Consent in paecliatric research:: an evaluation of the guidance provided in the 2007 NHMRC National statement on ethical conduct in human research

被引:16
|
作者
Spriggs, Merle P. [1 ]
Gillam, Lynn H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat Hlth, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01655.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In 2007, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) released a revised National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Public submissions in the review process leading to the 2007 statement highlighted four main areas of concern: children's competence to consent, mature minors and the requirement for parental consent, whether children can refuse to participate, and the provision of information to children. A useful addition to the statement is the concept of levels of maturity, which help determine whether a child or young person's consent is necessary and/or sufficient for participation in research. Changes in terminology ("capacity" instead of "competence" and introduction of the term "vulnerability") have the potential to create confusion, as the new terms are not clearly defined, and capacity is used in several senses.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 362
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ethical Orientation to Conduct Research Involving Human Participants During COVID-19 Outbreak
    Ramirez, Karol
    ODOVTOS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 23 (01) : 8 - 9
  • [32] Mind the gap: Griffith University's approach to the governance of ethical conduct in human research.
    Allen G.
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2007, 26 (1-2) : 57 - 67
  • [33] Informed consent: Ethical issues for pathologists when banking human tissue for clinical research.
    Rasmussen, KE
    Murphy, JS
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2005, 7 (05): : 697 - 697
  • [34] Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices A Review
    Hendriks, Saskia
    Grady, Christine
    Ramos, Khara M.
    Chiong, Winston
    Fins, Joseph J.
    Ford, Paul
    Goering, Sara
    Greely, Henry T.
    Hutchison, Katrina
    Kelly, Michael L.
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    Klein, Eran
    Lisanby, Sarah H.
    Mayberg, Helen
    Maslen, Hannah
    Miller, Franklin G.
    Rommelfanger, Karen
    Sheth, Sameer A.
    Wexler, Anna
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2019, 76 (12) : 1506 - 1514
  • [35] Impact evaluation, advocacy and ethical research: some issues for national strategy development?
    Streatfield, David
    Markless, Sharon
    LIBRARY REVIEW, 2011, 60 (04) : 312 - 327
  • [36] Highlights of Indian Council of Medical Research National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants
    Mathur, Roli
    Thakur, Kalyani
    Hazam, Rajib Kishore
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 51 (03) : 214 - 221
  • [37] The argument from normative uncertainty and the ethical evaluation of human embryo research
    Zuradzki, Tomasz
    DIAMETROS, 2012, 32 : 131 - 159
  • [38] Informed Consent Template and Guidelines on the Ethical Practice in Human Genetics and Human Genomic Research; Initiatives of the Universiti Sains Malaysia
    Sasongko, Teguh Haryo
    Zabidi-Hussin, Zamh
    Othman, Nor Hayati
    Van Rostenberghe, Hans
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 22 (06): : 47 - 53
  • [39] National ethical guidelines for biomedical & health research involving human participants, 2017: A commentary
    Mathur, Roli
    Swaminathan, Soumya
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 148 (03) : 279 - 283
  • [40] Enhancing Academic Quality and Collegial Control: Insights from US Policy on the Ethical Conduct of Human Subjects’ Research
    David D. Dill
    Higher Education Policy, 2020, 33 : 45 - 64