The Effect of Medical Device Regulations on Deploying a Lean Six Sigma Project

被引:11
|
作者
McGrane, Vincent [1 ]
McDermott, Olivia [2 ]
Trubetskaya, Anna [1 ]
Rosa, Angelo [3 ]
Sony, Michael [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Dept Engn, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
[2] Univ Galway, Coll Sci & Engn, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland
[3] Univ LUM Jean Monnet, Dept Management Studies, I-70010 Casamassima, Italy
[4] Univ Witwatersrand, Wits Business Sch, ZA-2193 Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
continuous improvement; medical device; MedTech; Lean Six Sigma; ISO; 13485; 21CFR; 820; validation; CRITICAL FAILURE FACTORS; BARRIERS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/pr10112303
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the differences in timelines involved in Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project deployment in a regulated industry versus in an unregulated one. Two case studies utilising Lean Six Sigma methods-in order to compare the transfer of manual manufacturing lines within a medical device and electronics manufacturing site-are discussed and utilised. This research aims to show the effects of regulatory procedures on LSS project implementation and timelines. This study particularly highlights how a regulatory environment can be a barrier, or bottleneck, to project management, continuous improvement, and engineering changes in the MedTech or medical device manufacturing industry. The results of this study represent an important first step towards a full understanding of the influence of regulations on operations in medical devices and, by extension, on pharmaceutical manufacturing industries on a global scale. The research limitations are that the data collected were from two specific case study comparisons alone.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lean six sigma through an Australasian lens: project definition, structure and practices
    Perera Halnetti, Achinthya Dharani
    Jayamaha, Nihal
    Grigg, Nigel Peter
    Tunnicliffe, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2024, 15 (03) : 541 - 566
  • [32] Decreasing time to accept maternal transports: a lean six sigma QI project
    Kogutt, Benjamin K.
    Argani, Cynthia
    Hall, Valerie
    Phillips, Michelle
    Graham, Ernie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S411 - S412
  • [33] Effect of Lean Six Sigma on quality performance in Malaysian hospitals
    Ahmed, Selim
    Abd Manaf, Noor Hazilah
    Islam, Rafikul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 31 (08) : 973 - 987
  • [34] The moderating role of Lean Six Sigma practices on quality management practices and quality performance in medical device manufacturing industry
    Sim, Choon Ling
    Chuah, Francis
    Sin, Kit Yeng
    Lim, Yi Jin
    TQM JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (05): : 1273 - 1299
  • [35] A conceptual examination of Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma models for managing waste in manufacturing SMEs
    Sodhi, Harsimran Singh
    Singh, Doordarshi
    Singh, Bikram Jit
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 17 (01): : 20 - 32
  • [36] Lean Six Sigma 4.0-a framework and review for Lean Six Sigma practices in the digital era
    Citybabu, G.
    Yamini, S.
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (09) : 3288 - 3326
  • [37] Lean, six sigma and lean sigma: fads or real process improvement methods?
    Naeslund, Dag
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (03) : 269 - 287
  • [38] Lean Six Sigma, creativity, and innovation
    Hoerl, Roger W.
    Gardner, Martha M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2010, 1 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [39] Green lean and the need for Six Sigma
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2015, 6 (03) : 226 - 248
  • [40] Lean Six Sigma methodology and application
    Ediz Atmaca
    S. Sule Girenes
    Quality & Quantity, 2013, 47 : 2107 - 2127