Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Sun, Pingping [1 ]
Fang, Lei [1 ]
Zhang, Jianzhong [2 ]
Liu, Yang [2 ]
Wang, Guodong [3 ]
Qi, Rui [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Tradit Chinese Med Univ, Coll Rehabil, Dept Tradit Rehabil, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Yueyang Integrated Tradit Chinese & Western Med H, Dept Rehabil, Shanghai 200437, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Fibromyalgia; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; CHRONIC WIDESPREAD PAIN; TRIAL EVALUATING QOL; MOTOR CORTEX; RTMS; DEPRESSION; EFFICACY; INCREASES; CRITERIA; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1093/pm/pnab276
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective Fibromyalgia is a poorly understood pain syndrome. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation therapy and is commonly applied for the management of fibromyalgia. However, controversy about its efficacy remains. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of rTMS for fibromyalgia syndrome. Methods Four medical databases and one physiotherapy database were screened for randomized controlled trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety score, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) score, Short Form-36 General Health Survey mental score, and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) score were set as outcome measures. Results Analysis of 14 studies and 433 participants indicated that rTMS exerted more favorable effects than did sham rTMS after treatment on the NPRS (standardized mean difference = -0.49, 95% confidence interval = -0.86 to -0.13, P = 0.008, I-2 = 68%) and the FIQ (standardized mean difference = -0.50, 95% confidence interval = -0.75 to -0.25, P = 0.0001, I-2 = 28%). However, the BDI, FSS, PCS, mood index, and HADS scores showed no significant difference compared with sham rTMS after treatment. The mean methodological quality of the included studies was an acceptable score of 8.5 based on the PEDro scale, suggesting the validity of our conclusions. Conclusion This study demonstrated that rTMS relieved pain and enhanced the quality of life of patients with fibromyalgia; however, on the basis of current reports, it did not improve anxiety, depression, or other symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 514
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiao
    Yin, Lu
    An, Yun
    Yan, Huixin
    Zhang, Tao
    Lu, Xingang
    Yan, Juntao
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2022, 59
  • [22] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Tourette syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Wang, Liang-Jen
    Lin, Pao-Yen
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (05) : 1110 - 1118
  • [23] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jun
    Zhong, Dongling
    Xiao, Xili
    Yuan, Li
    Li, Yuxi
    Zheng, Yaling
    Li, Juan
    Liu, Tianyu
    Jin, Rongjiang
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (08) : 1103 - 1116
  • [24] Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation alone or in combination with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yong
    Fong, Kenneth N. K.
    Sui, Youxin
    Bai, Zhongfei
    Zhang, Jack Jiaqi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [25] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation for auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guttesen, Liv Liebach
    Albert, Nikolai
    Nordentoft, Merete
    Hjorthoj, Carsten
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 143 : 163 - 175
  • [26] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as Treatment of Poststroke Depression A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shen, Yiting
    Cai, Zhengyun
    Liu, Furong
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Ni, Guangxia
    NEUROLOGIST, 2022, 27 (04) : 177 - 182
  • [27] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Recovery for Patients With Stroke A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    He, Yanjin
    Li, Kaiting
    Chen, Qing
    Yin, Jingyang
    Bai, Dingqun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2020, 99 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [28] Therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qian
    Qiu, Zhengang
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 45 (05) : 1953 - 1967
  • [29] Therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Qian Zhang
    Zhengang Qiu
    Neurological Sciences, 2024, 45 : 1953 - 1967
  • [30] The role of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of cognitive impairment in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Mengting
    Bao, Guanai
    Bai, Lu
    Yu, Enyan
    SCIENCE PROGRESS, 2021, 104 (02)