Utility of Serum Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Stratification of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:61
|
作者
Lewis, Lawrence M. [1 ]
Schloemann, Derek T. [1 ]
Papa, Linda [3 ]
Fucetola, Robert P. [2 ]
Bazarian, Jeffrey [4 ]
Lindburg, Miranda [1 ]
Welch, Robert D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Emergency Med, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Orlando Reg Med Ctr Inc, Dept Emergency Med, Orlando, FL USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Rochester, NY USA
[5] Wayne State Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
FIBRILLARY ACIDIC PROTEIN; CONCUSSION SYMPTOMS QUESTIONNAIRE; C-TERMINAL HYDROLASE; MINOR HEAD-INJURY; INTRACRANIAL LESIONS; NEUROSURGICAL INTERVENTION; COLLABORATING-CENTER; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TASK-FORCE; S100B;
D O I
10.1111/acem.13174
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective was to compare test characteristics of a single serum concentration of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100 beta, and ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), obtained within 6 hours of head injury, to diagnose mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in head-injured subjects. Methods: Adults aged 18 to 80 years who presented to one of seven EDs with a blunt closed head injury underwent head CT within 4 hours of injury and had blood drawn for biomarker analysis within 6 hours of injury were eligible. Subjects were considered to have mTBI if they had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) > 13 and met one or more of the following criteria: loss of consciousness (LOC), posttraumatic amnesia, or confusion. Subjects with mTBI and an abnormal head computed tomography (CT) scan were categorized as complicated mTBI; those with a normal head CT were categorized as uncomplicated mTBI; and subjects with a GCS = 15, no LOC, no posttraumatic amnesia, and no confusion were considered to not have a mTBI. Biomarker concentration measurements for GFAP and UCH-L1 were performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. S-100 beta concentration was determined using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Median biomarker concentration for each group was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Logistic regression was used to determine area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for each of the three biomarkers. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative and positive likelihood ratios (LRs) for the three biomarkers to differentiate between complicated mTBI, uncomplicated mTBI, and no mTBI were calculated. Results: A total of 247 subjects were enrolled and had adequate clinical and biomarker information for analysis. A total of 188 met criteria for mTBI, with 34 (18.1%) having an acute abnormality on CT (complicated mTBI). The mean (+/- SD) age of the study population was 45.8 (+/- 17.3) years, and 59.9% were male. Median serum concentrations for all biomarkers were significantly different between groups, lowest in the no mTBI group, and progressively increasing in the uncomplicated and complicated mTBI groups (p < 0.0001). All three biomarkers were significant classifiers of mTBI versus no mTBI, with the following AUCs: GFAP, 0.70; S-100 beta, 0.69; and UCHL1, 0.65 (p = 0.17). Sensitivity for mTBI was highest for S-100 beta (96.5%). NPVs ranged from 31% for UCH-L1 to 35% for GFAP. PPVs ranged from 75.5% for S-100 beta to 96.5% for GFAP. Negative LR ranged from 0.59 for GFAP to 0.71 for UCH-L1, with positive LR ranging from 1.0 for both UCH-L1 and S-100 beta to 8.7 for GFAP. Conclusion: A single serum concentration of GFAP, UCH-L1, or S-100 beta within 6 hours of head injury may be useful in identifying and stratifying the severity of brain injury in emergency department patients with head trauma, but cannot reliably exclude a diagnosis of concussion. A positive GFAP was associated with the presence of concussion.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 720
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The role of biomarkers for the management of mild traumatic brain injury
    Alexiou, George A.
    Voulgaris, Spyridon
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 193
  • [32] Advances in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Imaging Biomarkers
    Shah R.N.
    Allen J.W.
    Current Radiology Reports, 5 (4)
  • [33] The utility of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury clinical management
    Ana Rodríguez-Rodríguez
    Juan José Egea-Guerrero
    Critical Care, 20
  • [34] The utility of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury clinical management
    Peter Thelin, Eric
    Jeppsson, Emma
    Bellander, Bo-Michael
    Nelson, David W.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [35] Accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis
    Powell, Janet M.
    Ferraro, Joseph V.
    Dikmen, Sureyya S.
    Temkin, Nancy R.
    Bell, Kathleen R.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (08): : 1550 - 1555
  • [36] Diagnosis and Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Sandel N.
    Collins M.W.
    Current Trauma Reports, 2018, 4 (2) : 127 - 137
  • [37] The utility of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury clinical management
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Ana
    Jose Egea-Guerrero, Juan
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [38] A New Panel of Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Concussion in Adults
    Shan, Rongzi
    Szmydynger-Chodobska, Joanna
    Warren, Otis U.
    Mohammad, Farah
    Zink, Brian J.
    Chodobski, Adam
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2016, 33 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [39] Temporal profile and utility of serum neurofilament light in a rat model of mild traumatic brain injury
    O'Brien, William T.
    Pham, Louise
    Brady, Rhys D.
    Bain, Jesse
    Yamakawa, Glenn R.
    Sun, Mujun
    Mychasiuk, Richelle
    O'Brien, Terence J.
    Monif, Mastura
    Shultz, Sandy R.
    McDonald, Stuart J.
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2021, 341
  • [40] To study the serum biomarkers in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and correlate with cognitive deficits
    Dey, Subir
    Shukla, Dhaval
    BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (6-7) : 759 - 759