Dual-Source Parallel RF Transmission for Clinical MR Imaging of the Spine at 3.0 T: Intraindividual Comparison with Conventional Single-Source Transmission

被引:49
|
作者
Nelles, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Koenig, Roy S. [1 ,2 ]
Gieseke, Juergen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guerand-van Battum, Marjolijn M. [4 ]
Kukuk, Guido M. [1 ,2 ]
Schild, Hans H. [1 ,2 ]
Willinek, Winfried A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn Hosp, Dept Radiol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Sch Med, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[3] Philips Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands
关键词
EXCITATION; EXPERIENCE; ARTIFACTS; SENSE; COIL;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.10092146
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively and intraindividually compare single-source radiofrequency (RF) excitation and dual-source parallel RF excitation in 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the spine. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and written informed patient consent were obtained. The RF power of a 3.0-T MR imaging system was distributed to two ports of the body coil of the system by using independent RF transmit channels. The maximum B 1 field strength for dual-source parallel RF excitation was maintained, as compared with single-source RF excitation. The repetition time was reduced according to the revised RF setup with dual-source parallel RF excitation while maintaining specific energy absorption limitations. Thirty patients were examined with and without dual-source parallel RF excitation. Diagnostic quality was assessed independently by two radiologists according to a four-point grading system. Image contrast ratios (CRs) were calculated between reference tissues and vertebrae for single-source RF excitation and dual-source parallel RF excitation. Results: The mean acceleration achieved with dual-source parallel RF excitation was 36% (range, 18%-50%). The total imaging duration of a three-station total spinal examination was reduced by one-third by using dual-source parallel RF transmission. For all cases investigated, diagnostic image quality without significant differences between the two methods and with a good interobserver agreement was achieved (Kendall tau-b, 0.50-0.84). The observed image contrast changes were predominantly small (<0.10 in 15 of 24 CRs), though they were significantly different (P < .05). Conclusion: While shortening examination times by approximately one-third, the dual-source parallel RF transmission mode in MR imaging of the spine yielded diagnostic image quality comparable to that with the conventional single-source RF transmission mode. (C)RSNA, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 753
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Dual-Source Radiofrequency Transmission on Left Ventricular Measurements and Measurement Reproducibility at 3.0 T Cardiac MR Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Single-Source Transmission Reference
    Li, Chunhai
    Liu, Bo
    Meng, Hong
    Wang, Guangbin
    Wang, Cuiyan
    Jia, Haipeng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) : E56 - E66
  • [2] Comparison of dual-source parallel radio frequency transmission liver MRI at 3.0 T with conventional MRI
    Luo, Z-R
    Wang, D.
    Sun, X-L
    Wang, G-K
    Zhuang, X. J.
    Shen, B-Z
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2013, 104 (06) : 583 - 592
  • [3] Dual-source parallel RF transmission for diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen using different b values: Image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient comparison with conventional single-source transmission
    Guo, Lijun
    Liu, Cheng
    Chen, Weibo
    Chan, Queenie
    Wang, Guangbin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (04) : 875 - 885
  • [4] Cardiac MOLLI T1 mapping at 3.0 T: comparison of patient-adaptive dual-source RF and conventional RF transmission
    Michael Rasper
    Jonathan Nadjiri
    Alexandra S. Sträter
    Marcus Settles
    Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz
    Ernst J. Rummeny
    Armin M. Huber
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2017, 33 : 889 - 897
  • [5] Cardiac MOLLI T1 mapping at 3.0 T: comparison of patient-adaptive dual-source RF and conventional RF transmission
    Rasper, Michael
    Nadjiri, Jonathan
    Straeter, Alexandra S.
    Settles, Marcus
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Huber, Armin M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 33 (06): : 889 - 897
  • [6] Liver MRI at 3.0 Tesla: Comparison of Image Quality and Lesion Detectability Between Single-Source Conventional and Dual-Source Parallel Radiofrequency Transmissions
    Hwang, Jiyoung
    Kim, Young Kon
    Park, Min Jung
    Lee, Mi Hee
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Lee, Won Jae
    Choi, Dongil
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (05) : 546 - 553
  • [7] Breast MR Imaging at 3 T with Dual-Source Radiofrequency Transmission Offers Superior B1 Homogeneity: An Intraindividual Comparison with Breast MR Imaging at 1.5 T
    Trop, Isabelle
    Gilbert, Guillaume
    Ivancevic, Marko K.
    Beaudoin, Gilles
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) : 602 - 608
  • [8] Dual-Source Parallel Radiofrequency Excitation Body MR Imaging Compared with Standard MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Initial Clinical Experience
    Willinek, Winfried A.
    Gieseke, Juergen
    Kukuk, Guido M.
    Nelles, Michael
    Koenig, Roy
    Morakkabati-Spitz, Nuschin
    Traeber, Frank
    Thomas, Daniel
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Schild, Hans H.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (03) : 966 - 975
  • [9] Dual-source RF transmission in cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 T: systematic spatial evaluation of image quality improvement compared to conventional RF transmission
    Rasper, Michael
    Gramer, Bettina M.
    Settles, Marcus
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Ibrahim, Tareq
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Huber, Armin
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (02) : 231 - 236
  • [10] Liver: Segment-specific Analysis of B 1 Field Homogeneity at 3.0-T MR Imaging with Single-Source versus Dual-Source Parallel Radiofrequency Excitation
    Pazahr, Shila
    Fischer, Michael Alexander
    Chuck, Natalie
    Luechinger, Roger
    Schick, Fritz
    Nanz, Daniel
    Boss, Andreas
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (02) : 591 - 599