Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:93
|
作者
Providencia, Rui [1 ]
Elliott, Perry [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Kiran [2 ]
McCready, Jack [3 ]
Babu, Girish [1 ]
Srinivasan, Neil [1 ,2 ]
Bronis, Kostantinos [1 ]
Papageorgiou, Nikolaos [1 ,2 ]
Chow, Anthony [1 ]
Rowland, Edward [1 ]
Lowe, Martin [1 ]
Segal, Oliver R. [1 ]
Lambiase, Pier D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Barts Heart Ctr, London, England
[2] UCL, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, London, England
[3] Brighton & Sussex Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Royal Sussex Cty Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Brighton, E Sussex, England
关键词
PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; HEART-ASSOCIATION; TASK-FORCE; IMPACT; VULNERABILITY; DYSFUNCTION; PREVALENCE; PREDICTORS; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309406
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is associated with a high risk of stroke. The efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in this setting is poorly characterised. We aimed to systematically review the existing literature and to perform a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HCM. Methods Random-effects meta-analysis of studies comparing HCM versus non-HCM controls. The outcomes of freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia, and acute procedure-related complications were assessed. Studies were searched on MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE and clinicaltrials.gov. Results Fourteen studies were considered eligible for the systematic review, of which five were included in the meta-analysis. Freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia relapse was higher in patients without HCM (after a single procedure: 38.7% HCM vs 49.8% controls, OR=2.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.64, p=0.03; after 1 procedure: 51.8% HCM vs 71.2% controls, OR=2.62, 95% CI 1.52 to 4.51, p=0.0006; I-2=33% and 26%, respectively). Risk of procedure-related adverse events was low. Repeat procedures (mean difference=0.16, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.32, p=0.05, I-2=53%) and antiarrhythmic drugs (OR=4.70, 95% CI 2.31 to 9.55, p<0.0001, I-2=0%) are more frequently needed in patients with HCM to prevent arrhythmia relapse. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the outcome in patients with HCM with less dilated atria and paroxysmal AF may be more comparable to the general population. Conclusions The observed complication rate of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HCM was low. Even though the risk of relapse is twofold higher, catheter ablation can be effective in patients with HCM and AF, particularly in patients with paroxysmal AF and smaller atria.
引用
收藏
页码:1533 / 1543
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Convergent ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shrestha, Suvash
    Kiser, Andy
    DeLurgio, David
    Greenberg, Yisachar
    Yang, Felix
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (03) : 772 - 773
  • [42] Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Costa, Thomaz Alexandre
    Felix, Nicole
    Clemente, Mariana
    Teixeira, Larissa
    Braga, Marcelo Antonio Pinheiro
    Silva, Livia Teixeira Martins
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 67 (01) : 211 - 219
  • [43] The optimal anticoagulation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhao, Y.
    Fang, Z.
    Liu, L.
    Lu, Y.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2020, 189 : 157 - 158
  • [44] Comparison of the Different Anesthesia Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pang, Naidong
    Gao, Jia
    Zhang, Nan
    Zhang, Binghang
    Wang, Rui
    CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 2022
  • [45] Clinical Outcomes of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Younger Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rathore, Sawai Singh
    Farrukh, Ameer
    Yao, Sem Josue Nsanh
    Corrales, Vanessa Vidaurre
    Wint, Zario
    Al Shyyab, Ibrahim
    Goyal, Aman
    Jain, Hritvik
    Kumar, Ashish
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [46] Epicardial thoracoscopic ablation versus endocardial catheter ablation for management of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Hyun Jung
    Kim, Jin Suk
    Kim, Tae Sik
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 22 (06) : 729 - 737
  • [47] OUTCOMES OF CATHETER ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY
    Garg, Lohit
    Sabzwari, Syed Rafay Ali
    Akbar, Ghulam
    Ayele, Hiwot
    Agrawal, Sahil
    Agarwal, Manyoo
    Gordon, Jeffrey
    Dusaj, Raman
    Nazir, Talha
    Bozorgnia, Babak
    Martinez, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 478 - 478
  • [48] Catheter ablation alone versus catheter ablation with combined percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Junarta, Joey
    Siddiqui, Muhammad U.
    Abaza, Ehab
    Zhang, Peter
    Roshandel, Aarash
    Barbhaiya, Chirag R.
    Jankelson, Lior
    Park, David S.
    Holmes, Douglas
    Chinitz, Larry A.
    Aizer, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 67 (09) : 2147 - 2158
  • [49] Catheter Ablation Alone Versus Catheter Ablation With Combined Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure For Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Junarta, Joey
    Siddiqui, Muhammad
    Abaza, Ehab
    Zhang, Peter
    Roshandel, Aarash
    Barbhaiya, Chirag
    Jankelson, Lior
    Park, David
    Chinitz, Larry
    Aizer, Anthony
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [50] Outcomes of Combined Catheter Ablation and Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    El Iskandarani, Mahmoud
    El Kurdi, Bara
    Murtaza, Ghulam
    Bokhari, Ali
    Refaat, Marwan M.
    Paul, Timir
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140