Primary admission and secondary transfer of trauma patients to Dutch level I and level II trauma centers: predictors and outcomes

被引:8
|
作者
van den Driessche, Claire R. L. [1 ]
Sewalt, Charlie A. [1 ,2 ]
van Ditshuizen, Jan C. [1 ]
Stocker, Lisa [1 ,3 ]
Verhofstad, Michiel H. J. [1 ]
Van Lieshout, Esther M. M. [1 ]
Den Hartog, Dennis [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Surg, Trauma Res Unit, Doctor Molewaterpl 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Ctr Med Decis Making, Dept Publ Hlth, Doctor Molewaterpl 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Transfer; Triage; Major trauma; Level; Trauma center; Predictors; Outcome; SEVERELY INJURED PATIENTS; INTERHOSPITAL TRANSFER; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; CENTER DESIGNATION; DIRECT TRANSPORT; FLEXIBLE TOOL; CENTER CARE; MORTALITY; SYSTEM; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-021-01790-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose The importance and impact of determining which trauma patients need to be transferred between hospitals, especially considering prehospital triage systems, is evident. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between mortality and primary admission and secondary transfer of patients to level I and II trauma centers, and to identify predictors of primary and secondary admission to a designated level I trauma center. Methods Data from the Dutch Trauma Registry South West (DTR SW) was obtained. Patients >= 18 years who were admitted to a level I or level II trauma center were included. Patients with isolated burn injuries were excluded. In-hospital mortality was compared between patients that were primarily admitted to a level I trauma center, patients that were transferred to a level I trauma center, and patients that were primarily admitted to level II trauma centers. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders. A subgroup analysis was done including major trauma (MT) patients (ISS > 15). Predictors determining whether patients were primarily admitted to level I or level II trauma centers or transferred to a level I trauma center were identified using logistic regression models. Results A total of 17,035 patients were included. Patients admitted primarily to a level I center, did not differ significantly in mortality from patients admitted primarily to level II trauma centers (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.06) and patients transferred to level I centers (OR: 0.99; 95%CI 0.57-1.71). Subgroup analyses confirmed these findings for MT patients. Adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that age (OR: 0.96; 95%CI 0.94-0.97), GCS (OR: 0.81; 95%CI 0.77-0.86), AIS head (OR: 2.30; 95%CI 2.07-2.55), AIS neck (OR: 1.74; 95%CI 1.27-2.45) and AIS spine (OR: 3.22; 95%CI 2.87-3.61) are associated with increased odds of transfers to a level I trauma center. Conclusions This retrospective study showed no differences in in-hospital mortality between general trauma patients admitted primarily and secondarily to level I trauma centers. The most prominent predictors regarding transfer of trauma patients were age and neurotrauma. These findings could have practical implications regarding the triage protocols currently used.
引用
收藏
页码:2459 / 2467
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primary admission and secondary transfer of trauma patients to Dutch level I and level II trauma centers: predictors and outcomes
    Claire R. L. van den Driessche
    Charlie A. Sewalt
    Jan C. van Ditshuizen
    Lisa Stocker
    Michiel H. J. Verhofstad
    Esther M. M. Van Lieshout
    Dennis Den Hartog
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2022, 48 : 2459 - 2467
  • [2] A Comparison of Outcomes for Spinal Trauma Patients at Level I and Level II Centers
    Baron, Rebecca B.
    Neifert, Sean N.
    Martini, Michael L.
    Maragkos, George A.
    McNeill, Ian T.
    Lamb, Colin
    Rasouli, Jonathan J.
    Caridi, John M.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (04): : 153 - 157
  • [3] Impact of Trauma Center Designation on Outcomes: Is There a Difference Between Level I and Level II Trauma Centers?
    Glance, Laurent G.
    Osler, Turner M.
    Mukamel, Dana B.
    Dick, Andrew W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (03) : 372 - 378
  • [4] Outcomes of trauma patients after transfer to a Level I trauma center
    Rivara, Frederick P.
    Koepsell, Thomas D.
    Wang, Jin
    Nathens, Avery
    Jurkovich, Gregory A.
    MacKenzie, Ellen J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 64 (06): : 1594 - 1599
  • [5] Level I Versus Level II Trauma Centers: An Outcomes-Based Assessment
    Cudnik, Michael T.
    Newgard, Craig D.
    Sayre, Michael R.
    Steinherg, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 66 (05): : 1321 - 1326
  • [6] Patient Outcomes at Urban and Suburban Level I Versus Level II Trauma Centers
    Kaji, Amy H.
    Bosson, Nichole
    Gausche-Hill, Marianne
    Dawes, Aaron J.
    Putnam, Brant
    Shepherd, Tchaka
    Lewis, Roger J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 70 (02) : 161 - 168
  • [7] Mortality benefit of transfer to level I versus level II trauma centers for head-injured patients
    McConnell, KJ
    Newgard, CD
    Mullins, RJ
    Arthur, M
    Hedges, JR
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (02) : 435 - 457
  • [8] Evaluation of Trauma Care in a Mature Level I Trauma Center in The Netherlands: Outcomes in a Dutch Mature Level I Trauma Center
    Lansink, Koen W. W.
    Gunning, Amy C.
    Spijkers, Anique T. E.
    Leenen, Luke P. H.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (10) : 2353 - 2359
  • [9] Evaluation of Trauma Care in a Mature Level I Trauma Center in The Netherlands: Outcomes in a Dutch Mature Level I Trauma Center
    Koen W. W. Lansink
    Amy C. Gunning
    Anique T. E. Spijkers
    Luke P. H. Leenen
    World Journal of Surgery, 2013, 37 : 2353 - 2359
  • [10] Demographic Patterns and Outcomes of Patients in Level I Trauma Centers in Three International Trauma Systems
    Amy C. Gunning
    Koen W. W. Lansink
    Karlijn J. P. van Wessem
    Zsolt J. Balogh
    Frederick P. Rivara
    Ronald V. Maier
    Luke P. H. Leenen
    World Journal of Surgery, 2015, 39 : 2677 - 2684