Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy

被引:139
|
作者
Brem, RF
Behrndt, VS
Sanow, L
Gatewood, OMB
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Breast Imaging & Intervent Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.172.5.10227526
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This review was undertaken to determine the reliability of the histologic diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) made from tissue obtained by 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of impalpable breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four hundred twenty-two 11-gauge stereotactically guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies were performed at our institution between November 5, 1996, and June 30, 1998. Biopsies were performed with the patient prone on a dedicated stereotactic biopsy table. A directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device was used. Eight to 24 cares (mean, 13.4) were harvested from each lesion. Radiography of core specimens was performed in cases in which the target lesion contained microcalcifications. Twenty (4.7%) of the 422 biopsies yielded a histopathologic diagnosis of ADH. Surgical excision of 16 of the 20 lesions was subsequently performed. We compared the histopathologic results of the core extracted and the corresponding surgically excised tissue. RESULTS. Of the 16 surgically excised lesions, four (25.0%) retained the diagnosis of ADH. Four (25%) were upgraded to carcinoma: Two (12.5%) were ductal carcinoma in situ without comedonecrosis, one (6.3%) was invasive carcinoma, and one (6.3%) was tubular carcinoma. Of the remaining eight surgically excised lesions, six (37.5%) were interpreted as benign fibrocystic changes with ductal hyperplasia without atypia, and two (12.5%) were interpreted as lobular carcinoma in situ. CONCLUSION. Because ADH was underdiagnosed in 25% of the lesions, we recommend that surgical excision be performed whenever ADH is found in tissue obtained from 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1405 / 1407
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia in Directional Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications: Considerations for Surgical Excision
    Nguyen, Christopher V.
    Albarracin, Constance T.
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Lopez, Adriana
    Sneige, Nour
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (03) : 752 - 761
  • [32] Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia in Directional Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications: Considerations for Surgical Excision
    Christopher V. Nguyen
    Constance T. Albarracin
    Gary J. Whitman
    Adriana Lopez
    Nour Sneige
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 752 - 761
  • [33] Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device
    Viviana Londero
    Chiara Zuiani
    Anna Linda
    Luisa Battigelli
    Giovanni Brondani
    Massimo Bazzocchi
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 1200 - 1206
  • [34] Can galactography-guided stereotactic, 11-gauge, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of intraductal lesions serve as an alternative to surgical biopsy?
    Reiner, Caecilia S.
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Rudas, Margaretha
    Ponhold, Lothar
    Riedl, Christopher C.
    Kropf, Nina
    Fuchsjaeger, Michael H.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (12) : 2878 - 2885
  • [35] Can galactography-guided stereotactic, 11-gauge, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of intraductal lesions serve as an alternative to surgical biopsy?
    Caecilia S. Reiner
    Thomas H. Helbich
    Margaretha Rudas
    Lothar Ponhold
    Christopher C. Riedl
    Nina Kropf
    Michael H. Fuchsjäger
    European Radiology, 2009, 19 : 2878 - 2885
  • [36] Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device
    Londero, Viviana
    Zuiani, Chiara
    Linda, Anna
    Battigelli, Luisa
    Brondani, Giovanni
    Bazzocchi, Massimo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) : 1200 - 1206
  • [37] Scoring to predict the possibility of upgrades to malignancy in atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy device: An external validation study
    Bendifallah, S.
    Defert, S.
    Chabbert-Buffet, N.
    Maurin, N.
    Chopier, J.
    Antoine, M.
    Bezu, C.
    Touche, D.
    Uzan, S.
    Graesslin, O.
    Rouzier, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [38] Stereotactic breast biopsy: Comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11-and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    Mainiero, Martha B.
    Lazarus, Elizabeth
    Giri, Dilip
    Schepps, Barbara
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (05) : W275 - W279
  • [39] Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed at 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Performed on Suspicious Clustered Microcalcifications: Could Patients Without Residual Microcalcifications Be Managed Conservatively?
    Villa, Alessandro
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Chiesa, Fabio
    Chiaramondia, Maurizio
    Friedman, Daniele
    Calabrese, Massimo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (04) : 1012 - 1018
  • [40] Additional Excision Biopsy in Patients With Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Ultrasound-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy
    Park, Hai Lin
    Yang, Bora
    Shin, Ji Eun
    Kim, Ji-Young
    Shin, Jeong Yun
    Shin, Eunah
    Noh, Songmi
    Kim, Jae Hong
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (04) : 2159 - 2165