Reoccurring discogenic low back pain (LBP) after discoblock treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)

被引:19
|
作者
Liu, Junhui [1 ]
He, Yongqing [2 ]
Huang, Bao [1 ]
Zhang, Xuyang [1 ]
Shan, Zhi [1 ]
Chen, Jian [1 ]
Fan, Shunwu [1 ]
Zhao, Fengdong [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med,Dept Orthopaed, Key Lab Musculoskeletal Syst Degenerat & Regenera, 3 Qingchun Rd East, Hangzhou 310016, Peoples R China
[2] Haining Cty Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Haining, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Discogenic LBP; Discoblock; OLIF; HIGH-INTENSITY ZONE; COMPLICATIONS; NUCLEOPLASTY; DISRUPTION; INJECTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-020-1554-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To determine the efficacy of OLIF in the treatment of reoccurring discogenic low back pain (LBP) after discoblock Methods We included 108 patients with LBP that was suspected to be discogenic (such as high intensity zone, Schmorl's nodes, Modic changes Type I, etc.), from August 2015 to August 2017. All patients underwent discography, and patients whose LBP was confirmed to be discogenic received discoblock. Patients who had reoccurring pain after discoblock underwent OLIF. Perioperative parameters and complications were recorded. The VAS and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed at preoperation, and 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. The fusion rate was evaluated. Results Of 108 patients, 89 were confirmed to have discogenic LBP, and 32/89 patients with reoccurring LBP pain after discoblock underwent OLIF. Twenty-eight patients were followed up for >= 1 year. The OLIF operation lasted for 92 +/- 34 min. Blood loss during the operation was 48 +/- 15 ml. The mean incision length was 3.0 +/- 0.6 cm. The average length of stay was 4.8 +/- 1.9 days. The VAS and ODI scores decreased from 8.1 +/- 1.7 preoperatively to 0.9 +/- 0.4, and from 71.2 +/- 11.3 to 9.3 +/- 3.1, 12 months postoperatively, respectively. The total incidence of complications was 15.6%, including 2 cases of cage subsidence, 2 cases of ipsilateral hip flexor weakness, and 1 case of ipsilateral anterior thigh pain. All symptoms relieved or disappeared during follow-up. The fusion rate was 96.9%. Conclusions Reoccurring discogenic LBP after discoblock should be considered as a suitable group for treatment by OLIF.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Automated Pressure-Controlled Discography in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Back Pain
    Lee, Chang Kyu
    Shin, Dong Ah
    Kim, Hyoung Ihl
    Yi, Seong
    Ha, Yoon
    Kim, Keung Nyun
    Yoon, Do Heum
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 97 : 8 - 15
  • [22] Comparative study of clinical effects between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine
    Wang, YiXiao
    Song, Yang
    Ma, Yue
    Sun, Xinyu
    Wang, Hua
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 40 (10) : 2238 - 2242
  • [23] Intraoperative Facet Joint Block Reduces Pain After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Noh, Sung Hyeon
    Lee, Sang-Woo
    Hwang, Jong-moon
    Jung, Jinwoo
    Lee, Eunyoung
    Cho, Dae-Chul
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Kim, Kyoung-Tae
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2025, 107 (01): : 16 - 25
  • [24] Effect of Stand-Alone Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Treating Lumbar Spine Lesions
    Song, Yongxing
    Wang, Haidong
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2023, 29
  • [25] Oblique lateral interbody fusion stand-alone vs. combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of discogenic low back pain
    Wang, Weiheng
    Xiao, Bing
    Wang, Haotian
    Qi, Junqiang
    Gu, Xin
    Yu, Jiangming
    Ye, Xiaojian
    Xu, Guohua
    Xi, Yanhai
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [26] Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Lumbar Discogenic Low Back Pain: A One Year Prospective Outcome Study Using Discoblock for Diagnosis
    Fukui, Sei
    Nitta, Kazuhito
    Iwashita, Narihito
    Tomie, Hisashi
    Nosaka, Shuichi
    Rohof, Olav
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2013, 16 (04) : E435 - E442
  • [27] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF): we should not compare two procedures that serve different purposes
    Beucler, Nathan
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [28] Ventral Dural Injury After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Chang, JaeChil
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Jo, Hyunjin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 98 : 881.e1 - 881.e4
  • [29] Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
    Zhang, Bin
    Hu, Yuan
    Kong, Qingquan
    Feng, Pin
    Liu, Junlin
    Ma, Junsong
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [30] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF): we should not compare two procedures that serve different purposes
    Nathan Beucler
    Neurosurgical Review, 46