Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure

被引:1275
|
作者
Wenzel, WW
Kirchbaumer, N
Prohaska, T
Stingeder, G
Lombi, E
Adriano, DC
机构
[1] Univ Bodenkultur Wien, Inst Soil Sci, BOKU, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Bodenkultur Wien, Inst Chem, BOKU, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[3] IACR Rothamsted, Dept Soil Sci, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
[4] Univ Georgia, Savannah River Ecol Lab, Aiken, SC 29801 USA
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
sequential extraction; arsenic; soil analysis; chemical fractionation;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00924-2
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Risk assessment of contaminants requires simple, meaningful tools to obtain information on contaminant pools of differential lability and bioavailability in the soil. We developed and tested a sequential extraction procedure (SEP) for As by choosing extraction reagents commonly used for sequential extraction of metals, Se and P. Tests with alternative extractants that have been used in SEPs for P and metals, including NH4NO3, NaOAc, NH2OH . HCl, EDTA, NH4OH and NH4F were shown to either have only low extraction efficiency for As, or to be insufficiently selective or specific for the phases targeted. The final sequence obtained includes the following five extraction steps: (1) 0.05 M (NH4)(2)SO4, 20 degreesC/4 h; (2) 0.05 M NH4H2PO4, 20 degreesC/16 h; (3) 0.2 M NH4+-oxalate buffer in the dark, pH 3.25, 20 degreesC/4h; (4) 0.2 M NH4+-oxalate buffer + ascorbic acid, pH 3.25, 96 degreesC/0.5 h; (5) HNO3/H2O2 microwave digestion. Within the inherent limitations of chemical fractionation, these As fractions appear to be primarily associated with (1) non-specifically sorbed; (2) specifically-sorbed; (3) amorphous and poorly-crystalline hydrous oxides of Fe and Al; (4) well-crystallized hydrous oxides of Fe and Al; and (5) residual phases. This interpretation is supported by selectivity and specificity tests on soils and pure mineral phases, and by energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDXMA) of As in selected soils. Partitioning of As among these five fractions in 20 soils was (%, medians and ranges): (1) 0.24 (0.02-3.8); (2) 9.5 (2.6-25); (3) 42.3 (12-73); (4) 29.2 (13-39); and(5) 17.5 (1.1-38). The modified SEP is easily adaptable in routine soil analysis, is dependable as indicated by repeatability (w greater than or equal to 0.98) and recovery tests. This SEP can be useful in predicting the changes in the lability of As in various solid phases as a result of soil remediation or alteration in environmental factors. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 323
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arsenic speciation and bioaccessibility in arsenic-contaminated soils: Sequential extraction and mineralogical investigation
    Kim, Eun Jung
    Yoo, Jong-Chan
    Baek, Kitae
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2014, 186 : 29 - 35
  • [22] Selenium speciation in phosphate mine soils and evaluation of a sequential extraction procedure using XAFS
    Favorito, Jessica E.
    Luxton, Todd P.
    Eick, Matthew J.
    Grossl, Paul R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 229 : 911 - 921
  • [23] Evaluation of a sequential extraction method for determining actinide fractionation in soils and sediments
    Schultz, MK
    Burnett, WC
    Inn, KGW
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 1998, 40 (02) : 155 - 174
  • [24] Comparison of different sequential extraction procedures for mercury fractionation in polluted soils
    Haochen Dong
    Liu Feng
    Yu Qin
    Muxinjian Luo
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 9955 - 9965
  • [25] Fractionation of potentially toxic elements in urban soils from five European cities by means of a harmonised sequential extraction procedure
    Davidson, CM
    Urquhart, GJ
    Ajmone-Marsan, F
    Biasioli, M
    Duarte, AD
    Díaz-Barrientos, E
    Grcman, H
    Hossack, L
    Hursthouse, AS
    Madrid, L
    Rodrigues, S
    Zupan, M
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2006, 565 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [26] Comparison of two sequential extraction procedures for uranium fractionation in contaminated soils
    Vandenhove, Hildegarde
    Vanhoudt, Nathalie
    Duquene, Lise
    Antunes, Kenny
    Wannijn, Jean
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2014, 137 : 1 - 9
  • [27] Evaluation of a sequential extraction method for determining actinide fractionation in soils and sediments
    Schultz, Michael K.
    Burnett, William C.
    Inn, Kenneth G.W.
    Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 40 (02): : 155 - 174
  • [28] Comparison of different sequential extraction procedures for mercury fractionation in polluted soils
    Dong, Haochen
    Feng, Liu
    Qin, Yu
    Luo, Muxinjian
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (10) : 9955 - 9965
  • [29] Sequential extraction procedure for fractionation of Pb and Cr in artificial and contaminated soil
    Qayyum, Sadia
    Khan, Ibrar
    Zhao, Yangguo
    Maqbool, Farhana
    Peng, Changsheng
    MAIN GROUP METAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 39 (1-2) : 49 - 58
  • [30] A sequential extraction procedure for acid sulfate soils: Partitioning of iron
    Claff, Salirian R.
    Sullivan, Leigh A.
    Burton, Edward D.
    Bush, Richard T.
    GEODERMA, 2010, 155 (3-4) : 224 - 230