Three-Dimensional Analysis of Bone Formation After Maxillary Sinus Augmentation by Means of Microcomputed Tomography: A Pilot Study

被引:1
|
作者
Kuehl, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Goetz, Hermann [3 ]
Hansen, Torsten [4 ]
Kreisler, Matthias [2 ]
Behneke, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Heil, Uli [5 ]
Duschner, Heinz [6 ]
d'Hoedt, Berndt [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Clin Oral Surg Radiol & Oral Med, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Oral Surg Oral Radiol & Oral Med, Mainz, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Appl Struct & Microanal, Mainz, Germany
[4] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Pathol, Mainz, Germany
[5] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Informat, Mainz, Germany
[6] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Inst Appl Struct & Microanal, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
[7] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Oral Surg, Univ Med Ctr, Mainz, Germany
关键词
bone grafting; maxillary sinus augmentation; microcomputed tomography; SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT; TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE GRAFT; MICRO-COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BIOACTIVE GLASS GRANULES; FLOOR AUGMENTATION; AUTOGENOUS BONE; TRABECULAR BONE; HISTOLOGICAL SECTIONS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; CT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Although many studies have analyzed the suitability of different grafting materials for maxillary sinus augmentation by means of histomorphometry in conventional histologic strains, the three-dimensional (3D) structure and remodeling of these grafts after healing beneath the sinus membrane remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine whether microcomputed tomography is a suitable method to evaluate the 3D structure and remodeling of grafts after sinus floor augmentation. Materials and Methods: Sinus floor augmentation was performed in five patients using autogenous bone (AB) alone, AB and beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP, Cerasorb), AB and beta TCP/hydroxyapatite (HA) (BoneCeramic), AB and calcium carbonate (Algipore), and AB and HA (PepGen). Specimens from the grafted sites were harvested by means of a trephine bur 5 to 16 months after maxillary sinus augmentation. Microcomputed tomography of these specimens was performed with a nominal isotropic resolution of 6 x 6 x 6 mu m(2) voxel size. After segmentation, 3D images were reconstructed, and the distribution of bone and substitute material was evaluated by means of volumetric and density measurements. Results: In all images, both bone and substitute material could clearly be identified. The connectivity of trabeculae surrounding the substitute material was visible in the 3D reconstructions. Volumetric evaluation such as total bone volume, volume of substitute material, and trabecular thickness and spacing revealed differences between the different grafting materials. Conclusion: Microcomputed tomography is a promising method to evaluate the 3D structure of grafts after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone and bone substitute materials. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2010;25:930-938
引用
收藏
页码:930 / 938
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microradiography and microcomputed tomography comparative analysis in human bone cores harvested after maxillary sinus augmentation: a pilot study
    Soardi, Carlo Maria
    Clozza, Emanuele
    Turco, Gianluca
    Biasotto, Matteo
    Engebretson, Steven P.
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Zaffe, Davide
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (10) : 1161 - 1168
  • [2] Three-dimensional bone structure and bone mineral density evaluations of autogenous bone graft after sinus augmentation: a microcomputed tomography analysis
    Huang, Heng-Li
    Chen, Michael Y. C.
    Hsu, Jui-Ting
    Li, Yu-Fen
    Chang, Chih-Han
    Chen, Kuan-Ting
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (09) : 1098 - 1103
  • [3] The Influence of Substitute Materials on Bone Density After Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Microcomputed Tomography Study
    Kuehl, Sebastian
    Goetz, Hermann
    Brochhausen, Christoph
    Jakse, Norbert
    Filippi, Andreas
    d'Hoedt, Bernd
    Kreisler, Matthias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2012, 27 (06) : 1541 - 1546
  • [4] Automatic three-dimensional analysis of bone volume and quality change after maxillary sinus augmentation
    Kwon, Jin-Ju
    Hwang, JaeJoon
    Kim, Yong-Deok
    Shin, Sang-Hun
    Cho, Bong-Hae
    Lee, Jae-Yeol
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (06) : 1148 - 1155
  • [5] Maxillary sinus pneumatization and augmentation: A three-dimensional finite element analysis
    Jiang, Yanbo
    Gong, Ming
    Chen, Donghui
    Li, Jiaojie
    Zhou, Hailun
    Lin, Yongfeng
    Tang, Li
    MATERIALS EXPRESS, 2021, 11 (11) : 1892 - 1900
  • [6] Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Optimal Positioning of a Bone Graft Block
    Schuller-Goetzburg, Peter
    Forte, Thomas
    Pomwenger, Werner
    Petutschnigg, Alexander
    Watzinger, Franz
    Entacher, Karl
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (02):
  • [7] Three-dimensional volumetric analysis of the maxillary sinus: a cone-beam computed tomography study
    Gulec, M.
    Tassoker, M.
    Magat, G.
    Lale, B.
    Ozcan, S.
    Orhan, K.
    FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA, 2020, 79 (03) : 557 - 562
  • [8] The influence of bone substitute materials on the bone volume after maxillary sinus augmentation: a microcomputerized tomography study
    Sebastian Kühl
    Christoph Brochhausen
    Hermann Götz
    Andreas Filippi
    Michael Payer
    Bernd d’Hoedt
    Matthias Kreisler
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013, 17 : 543 - 551
  • [9] The influence of bone substitute materials on the bone volume after maxillary sinus augmentation: a microcomputerized tomography study
    Kuehl, Sebastian
    Brochhausen, Christoph
    Goetz, Hermann
    Filippi, Andreas
    Payer, Michael
    d'Hoedt, Bernd
    Kreisler, Matthias
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (02) : 543 - 551
  • [10] Three-Dimensional Volume Change of Grafted Bone in the Maxillary Sinus
    Mazzocco, Fabio
    Lops, Diego
    Gobbato, Luca
    Lolato, Alessandra
    Romeo, Eugenio
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (01) : 178 - 184