Sex differences and occupational choice Theorizing for policy informed by behavioral science

被引:5
|
作者
Stern, Charlotta [1 ,2 ]
Madison, Guy [3 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Ratio Inst, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Sociol, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Psychol, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
Sex segregation; Social conditioning; Cognitive factors; Personality; Occupational choice; NATIONS TESTING EVOLUTIONARY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE-ABILITIES; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; JOURNAL ARTICLES; DIGIT RATIO; PREFERENCES; INTERESTS; SEGREGATION; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.032
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Occupations are segregated with respect to sex, even in modern, egalitarian societies. There are strong pressures to eliminate segregation and therefore strong reasons to correctly the-orize why segregation persists. The dominant view underpinning most public policies is essentially that environmental factors nudge women and men into different occupational paths. Nudging, however, ignores research suggesting that psychological traits that influ-ence occupational choice differs between women and men, on average. Some of the most well-documented and persistent average sex differences between men and women suggest that the taken-for-granted assumption that an egalitarian society would exhibit a more or less equal distribution of men and women across the occupational landscape may be mistaken. Rather, models of occupational choice informed by individ-ual differences in preferences, broadly understood, would help us better explain how men and women behave in the labor market. Differences in occupational preferences will affect choices. Therefore, differences in proportions of women and men across professions may be in line with an egalitarian society and the well-being and best interest of both men and women in society.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 702
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Science of Frailty Sex Differences
    Park, Caroline
    Ko, Fred C.
    CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2021, 37 (04) : 625 - 638
  • [32] Change and choice: research and evidence-informed policy
    Vivekanand Jha
    Dwomoa Adu
    Nature Reviews Nephrology, 2021, 17 : 9 - 10
  • [33] Change and choice: research and evidence-informed policy
    Jha, Vivekanand
    Adu, Dwomoa
    NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 17 (01) : 9 - 10
  • [34] Balancing Science and Informed Choice in Decisions about Vertebroplasty
    Weinstein, James N.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (06): : 619 - 621
  • [35] Behavioral Science Interventions: Integrating the Decision Task, Context, and Individual Differences to Inform Policy
    Leer, Jane
    Gaither, Sarah
    Gassman-Pines, Anna
    TRANSLATIONAL ISSUES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 7 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [36] Sex differences and science: the etiology of science excellence
    Haworth, Claire M. A.
    Dale, Philip S.
    Plomin, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 50 (09) : 1113 - 1120
  • [37] Sex differences in behavioral effects of cannabinoids
    Craft, RM
    LIFE SCIENCES, 2005, 77 (20) : 2471 - 2478
  • [38] SEX DIFFERENCES IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL TRAITS
    GARAI, JE
    SCHEINFE.A
    GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY MONOGRAPHS, 1968, 77 (02): : 169 - &
  • [39] Theorizing Sex Differences in Political Knowledge: Insights from a Twin Study
    Hannagan, Rebecca J.
    Littvay, Levente
    Popa, Sebastian Adrian
    POLITICS & GENDER, 2014, 10 (01) : 89 - 114
  • [40] AGE AT MARRIAGE IN MICHOACAN - SEX AND OCCUPATIONAL DIFFERENCES
    MCCULLOUGH, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1987, 72 (02) : 232 - 232