Simulating cross-shore material exchange at decadal scale. Model application

被引:24
|
作者
Palalane, Jaime [1 ,2 ]
Fredriksson, Caroline [1 ]
Marinho, Barbara [3 ,4 ]
Larson, Magnus [1 ]
Hanson, Hans [1 ]
Coelho, Carlos [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Water Resources Engn, Box 118, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Eduardo Mondlane Univ, Dept Civil Engn, CP 257, Maputo, Mozambique
[3] Univ Aveiro, RISCO, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[4] Univ Aveiro, Dept Civil Engn, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
Cross-shore transport; Mathematical model; Long-term profile evolution; Regional coastal evolution; Dune erosion; Overwash; Wind-blown sand; Bar volume; Angelholm; Barra; Macaneta; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AVEIRO COAST; PROFILE; EROSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.05.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A model developed to describe long-term cross-shore (CS) exchange of sand and resulting profile evolution at regional scale was employed to simulate the evolution at three different sites. The model consists of modules for calculating dune erosion and overwash, bar-berm material exchange, and dune build-up by wind-blown sand transport, as described in detail in a companion paper (Larson et al., 2016). Selected study sites represent coastal stretches influenced by beach nourishment (Barra in Portugal), overwash and breaching (Macaneta spit in Mozambique), and dune development (Angelholm in Sweden). The model applications showed overall good performance and the results of the simulations are promising. Due to limitations in data availability in Angelholm and Macaneta, values on calibration parameters were mainly determined based on previous studies. For Barra, where more field measurements were available, the application showed good agreement between the simulated results and observations. The CS-model proved to be a useful tool to predict long-term evolution of beach-dune systems in a time perspective from years to decades. However, additional efforts should be directed towards improving the schematized model profile so that it can better represent other beach shapes such as a sloping berm or a barrier shape. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 41
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combined longshore and cross-shore shoreline model for closed embayed beaches
    Yen Hai Tran
    Barthelemy, Eric
    COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 158
  • [32] A cross-shore model of barrier island migration over a compressible substrate
    Rosati, Julie Dean
    Dean, Robert G.
    Stone, Gregory W.
    MARINE GEOLOGY, 2010, 271 (1-2) : 1 - 16
  • [33] Application of an Aerodynamic Model on a Very Small Scale.
    Adami, A.
    Alfonsi, G.
    Da Deppo, L.
    Energia Elettrica, 1981, 58 (11): : 458 - 463
  • [34] Cross-shore sediment transport: A field test of the Bailard energetics model.
    Aagaard, T
    Greenwood, B
    Nielsen, J
    COASTAL ENGINEERING 1998, VOLS 1-3, 1999, : 2331 - 2343
  • [35] Modeling cross-shore sediment transport processes with a time domain Boussinesq model
    Long, W
    Hsu, TJ
    Kirby, JT
    COASTAL ENGINEERING 2004, VOLS 1-4, 2005, : 1874 - 1886
  • [36] Prediction of cross-shore beach profile evolution using a diffusion type model
    Karunarathna, Harshinie
    Horrillo-Caraballo, Jose M.
    Reeve, Dominic E.
    CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH, 2012, 48 : 157 - 166
  • [37] SIMPLE MODEL OF CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT RATE FOR BERM FORMATION AND EROSION
    Suzuki, Takayuki
    Kuriyama, Yoshiaki
    COASTAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 1762 - 1773
  • [38] Morphologic properties derived from a simple cross-shore sediment transport model
    Plant, NG
    Ruessink, BG
    Wijnberg, KM
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2001, 106 (C1) : 945 - 958
  • [39] A Long-Term Coastal Evolution Model with Longshore and Cross-Shore Transport
    Palalane, Jaime
    Larson, Magnus
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 36 (02) : 411 - 423
  • [40] Unraveling the dynamics that scale cross-shore headland relief on rocky coastlines: 2. Model predictions and initial tests
    Limber, Patrick W.
    Murray, A. Brad
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2014, 119 (04) : 874 - 891