Exploration of Teammate Trust and Interaction Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Teaming

被引:28
|
作者
Demir, Mustafa [1 ]
McNeese, Nathan J. [2 ]
Gorman, Jaime C. [3 ]
Cooke, Nancy J. [1 ]
Myers, Christopher W. [4 ]
Grimm, David A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Human Syst Engn, Ira A Fulton Sch Engn, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Human Ctr Comp, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Ind Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Agents Branch, Cognit Sci, Models, Dayton, OH 45433 USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Engn Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Automation; Task analysis; Navigation; Autonomous agents; Training; Particle measurements; Monitoring; Artificial intelligence; dynamical systems; team coordination; trust; unmanned air vehicle systems; RECURRENCE PLOTS; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1109/THMS.2021.3115058
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article considers human-autonomy teams (HATs) in which two human team members interact and collaborate with an autonomous teammate to achieve a common task while dealing with unexpected technological failures that were imposed either in automation or autonomy. A Wizard of Oz methodology is used to simulate the autonomous teammate. One of the critical aspects of HAT performance is the trust that develops over time as team members interact with each other in a dynamic task environment. For this reason, it is important to examine the dynamic nature of teammate trust through real-time measures of team interactions. This article examines team interaction and trust to understand better how they change under automation and autonomy failures. Thus, we address two research questions: 1) How does trust in HATs evolve over time?; and 2) How is the relationship between team interaction and trust impacted by the failures? We hypothesize that trust in HATs will decrease as autonomy failures increase. We also hypothesize that team interaction would be related to the development of trust and recovery from the failures. The results implicate three general trends: 1) team interaction dynamics are linked to the development of trust in HATs; 2) trust in the autonomous teammate is only associated with recovery from autonomy failures; 3) team interaction dynamics are related to both automation and autonomy failure recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 705
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2017, 46 : 3 - 12
  • [32] A Human-Autonomy Teaming Approach for a Flight-Following Task
    Brandt, Summer L.
    Lachter, Joel
    Russell, Ricky
    Shively, Robert Jay
    ADVANCES IN NEUROERGONOMICS AND COGNITIVE ENGINEERING (AHFE 2017), 2018, 586 : 12 - 22
  • [33] Visualisation of cyber vulnerabilities in maritime human-autonomy teaming technology
    Walter, Mathew
    Harish, Avanthika Vineetha
    Christison, Luke
    Tam, Kimberly
    WMU JOURNAL OF MARITIME AFFAIRS, 2025,
  • [34] Visualisation of cyber vulnerabilities in maritime human-autonomy teaming technologyVisualisation of cyber vulnerabilities in maritime human-autonomy teaming technologyM. Walter et al.
    Mathew Walter
    Avanthika Vineetha Harish
    Luke Christison
    Kimberly Tam
    WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2025, 24 (1) : 5 - 31
  • [35] Multi-sensor fusion architecture for human-autonomy teaming
    Nothwang, William D.
    Gremillion, Gregory M.
    Donavanik, Daniel
    Haynes, Benjamin A.
    Atwater, Corey S.
    Canady, Jonroy D.
    Metcalfe, Jason S.
    Marathe, Amar R.
    2016 RESILIENCE WEEK (RWS), 2016, : 166 - 171
  • [36] The Evaluation of a Playbook Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming in Single Pilot Operations
    Tokadli, Guliz
    Dorneich, Michael C.
    Matessa, Michael
    Eda, Seiya
    2019 IEEE/AIAA 38TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2019,
  • [37] Modelling situated intent for human-autonomy teaming: a human-centric approach
    Hammarback, Jimmy
    Johansson, Bjoern J. E.
    Alfredson, Jens
    Lundberg, Jonas
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2024, 25 (06) : 731 - 752
  • [38] Understanding Human-Autonomy Teams Through a Human-Animal Teaming Model
    Lum, Heather C.
    Phillips, Elizabeth K.
    TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03) : 554 - 567
  • [39] Application of the GORITE BDI Framework to Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Case Study
    Noorunnisa S.
    Jarvis D.
    Jarvis J.
    Watson M.
    Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 2019, 27 (01): : 13 - 24
  • [40] Observable and Attention-Directing BDI Agents for Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Archibald, Blair
    Calder, Muffy
    Sevegnani, Michele
    Xu, Mengwei
    ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, (348): : 167 - 175