Patients' experiences of screening for type 2 diabetes: prospective qualitative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial

被引:53
|
作者
Eborall, Helen [1 ]
Davies, Richard
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
Griffin, Simon
Lawton, Juia
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Gen Practice & Primary Care Res Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Strangeways Res Lab, MRC, Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Res Unit Hlth Behav & Change, Sch Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 335卷 / 7618期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39308.392176.BE
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To provide insight into factors that contribute to the anxiety reported in a quantitative study of the psychological effect of screening for type 2 diabetes. To explore expectations of and reactions to the screening experience of patients with positive, negative, and intermediate results. Design Prospective qualitative interview study of patients attending a screening programme for type 2 diabetes. Setting Seven general practices in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial in the east of England. Participants 23 participants (aged 50-69) attending different stages in the screening process. Results Participants' perceptions changed as they progressed through the screening programme; the stepwise process seemed to help them adjust psychologically. The first screening test was typically considered unimportant and was attended with no thought about its implications. By the final diagnostic test, type 2 diabetes was considered a strong possibility, albeit a "mild" form. After diagnosis, people with screen detected type 2 diabetes tended to downplay its importance and talked confidently about their plans to control it. Participants with intermediate results seemed uncertain about their diagnosis, and those who screened negative were largely unaware of their remaining high risk. Conclusions This study helps in understanding the limited psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes quantified previously, in particular by the quantitative substudy of ADDITION (Cambridge). The findings have implications for implementing such a screening programme in terms of timing and content.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 493
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The @RISK Study: Risk communication for patients with type 2 diabetes: design of a randomised controlled trial
    Welschen, Laura M. C.
    Bot, Sandra D. M.
    Dekker, Jacqueline M.
    Timmermans, Danielle R. M.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Nijpels, Giel
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
  • [12] Experiences of foot and ankle mobilisations combined with home stretches in people with diabetes: a qualitative study embedded in a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial
    Vasileios Lepesis
    Jonathan Marsden
    Joanne Paton
    Alec Rickard
    Jos M. Latour
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 15
  • [13] Experiences of foot and ankle mobilisations combined with home stretches in people with diabetes: a qualitative study embedded in a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial
    Lepesis, Vasileios
    Marsden, Jonathan
    Paton, Joanne
    Rickard, Alec
    Latour, Jos M.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [14] A randomised controlled trial of an educational program by a diabetes nurse in poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes patients
    Goudswaard, A
    Stolk, RP
    de Valk, HW
    Rutten, GEH
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2002, 45 : A316 - A316
  • [15] Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial
    Smith, S. M.
    Paul, G.
    Kelly, A.
    Whitford, D. L.
    O'Shea, E.
    O'Dowd, T.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342 : 482
  • [16] Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events):: a randomised controlled trial
    Dormandy, JA
    Charbonnel, B
    Eckland, DJA
    Erdmann, E
    Massi-Benedetti, M
    Kmoules, IK
    Skene, AM
    Tan, MH
    Lefébvre, PJ
    Murray, GD
    Standl, E
    Wilcox, RG
    Wlhelmsen, L
    Betteridge, J
    Birkeland, K
    Golay, A
    Heine, RJ
    Korányi, L
    Laakso, M
    Mokán, M
    Norkus, A
    Pirags, V
    Podar, T
    Scheen, A
    Scherbaum, W
    Schernthaner, G
    Schmitz, O
    Skrha, J
    Smith, U
    Taton, J
    LANCET, 2005, 366 (9493): : 1279 - 1289
  • [17] Experiences of food abstinence in patients with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study
    Buchmann, Maike
    Wermeling, Matthias
    Lucius-Hoene, Gabriele
    Himmel, Wolfgang
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (01):
  • [18] Preventing glycaemic relapse in recently controlled type 2 diabetes patients: a randomised controlled trial
    M. M. Huizinga
    T. Gebretsadik
    C. Garcia Ulen
    A. K. Shintani
    S. R. Michon
    L. O. Shackleford
    K. L. Wolff
    A. W. Brown
    R. L. Rothman
    T. A. Elasy
    Diabetologia, 2010, 53 : 832 - 839
  • [19] Efficacy and safety of diacerein in patients with inadequatedly controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
    Cardoso, C. R. L.
    Leite, N. C.
    Salles, G. F.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S390 - S390
  • [20] Preventing glycaemic relapse in recently controlled type 2 diabetes patients: a randomised controlled trial
    Huizinga, M. M.
    Gebretsadik, T.
    Ulen, C. Garcia
    Shintani, A. K.
    Michon, S. R.
    Shackleford, L. O.
    Wolff, K. L.
    Brown, A. W.
    Rothman, R. L.
    Elasy, T. A.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2010, 53 (05) : 832 - 839