Citizen participation in collaborative watershed partnerships

被引:73
|
作者
Koehler, Brandi [1 ]
Koontz, Tomas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
citizen participation; collaborative watershed management; stakeholder partnership; volunteering;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-007-9040-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Collaborative efforts are increasingly being used to address complex environmental problems, both in the United States and abroad. This is especially true in the growing field of collaborative watershed management, where diverse stakeholders work together to develop and advance water-quality goals. Active citizen participation is viewed as a key component, yet groups often struggle to attract and maintain citizen engagement. This study examined citizen participation behavior in collaborative watershed partnerships by way of a written survey administered to citizen members of 12 collaborative watershed groups in Ohio. Results for the determination of who joins such groups were consistent with the dominant-status model of participation because group members were not demographically representative of the broader community. The dominant-status model, however, does not explain which members are more likely to actively participate in group activities. Instead, individual characteristics, including political activity, knowledge, and comfort in sharing opinions with others, were positively correlated with active participation. In addition, group characteristics, including government-based membership, rural location, perceptions of open communication, perceptions that the group has enough technical support to accomplish its goals, and perceived homogeneity of participant opinions, were positively correlated with active participation. Overall, many group members did not actively participate in group activities.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COORDINATION AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    TUCKER, DJ
    SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1980, 54 (01) : 13 - 30
  • [42] LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    ARNSTEIN, SR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04): : 216 - 224
  • [43] THE ONLINE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    Csabai Lucia
    CIVIL SZEMLE, 2015, 12 (04): : 71 - 88
  • [44] CITIZEN PARTICIPATION RECONSIDERED
    BENZ, LN
    SOCIAL WORK, 1975, 20 (02) : 115 - 119
  • [45] Citizen Participation in Health
    Roldan Marquez, Adela
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SOCIOLOGIA, 2012, 17 : 197 - 198
  • [46] Citizen participation and citizen evaluation in disaster recovery
    Kweit, MG
    Kweit, RW
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2004, 34 (04): : 354 - 373
  • [47] CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PLANNING
    GROVE, JL
    PROCTER, SC
    JOURNAL OF TOWN PLANNING INSTITUTE, 1966, 52 (10): : 414 - 416
  • [48] CITIZEN PARTICIPATION STRATEGIES
    BURKE, EM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1968, 34 (05): : 287 - 294
  • [49] Citizen participation in health
    Duro Martinez, Juan Carlos
    PRAXIS SOCIOLOGICA, 2012, (16): : 172 - 173
  • [50] GAMES FOR CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    LAWYONE, H
    SIMULATION & GAMING, 1982, 13 (01) : 51 - 62