Artificial Intelligence in Steam Cracking Modeling: A Deep Learning Algorithm for Detailed Effluent Prediction

被引:53
|
作者
Plehiers, Pieter P. [1 ]
Symoens, Steffen H. [1 ]
Amghizar, Ismael [1 ]
Marin, Guy B. [1 ]
Stevens, Christian V. [2 ]
Van Geem, Kevin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Mat Text & Chem Engn, Lab Chem Technol, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Green Chem & Technol, SynBioC Res Grp, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Steam cracking; Artificial neural networks; COMPLEX HYDROCARBON MIXTURES; MOLECULAR RECONSTRUCTION; THERMAL-CRACKING; NEURAL-NETWORK; AB-INITIO; METHODOLOGY; PERSPECTIVE; CHALLENGES; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.eng.2019.02.013
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Chemical processes can benefit tremendously from fast and accurate effluent composition prediction for plant design, control, and optimization. The Industry 4.0 revolution claims that by introducing machine learning into these fields, substantial economic and environmental gains can be achieved. The bottleneck for high-frequency optimization and process control is often the time necessary to perform the required detailed analyses of, for example, feed and product. To resolve these issues, a framework of four deep learning artificial neural networks (DL ANNs) has been developed for the largest chemicals production process-steam cracking. The proposed methodology allows both a detailed characterization of a naphtha feedstock and a detailed composition of the steam cracker effluent to be determined, based on a limited number of commercial naphtha indices and rapidly accessible process characteristics. The detailed characterization of a naphtha is predicted from three points on the boiling curve and paraffins, iso-paraffins, olefins, naphthenes, and aronatics (PIONA) characterization. If unavailable, the boiling points are also estimated. Even with estimated boiling points, the developed DL ANN outperforms several established methods such as maximization of Shannon entropy and traditional ANNs. For feedstock reconstruction, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.3 wt% is achieved on the test set, while the MAE of the effluent prediction is 0.1 wt%. When combining all networks-using the output of the previous as input to the next-the effluent MAE increases to 0.19 wt%. In addition to the high accuracy of the networks, a major benefit is the negligible computational cost required to obtain the predictions. On a standard Intel i7 processor, predictions are made in the order of milliseconds. Commercial software such as COILSIM1D performs slightly better in terms of accuracy, but the required central processing unit time per reaction is in the order of seconds. This tremendous speed-up and minimal accuracy loss make the presented framework highly suitable for the continuous monitoring of difficult-to-access process parameters and for the envisioned, high-frequency real-time optimization (RTO) strategy or process control. Nevertheless, the lack of a fundamental basis implies that fundamental understanding is almost completely lost, which is not always well-accepted by the engineering community. In addition, the performance of the developed networks drops significantly for naphthas that are highly dissimilar to those in the training set. (C) 2019 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1040
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in orthopedic surgery
    Atik, O. Sahap
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2022, 33 (02): : 484 - 485
  • [42] Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications
    Haleem, Muhammad Salman
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [43] Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in liver transplantation
    Bhat, Mamatha
    Rabindranath, Madhumitha
    Chara, Beatriz Sordi
    Simonetto, Douglas A.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 78 (06) : 1216 - 1233
  • [44] Basic Artificial Intelligence Techniques Machine Learning and Deep Learning
    Erickson, Bradley J.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 59 (06) : 933 - 940
  • [45] Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning: definitions and differences
    Jakhar, D.
    Kaur, I.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 45 (01) : 131 - 132
  • [46] SDN Load Prediction Algorithm Based on Artificial Intelligence
    Volkov, Artem
    Proshutinskiy, Konstantin
    Adam, Abuzar B. M.
    Ateya, Abdelhamied A.
    Muthanna, Ammar
    Koucheryavy, Andrey
    DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (DCCN 2019), 2019, 1141 : 27 - 40
  • [47] Development of an Artificial Intelligence Powered TIG Welding Algorithm for the Prediction of Bead Geometry for TIG Welding Processes using Hybrid Deep Learning
    Kesse, Martin A.
    Buah, Eric
    Handroos, Heikki
    Ayetor, Godwin K.
    METALS, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [48] PREDICTION OF RESPONSE TO OAB MEDICATIONS USING DEEP LEARNING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - A LURN RESEARCH STUDY
    Lai, H. Henry
    Zhang, Heming
    Li, Fuhai
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E413 - E413
  • [49] Deep Learning/Artificial Intelligence and Blood-Based DNA Epigenomic Prediction of Cerebral Palsy
    Bahado-Singh, Ray O.
    Vishweswaraiah, Sangeetha
    Aydas, Buket
    Mishra, Nitish Kumar
    Guda, Chittibabu
    Radhakrishna, Uppala
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2019, 20 (09)
  • [50] A Review of Artificial Intelligence's Neural Networks (Deep Learning) Applications in Medical Diagnosis and Prediction
    Djavanshir, G. Reza
    Chen, Xinrui
    Yang, Wenhao
    IT PROFESSIONAL, 2021, 23 (03) : 58 - 61