A real-world comparison of in-person vs. virtual contraceptive care trainings for clinicians and support staff

Objectives: To conduct an exploratory analysis comparing in-person vs. virtual training programs about contraceptive care among clinicians and staff at 14 healthcare agencies in Washington state.Methods: Survey data from in-person trainings were collected between July 2019 and March 2020 and from virtual trainings between June 2020 and January 2021. Primary outcomes: changes in contraceptive knowledge, understanding of contraceptive counseling and care, and participant engagement and experi-ence with the training.Results: Post-survey response rates for in-person trainings were 82% for clinicians and 72% for support staff while post-survey response rates for virtual trainings were 48% for clinicians and 43% for staff. Aver-age knowledge scores for in-person clinician trainings increased from 63% prior to training to 80% post -training ( p < 0.05), knowledge scores for virtual clinician trainings increased from 72% to 86% ( p < 0.05), and the pre-to-post change in scores between training modalities was similar ( p > 0.05 for the score dif-ference). Average knowledge scores among in-person support staff trainings increased from 63% to 84% ( p < 0.05), scores among virtual support staff trainings increased from 68% to 87% ( p < 0.05) and, again, the pre-to-post change in scores between training modalities was similar ( p > 0.05 for the score differ-ence). Only minimal differences in survey scores between modalities were observed on most measures of participant engagement and experience with the trainings ( p > 0.05 for most score differences).Conclusions: These exploratory results suggest that in-person and virtual contraceptive care trainings yielded comparable results among both clinicians and support staff.Implications: Results from this post-hoc analysis of survey data suggest a general equivalency of effec-tiveness between in-person trainings and virtual trainings, although in-person trainings may be more satisfying or engaging for participants. Further work and research is needed to inform strategies for mak-ing virtual trainings more engaging and satisfying for participants.(c) 2022 Upstream USA. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )