Factors affecting mercury control in utility flue gas using activated carbon

被引:100
|
作者
Carey, TR
Hargrove, CW
Richardson, CF
Chang, R
机构
[1] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA
[2] Radian Int LLC, Austin Labs, Austin, TX USA
[3] Meserole Consulting, Austin, TX USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10473289.1998.10463753
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is conducting research to investigate mercury removal in utility flue gas using sorbents. Bench-scale and pilot-scale tests have been conducted to determine the abilities of different sorbents to remove mercury in simulated and actual flue gas streams. Bench-scale tests have investigated the effects of various sorbent and flue gas parameters on sorbent performance. These data are being used to develop a theoretical model for predicting mercury removal by sorbents at different conditions. This paper describes the results of parametric bench-scale tests investigating the removal of mercuric chloride and elemental mercury by activated carbon. Results obtained to date indicate that the adsorption capacity of a given sorbent is dependent on many factors, including the type of mercury being adsorbed, flue gas composition, and adsorption temperature. These data provide insight into potential mercury adsorption mechanisms and suggest that the removal of mercury involves both physical and chemical mechanisms. Understanding these effects is important since the performance of a given sorbent could vary significantly from site to site depending on the coal- or gas-matrix composition.
引用
收藏
页码:1166 / 1174
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of flue gas components on mercury adsorption by ammonium chloride modified activated carbon
    Zhu, Chun
    Duan, Yu-Feng
    Mao, Yong-Qiu
    Zhou, Qiang
    She, Min
    Wei, Hong-Qi
    Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34 (10): : 1982 - 1985
  • [22] Mercury emission control from combustion flue gas employing semi-fluidized bed activated carbon adsorption
    Ho, TC
    Lee, YK
    Hopper, JR
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2005, 36 (01): : 77 - 84
  • [23] Noble metal catalysts for mercury oxidation in utility flue gas
    不详
    GOLD BULLETIN, 2008, 41 (03): : CGN11 - CGN11
  • [24] Removal of Elemental Mercury from Flue Gas by Modified Coal-based Activated Carbon
    Li, Yang
    Li, Xiang-Yang
    Huang, Pan
    Lu, Zi-Long
    Zhao, Yong-Chun
    Zhang, Jun-Ying
    Hu, Hao-Quan
    Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2020, 41 (04): : 1035 - 1041
  • [25] Oxidative Adsorption of Elemental Mercury by Activated Carbon in Simulated Coal-Fired Flue Gas
    Hu, Changxing
    Zhou, Jinsong
    Luo, Zhongyang
    Cen, Kefa
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2011, 25 (01) : 154 - 158
  • [26] Oxidative Adsorption of Elemental Mercury by Activated Carbon from Coconut Shell in Simulated Flue Gas
    Hu, Changxing
    Zhou, Jinsong
    Li, Jianxin
    Zheng, Jiao
    Wang, Yongchuan
    Luo, Zhongyang
    Cen, Kefa
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 49 (07) : 1062 - 1066
  • [27] Dynamic measurement of mercury adsorption and oxidation on activated carbon in simulated cement kiln flue gas
    Zheng, Yuanjing
    Jensen, Anker D.
    Windelin, Christian
    Jensen, Flemming
    FUEL, 2012, 93 (01) : 649 - 657
  • [28] Adsorption of mercury by activated carbon prepared from dried sewage sludge in simulated flue gas
    Park, Jeongmin
    Lee, Sang-Sup
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2018, 68 (10) : 1077 - 1084
  • [29] Cobenefit of SO3 reduction on mercury capture with activated carbon in coal flue gas
    Zhuang, Ye
    Martin, Christopher
    Pavlish, John
    Botha, Francois
    FUEL, 2011, 90 (10) : 2998 - 3006
  • [30] Removal of elemental mercury from simulated flue gas by a novel composite sulfurized activated carbon
    Qiu, Lei
    Zhai, Yunbo
    Chen, Hongmei
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Zhu, Lu
    Li, Caiting
    Zeng, Guangming
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2018, 40 (04) : 381 - 387