Primary admission and secondary transfer of trauma patients to Dutch level I and level II trauma centers: predictors and outcomes

被引:8
|
作者
van den Driessche, Claire R. L. [1 ]
Sewalt, Charlie A. [1 ,2 ]
van Ditshuizen, Jan C. [1 ]
Stocker, Lisa [1 ,3 ]
Verhofstad, Michiel H. J. [1 ]
Van Lieshout, Esther M. M. [1 ]
Den Hartog, Dennis [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Surg, Trauma Res Unit, Doctor Molewaterpl 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Ctr Med Decis Making, Dept Publ Hlth, Doctor Molewaterpl 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Transfer; Triage; Major trauma; Level; Trauma center; Predictors; Outcome; SEVERELY INJURED PATIENTS; INTERHOSPITAL TRANSFER; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; CENTER DESIGNATION; DIRECT TRANSPORT; FLEXIBLE TOOL; CENTER CARE; MORTALITY; SYSTEM; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-021-01790-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose The importance and impact of determining which trauma patients need to be transferred between hospitals, especially considering prehospital triage systems, is evident. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between mortality and primary admission and secondary transfer of patients to level I and II trauma centers, and to identify predictors of primary and secondary admission to a designated level I trauma center. Methods Data from the Dutch Trauma Registry South West (DTR SW) was obtained. Patients >= 18 years who were admitted to a level I or level II trauma center were included. Patients with isolated burn injuries were excluded. In-hospital mortality was compared between patients that were primarily admitted to a level I trauma center, patients that were transferred to a level I trauma center, and patients that were primarily admitted to level II trauma centers. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders. A subgroup analysis was done including major trauma (MT) patients (ISS > 15). Predictors determining whether patients were primarily admitted to level I or level II trauma centers or transferred to a level I trauma center were identified using logistic regression models. Results A total of 17,035 patients were included. Patients admitted primarily to a level I center, did not differ significantly in mortality from patients admitted primarily to level II trauma centers (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.06) and patients transferred to level I centers (OR: 0.99; 95%CI 0.57-1.71). Subgroup analyses confirmed these findings for MT patients. Adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that age (OR: 0.96; 95%CI 0.94-0.97), GCS (OR: 0.81; 95%CI 0.77-0.86), AIS head (OR: 2.30; 95%CI 2.07-2.55), AIS neck (OR: 1.74; 95%CI 1.27-2.45) and AIS spine (OR: 3.22; 95%CI 2.87-3.61) are associated with increased odds of transfers to a level I trauma center. Conclusions This retrospective study showed no differences in in-hospital mortality between general trauma patients admitted primarily and secondarily to level I trauma centers. The most prominent predictors regarding transfer of trauma patients were age and neurotrauma. These findings could have practical implications regarding the triage protocols currently used.
引用
收藏
页码:2459 / 2467
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Complications of Trauma Patients Admitted to the ICU in Level I Academic Trauma Centers in the United States
    Mondello, Stefania
    Cantrell, Amy
    Italiano, Domenico
    Fodale, Vincenzo
    Mondello, Patrizia
    Ang, Darwin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [42] Admission patterns of an urban level I trauma center
    Ovadia, P
    Szewczyk, D
    Walker, K
    Abdullah, F
    Schmidt-Gillespie, S
    Rabinovici, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2000, 15 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [43] How Many Traumatic Brain Injured Patients Are Hospitalized in Level I or II Trauma Centers?
    Faul, Mark
    Sugerman, David
    Bell, Jeneita
    Taylor, Christopher
    Xu, Likang
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2012, 27 (05) : E26 - E27
  • [44] Association for Academic Surgery Frequency and Predictors of Trauma Transfer Futility to a Rural Level I Trauma Center
    Amato, Stas
    Vogt, Anne
    Sarathy, Ashwini
    Lahey, Timothy
    Osler, Turner
    Hosmer, David
    Bliss, Sally
    Bruzzese, Cindy
    An, Gary
    Erb, Andrew Larson
    Malhotra, Ajai
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 279 : 1 - 7
  • [45] Repeat Computed Tomography for Trauma Patients Undergoing Transfer to a Level I Trauma Center
    Young, Andrew Joseph
    Meyers, Kenneth Sadler
    Wolfe, Luke
    Duane, Therese Marie
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2012, 78 (06) : 675 - 678
  • [46] The Volume-Outcomes Relationship for United States Level I Trauma Centers
    Bennett, Kyla M.
    Vaslef, Steven
    Pappas, Theodore N.
    Scarborough, John E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 167 (01) : 19 - 23
  • [47] PREDICTORS OF TRAUMATIC SUICIDE ATTEMPTS IN YOUTH PRESENTING TO HOSPITALS WITH LEVEL I TRAUMA CENTERS
    Barczyk, Amanda N.
    Gillon, Jason T.
    Piper, Karen
    Crocker, Catherine L.
    Christie, LeeAnn M.
    Lawson, Karla A.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (02): : 178 - 185
  • [48] Do level I trauma centers address the psychological responses associated with trauma?
    Guess, Katherine E.
    Adams, Raeanna C.
    Gunter, Oliver L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (04) : E193 - E194
  • [49] Level I Trauma Centers: More Is Not Necessarily Better
    He, Jack C.
    Sajankila, Nitin
    Kreiner, Laura A.
    Allen, Debra L.
    Claridge, Jeffrey A.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (04) : 557 - 564
  • [50] Nonmedical factors and the transfer of spine trauma patients initially evaluated at Level III and IV trauma centers
    Missios, Symeon
    Bekelis, Kimon
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (09): : 2028 - 2035