The search for objective criteria at the limit of viability

被引:2
|
作者
Bartels, Dorothee B. [1 ]
Poets, Christian F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Epidemiol Publ Med & Healthcare Syst Res, DE-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Dept Neonatol, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
intrauterine growth retardation; very preterm infant; survival; birth weight centiles; ethic; bias;
D O I
10.1159/000110867
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Defining the limit of viability among very pre-term infants remains a difficult issue. A recent study suggested severity of intrauterine growth retardation as a decisive criterion, reporting very poor survival for infants born at <= 28 weeks with birth weight <2nd centile. Objective: To check whether the above criterion can be confirmed in a similar analysis of German data. Methods: Analyses were based on German population-based data from Lower Saxony, including preterm neonates (22-28 weeks) without severe congenital malformations (n = 3,453), born 1991-1999. For the definition of growth retardation postnatal (<3rd, <10th centile) and antenatal (<3rd centile) reference values were used. Results: Depending on the definition used, proportions of growth retarded infants varied considerably (4-16%). Survival rates increased from 0 to 64%, arguing against considering infants <28 weeks' GA as a homogenous group with regard to their odds for survival. Conclusion: There is an association between severity of growth retardation and VLBW mortality in general, but overinterpreting results from single studies may lead to dangerous conclusions. Data from preterm infants should be stratified by week of gestation. Copyright (C) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 196
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Limit of viability in Japan: ethical consideration
    Nishida, Hiroshi
    Sakuma, Izumi
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (05) : 457 - 460
  • [32] Resuscitation of Infants Born at the Limit of Viability
    Christina Glick
    Journal of Perinatology, 2005, 25 (10) : 623 - 623
  • [33] Treatment differences at the limit of viability in Europe
    Arabin B.
    Hellmeyer L.
    Der Gynäkologe, 2010, 43 (6): : 483 - 494
  • [34] The Limit of Viability: Should We Lower It?
    Yadav, Kamini
    Field, David
    NEONATOLOGY, 2011, 100 (03) : 295 - 296
  • [35] Decision-making at the limit of viability
    Lemos, Ana
    Soares, Henrique
    Guimaraes, Hercilia
    MINERVA PEDIATRICS, 2021, 73 (04): : 348 - 362
  • [36] In search of the answers to the viability questions
    Omaygenc, Mehmet Onur
    Morgan, Holly
    Mielniczuk, Lisa
    Perera, Divaka
    Panza, Julio A.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 39
  • [37] POLICY IN SEARCH OF AN OBJECTIVE
    WEHRMANN, G
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1978, 56 (WIN) : 425 - 437
  • [38] The Search for "Objective" Audiometry
    Jacobson, Gary P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (04) : 330 - 330
  • [39] Variable objective search
    Sergiy Butenko
    Oleksandra Yezerska
    Balabhaskar Balasundaram
    Journal of Heuristics, 2013, 19 : 697 - 709
  • [40] Objective evaluation of the viability of cryopreserved oocytes
    De Santis, L.
    Cino, I.
    Coticchio, G.
    Fusi, F. M.
    Papaleo, E.
    Rabellotti, E.
    Brigante, C.
    Borini, A.
    Ferrari, A.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 15 (03) : 338 - 345