Biomass production of weeds in low-input and conventional cropping of cereals

被引:6
|
作者
Hyvönen, T [1 ]
Salonen, J [1 ]
机构
[1] MTT Agrifood Res Finland, Plant Prod Res, FIN-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01448765.2005.9755318
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Biomass production of weeds under two crop management systems was compared. The conventional system relied on artificial fertilizers and herbicides, and the other was a low-input system incorporating manure as a fertilizer without use of herbicides. A five-year crop rotation comprising rye, oat-pea, barley and two-year grasslands was used in both cropping systems. The air-dried weight of weed species and crop, as well as the crop yield, were determined each year from barley, oat-pea and rye field strips between 1992 and 2000. The total biomass of weeds and the biomass of annual weeds alone were higher in low-input cropping than in conventional cropping only in rye and barley fields. The biomass production of perennial weeds did not differ between systems in any crop. The yield and the biomass of crops was higher in conventional than in low-input cropping for each crop. In both systems perennial species dominated the weed community in most years. However, dominance of perennials as well as variation in the weed biomasses among years was more marked for conventional than for low-input cropping. The clear dominance of a perennial weed species, Elymus repens, resulted in a more skewed distribution of abundance for conventional than for low-input crop management systems. E. repens was the only species that was more abundant in conventional than in low-input cropping. The most abundant species were largely similar in both systems. In general, the species composition differed more between autumn (rye) and spring-sown crops (barley and oat-pea) than between crop management systems. The weed community of rye fields was characterized by several perennial species and some autumn germinating annuals. This pattern was observed especially in low-input fields.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 173
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Temporal trends of arthropod diversity in conventional and low-input meadows
    Jeanneret, P
    Aviron, S
    Herzog, F
    Luka, H
    Pozzi, S
    Walter, T
    Integrating Efficient Grassland Farming and Biodiversity, 2005, 10 : 344 - 347
  • [22] ON THE CONCEPT OF CONVENTIONAL AND LOW-INPUT ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS OF AGRICULTURE
    DEWES, T
    BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 1991, 69 (03): : 354 - 364
  • [23] Weeds, aphids, and specialist parasitoids and predators benefit differently from organic and conventional cropping of winter cereals
    Caballero-Lopez, Berta
    Blanco-Moreno, Jose M.
    Perez-Hidalgo, Nicolas
    Michelena-Saval, Jose M.
    Pujade-Villar, Juli
    Guerrieri, Emilio
    Sanchez-Espigares, Jose A.
    Sans, F. Xavier
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2012, 85 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [24] Weeds, aphids, and specialist parasitoids and predators benefit differently from organic and conventional cropping of winter cereals
    Berta Caballero-López
    José M. Blanco-Moreno
    Nicolás Pérez-Hidalgo
    José M. Michelena-Saval
    Juli Pujade-Villar
    Emilio Guerrieri
    José A. Sánchez-Espigares
    F. Xavier Sans
    Journal of Pest Science, 2012, 85 : 81 - 88
  • [25] Low-Input Maize-Based Cropping Systems Implementing IWM Match Conventional Maize Monoculture Productivity and Weed Control
    Adeux, Guillaume
    Giuliano, Simon
    Cordeau, Stephane
    Savoie, Jean-Marie
    Alletto, Lionel
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2017, 7 (09):
  • [26] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and species dominance in a temperate soil with long-term conventional and low-input cropping systems
    Mauritz Vestberg
    Helena Kahiluoto
    Esa Wallius
    Mycorrhiza, 2011, 21 : 351 - 361
  • [27] LOW-INPUT TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS FOR MILLET-BASED CROPPING SYSTEMS IN THE SAHEL
    KLAIJ, MC
    RENARD, C
    REDDY, KC
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1994, 30 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [28] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and species dominance in a temperate soil with long-term conventional and low-input cropping systems
    Vestberg, Mauritz
    Kahiluoto, Helena
    Wallius, Esa
    MYCORRHIZA, 2011, 21 (05) : 351 - 361
  • [29] Comparison of soil N availability and leaching potential, crop yields and weeds in organic, low-input and conventional farming systems in northern California
    Poudel, DD
    Horwath, WR
    Lanini, WT
    Temple, SR
    van Bruggen, AHC
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 90 (02) : 125 - 137
  • [30] Conventional and low-input pasture improvement - A review of recent market research
    Barr, N
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (04) : 559 - 567