Effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave treatment for low back pain:a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

被引:3
|
作者
Ma, Jinhui [1 ]
Yan, Yan [2 ]
Wang, Bailiang [1 ,3 ]
Sun, Wei [1 ,4 ]
Yue, Debo [1 ]
Wang, Weiguo [1 ]
机构
[1] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Ctr Osteonecrosis & Joint Preserving & Reconstruct, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat sen Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Ctr Osteonecrosis & Joint Preserving & Reconstruct, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2 Yinghuadong Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Ctr Osteonecrosis & Joint Preserving & Reconstruct, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2 Yinghuadong Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
关键词
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy; Low back pain; Systematic review and meta-analysis; CLINICAL-PRACTICE-GUIDELINES; THERAPY; DISABILITY; QUALITY; PREVALENCE; COUNTRIES; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.03.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for patients with low back pain (LBP). Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane's library, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched until December 2019 to identify studies assessing the effectiveness and safety of EPSW for LBP. The prime outcome is pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale (NRS). Other outcomes included functional status, quality of life, psychological outcomes measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), as well as the adverse events. Mean differences (MD) were calculated for continuous outcomes, while odd ratios (OR) were calculated for binary outcomes. Revman 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference in post-treatment pain scores was-2.37 (P <0.0001), indicating that post-treatment pain scores was significantly higher by 2.37 in control group than in ESWT group. At a mean follow-up time of 4-6 weeks, the pooled mean difference in ODI scores was-14.10 (P <0.00001), indicating that the pooled mean difference of post-treatment ODI scores was 14.10 higher in control group than in ESWT group. The use of ESWT is effective in alleviating pain and improving the general functional state for patients with LBP. However, more evidence was needed to verify its safety.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The efficacy, safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound and shock wave therapies for low back pain: a systematic review
    Seco, Jesus
    Kovacs, Francisco M.
    Urrutia, Gerard
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (10): : 966 - 977
  • [22] Efficacy of neuromobilization in the treatment of low back pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Quanzheng
    Wang, Zhenshan
    Chen, Xian
    Du, Jinchao
    Zhang, Shuna
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [23] Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture modalities for overweight and obesity treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
    Kim, Youngjin
    Park, Ha-im
    Chu, Hongmin
    Jin, Hanbit
    Leem, Jungtae
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [24] Effectiveness and safety of indirect moxibustion for the treatment of allergic rhinitis A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
    Yuan, Ting
    Fu, Yong
    Xiong, Jun
    Zhang, Haifeng
    Yang, Jun
    Wang, Xue
    Fan, Hao
    Jiang, Yunfeng
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Liao, Kai
    Xu, Lingling
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (28) : E20911
  • [25] Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Acupressure on Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Tao
    Li, Xiaohui
    Huang, Fan
    Tian, Qiang
    Fan, Z. Y.
    Wu, S.
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [26] Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressants for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ferraro, Michael C.
    Bagg, Matthew K.
    Wewege, Michael A.
    Cashin, Aidan G.
    Leake, Hayley B.
    Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N.
    Jones, Matthew D.
    Gustin, Sylvia M.
    Day, Richard
    Loo, Colleen K.
    McAuley, James H.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [27] Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressants for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Michael C. Ferraro
    Matthew K. Bagg
    Michael A. Wewege
    Aidan G. Cashin
    Hayley B. Leake
    Rodrigo R. N. Rizzo
    Matthew D. Jones
    Sylvia M. Gustin
    Richard Day
    Colleen K. Loo
    James H. McAuley
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for the treatment of back pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ferreira, Giovanni E.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    Zadro, Joshua R.
    Abdel-Shaheed, Christina
    O'Keeffe, Mary
    Maher, Chris G.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [29] The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Treatment for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Richmond, Helen
    Hall, Amanda M.
    Copsey, Bethan
    Hansen, Zara
    Williamson, Esther
    Hoxey-Thomas, Nicolette
    Cooper, Zafra
    Lamb, Sarah E.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [30] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Yoga for Low Back Pain
    Cramer, Holger
    Lauche, Romy
    Haller, Heidemarie
    Dobos, Gustav
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 29 (05): : 450 - 460