Switchgrass cultivars and germplasm for biomass feedstock production in Texas

被引:92
|
作者
Sanderson, MA
Reed, RL
Ocumpaugh, WR
Hussey, MA
Van Esbroeck, G
Read, JC
Tischler, C
Hons, FM
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Lab, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Samuel Roberts Noble Fdn Inc, Ardmore, OK USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Agr Res Stn, Beeville, TX USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[5] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[6] Texas A&M Univ, Ctr Agr Res & Extens, Dallas, TX 75252 USA
[7] USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, Temple, TX 76502 USA
关键词
bioenergy crops; Panicum virgatum; soil organic matter;
D O I
10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00132-1
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a warm-season perennial grass indigenous to North America with excellent potential as a bioenergy crop. Our objective was to determine the yield potential and adaptability of switchgrass cultivars and germplasms in diverse Texas environments where the species might be used as a bioenergy crop. We determined the adaptability of several switchgrass cultivars and germplasms at five ecologically different locations (Beeville, College Station, Dallas, Stephenville, and Temple) in Texas in two experiments during 1992 to 1996. Alamo switchgrass was the best adapted commercially available switchgrass cultivar for biomass feedstock production in Texas in these trials with yields of 8 to 20 Mg ha(-1). A single harvest in the fall maximized biomass yield and maintained switchgrass stands. Although very tolerant of moderate or even severe drought, switchgrass failed to yield under chronic extreme drought. At Beeville in 1996, there was no harvestable switchgrass growth because of extreme drought. Upland cultivars from the midwest matured early and did not produce as much biomass as lowland cultivars from the southern U.S. The predominant factor affecting switchgrass productivity in these Texas locations seemed to be rainfall amount. The highest biomass yield at each location generally occurred in years of greatest April to September rainfall. Soil type did not appear to have much influence on biomass production. Soil organic carbon increased from 11.1 to 15.8 g kg(-1) in the upper 30 cm of soil (average of four locations) during 1992 to 1996. These increases in organic carbon indicate a good potential for sequestering carbon through biomass production. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 219
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomass production and soil nutrient removal by switchgrass grown for biofuel production
    Holou, Roland A. Y.
    Stevens, Gene
    Sinsin, Brice
    BIOFUELS-UK, 2011, 2 (06): : 629 - 637
  • [42] Availability and production costs of forest biomass as a feedstock for bioethanol production
    Perez-Verdin, G.
    Navar-Chaidez, J. J.
    Grebner, D. L.
    Soto-Alvarez, C. E.
    FOREST SYSTEMS, 2012, 21 (03) : 526 - 537
  • [43] Nitrogen fertility and harvest management of switchgrass for sustainable bioenergy feedstock production in Illinois
    Anderson, Eric K.
    Parrish, Allen S.
    Voigt, Thomas B.
    Owens, Vance N.
    Hong, Chang-Ho
    Lee, D. K.
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2013, 48 : 19 - 27
  • [44] INVESTIGATING THE LONGTERM BIOMASS YIELD OF MISCANTHUS GIGANTEUS AND SWITCHGRASS WHEN HARVESTED AS A GREEN ENERGY FEEDSTOCK
    Yates, N. E.
    Riche, A. B.
    Shield, I
    Zapater, M.
    Ferchaud, F.
    Ragalini, G.
    Roncucci, N.
    PAPERS OF THE 23RD EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2015, : 61 - 67
  • [45] Managing and enhancing switchgrass as a bioenergy feedstock
    Mitchell, Rob
    Vogel, Kenneth P.
    Sarath, Gautam
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2008, 2 (06): : 530 - 539
  • [46] Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: Harvest and nitrogen management
    Vogel, KP
    Brejda, JJ
    Walters, DT
    Buxton, DR
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (03) : 413 - 420
  • [47] Biomass feedstock production systems: Economic and environmental benefits
    Coleman, Mark D.
    Stanturf, John A.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (8-9): : 693 - 695
  • [48] Corn fiber as a biomass feedstock for production of succinic acid
    Vallecilla-Yepez L.
    Ramchandran D.
    Long D.
    Saha R.
    Wilkins M.R.
    Bioresource Technology Reports, 2021, 16
  • [49] EVALUATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SORGHUM BIOMASS AS FEEDSTOCK FOR SUGAR PRODUCTION
    Theerarattananoon, K.
    Wu, X.
    Staggenborg, S.
    Propheter, J.
    Madl, R.
    Wang, D.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2010, 53 (02) : 509 - 525
  • [50] Seaweed biomass of the Philippines: Sustainable feedstock for biogas production
    Marquez, Gian Powell B.
    Santianez, Wilfred John E.
    Trono, Gavino C., Jr.
    Montano, Marco Nemesio E.
    Araki, Hiroshi
    Takeuchi, Hisae
    Hasegawa, Tatsuya
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 38 : 1056 - 1068