goineau, Aurore
    Marchand, Virginie
    Rigaud, Jerome
    Bourdin, Sylvain
    Rio, Emmanuel
    Campion, Loic
    Bonnaud-Antignac, Angelique
    Mahe, Marc-Andre
    Supiot, Stephane
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [35] Prospective evaluation of quality of life 54 months after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Aurore Goineau
    Virginie Marchand
    Jérome Rigaud
    Sylvain Bourdin
    Emmanuel Rio
    Loic Campion
    Angélique Bonnaud-Antignac
    Marc-André Mahé
    Stéphane Supiot
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [36] Hypofractionated Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost after Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Results of a Phase II Trial
    Massaccesi, Mariangela
    Cilla, Savino
    Deodato, Francesco
    Digesu, Cinzia
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Caravatta, Luciana
    Ippolito, Edy
    Picardi, Vincenzo
    Ferro, Marica
    Mignogna, Samantha
    Mattiucci, Gian Carlo
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Piermattei, Angelo
    Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (06) : 2785 - 2789
  • [37] Dosimetric and efficiency comparison of high-dose radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: volumetric modulated arc therapy versus fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Lin, C. -Y.
    Huang, W. -Y.
    Jen, Y. -M.
    Chen, C. -M.
    Su, Y. -F.
    Chao, H. -L.
    Lin, C. -S.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2014, 27 (06) : 585 - 590
  • [38] IMAGE-GUIDED INTENSITY MODULATED HYPOFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY IN HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS: TOXICITY AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS
    Valeriani, Maurizio
    Bonome, Paolo
    Osti, Mattia Falchetto
    De Sanctis, Vitaliana
    Bracci, Stefano
    Agolli, Linda
    Enrici, Riccardo Maurizi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (06) : 3702 - 3702
  • [39] Whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer: a preliminary report
    Joo, Ji Hyeon
    Kim, Yeon Joo
    Kim, Young Seok
    Choi, Eun Kyung
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Lee, Sang-wook
    Song, Si Yeol
    Yoon, Sang Min
    Kim, Su Ssan
    Park, Jin-hong
    Jeong, Yuri
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    Lee, Jae-Lyun
    Do Ahn, Seung
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 31 (04): : 199 - 205
  • [40] A comparison of sexual function following radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Results of a prospective, randomized trial of hypofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Buyyounouski, M. K.
    Li, T.
    Watkins-Bruner, D.
    Horwitz, E. M.
    Pollack, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S7 - S8