Is there a role for positron emission tomography imaging in the early evaluation of prostate cancer relapse?

被引:11
|
作者
Greco, C. [1 ]
Cascini, G. L. [2 ]
Tamburrini, O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Div Radiat Oncol, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
[2] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Dept Radiol Nucl Med, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
关键词
prostate cancer; biochemical relapse; PET/CT; F-18-FDG; C-11-acetate; C-11-choline;
D O I
10.1038/sj.pcan.4501028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The patient population with a rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) post-therapy with no evidence of disease on standard imaging studies currently represents the second largest group of prostate cancer patients. Little information is still available regarding the specificity and sensitivity of positron emission tomography ( PET) tracers in the assessment of early biochemical recurrence. Ideally, PET imaging would allow one to accurately discriminate between local vs nodal vs distant relapse, thus enabling appropriate selection of patients for salvage local therapy. The vast majority of studies show a relatively poor yield of positive scans with PSA values <4 ng ml(-1). So far, no tracer has been shown to be able to detect local recurrence within the clinically useful 1 ng ml(-1) PSA threshold, clearly limiting the use of PET imaging in the post-surgical setting. Preliminary evidence, however, suggests that 11 C-choline PET may be useful in selecting out patients with early biochemical relapse (PSA < 2 ng ml(-1)) who have pelvic nodal oligometastasis potentially amenable to local treatment. The role of PET imaging in prostate cancer is gradually evolving but still remains within the experimental realm. Well-conducted studies comparing the merits of different tracers are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improved imaging and the clinician: The the role of positron emission tomography in the management of colorectal cancer
    Hecht, JR
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 6 (04) : 208 - 213
  • [42] Evaluation of esophageal cancer by positron emission tomography
    Himeno, S
    Yasuda, S
    Shimada, H
    Tajima, T
    Makuuchi, H
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 32 (09) : 340 - 346
  • [43] The role of positron emission tomography imaging in movement disorders
    Bohnen, NI
    Frey, KA
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 13 (04) : 791 - +
  • [44] Role of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Myeloid Sarcoma
    Sahu, Kamal Kant
    Thakur, Kamia
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (01): : 90 - 90
  • [45] Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of germ cell tumours at relapse
    S F Hain
    M J O'Doherty
    A R Timothy
    M D Leslie
    P G Harper
    R A Huddart
    British Journal of Cancer, 2000, 83 : 863 - 869
  • [46] Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of germ cell tumours at relapse
    Hain, SF
    O'Doherty, MJ
    Timothy, AR
    Leslie, MD
    Harper, PG
    Huddart, RA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (07) : 863 - 869
  • [47] POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AND ITS ROLE IN METABOLIC IMAGING
    GRAHAM, MM
    LEWELLEN, TK
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1989, 64 (06) : 725 - 727
  • [48] The role of Positron Emission Tomography in the management of prostate cancer: our experience at the Austin Hospital
    Chu, K.
    Bolton, D.
    Scott, A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 : 19 - 19
  • [49] PROSTATE CANCER AND EARLY BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE: WHICH IS THE ROLE OF GALLIUM-68-PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY?
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    De Luca, Stefano
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Alleva, Giorgio
    Garrou, Diletta
    Amparore, Daniele
    Bollito, Enrico
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (04) : 2571 - 2571
  • [50] Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging analogs of glutamine: Development and evaluation as probes for cancer imaging
    Buck, Jason R.
    Saleh, Sam
    Hight, Matthew R.
    Nickels, Mike L.
    Manning, H. Charles
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72