Multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing a parenting intervention in prison, perceptions from deliverers and responsible managers: a mixed-methods study

被引:4
|
作者
Norman, Asa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Swahnstrom, Simon [1 ]
Karlstrom, Natalia Ulfsdotter [1 ]
Enebrink, Pia [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Global Publ Hlth, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Psychol, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Criminal; Child; Children of incarcerated parents; Child delinquency; CFIR; Correctional services; Crime prevention; Disadvantaged children; Implementation; Incarceration; Sweden; INCARCERATED MOTHERS; PROGRAMS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s40359-022-00782-z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Children of incarcerated parents run a high risk of poor health and own delinquency and positive parenting is vital for their healthy development. Internationally, parenting interventions for incarcerated parents suggest impacts on parenting and child behaviour outcomes. The intervention For Our Children's Sake (FOCS), was developed for incarcerated parents in Sweden and evaluated in a controlled trial with a parallel process evaluation during 2019-2021. This study constitutes part of the process evaluation and aims to describe barriers and facilitators for the implementation of FOCS, and how the intervention targets parents' needs, as perceived by delivering group leaders and responsible correctional inspectors. Methods In this mixed-methods study, group leaders (n = 23) and correctional inspectors (n = 12) in both intervention and control group of the FOCS trial responded to a quantitative questionnaire regarding factors of importance for intervention implementation. Group leaders (n = 12) and correctional inspectors (n = 6) in the intervention group also participated in qualitative interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and comparison of means. Qualitative data were analysed inductively using qualitative content analysis. Results A synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative results showed that the topic of parenting and child issues in general was perceived as highly important to work with in prison, and FOCS to be an important programme in specific. At the same time, the implementation of FOCS was perceived as reliant on the individual engagement of group leaders and correctional inspectors and implementation was described as a struggle due to the scarce resources that were allowed for FOCS. Thus, additional resources and support from the Prison and Probation Service's management were called for to facilitate implementation of FOCS, and to make it an automatic part of prison activities. Conclusion This study showed that there was high engagement among deliverers and managers for working with parenting in prison, where the need among parents has been described as great. Additional resources and support within the overall Prison and Probation Service, is vital to facilitate implementation of FOCS and make it sustainable within the prisons. The findings can be used to refine an implementations structure for similar interventions in the prison or similar settings.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] Barriers and facilitators for healthcare professionals to the implementation of Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations at the outpatient clinic (the MUTUAL intervention): a sequential exploratory mixed-methods study
    van Lummel, Eline V. T. J.
    Meijer, Yoeki
    Tjan, Dave H. T.
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [42] A mixed-methods study of multi-level factors influencing mammography overuse among an older ethnically diverse screening population: implications for de-implementation
    Austin, Jessica D.
    Tehranifar, Parisa
    Rodriguez, Carmen B.
    Brotzman, Laura
    Agovino, Mariangela
    Ziazadeh, Danya
    Moise, Nathalie
    Shelton, Rachel C.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [43] Opportunities and barriers to implementing antibiotic stewardship in low and middle-income countries: Lessons from a mixed-methods study in a tertiary care hospital in Ethiopia
    Gebretekle, Gebremedhin Beedemariam
    Mariam, Damen Haile
    Abebe, Workeabeba
    Amogne, Wondwossen
    Tenna, Admasu
    Fenta, Teferi Gedif
    Libman, Michael
    Yansouni, Cedric P.
    Semret, Makeda
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [44] Facilitators and barriers to the transition from outpatient clinic visits to home-based check-ups for children being treated with growth hormone: a mixed-methods study
    Remmits, Anouk J. W.
    van Mastrigt, Ghislaine A. P. G.
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    van Setten, Petra A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 183 (04) : 1857 - 1870
  • [45] Challenges and patient outcomes in chronic subdural haematoma at the level of a regional care system A multi-centre, mixed-methods study from the East of England
    Stubbs, Daniel James
    Khanna, Sam
    Davies, Benjamin M.
    Vivian, Mark E.
    Bashford, Tom
    Adatia, Krishma
    Chen, Ping
    Clarkson, Peter John
    Mcglennan, Catherine
    Indurawage, Lalani
    Patel, Martyn
    Tyagunenko, Rada
    Burnstein, Rowan
    Menon, David K.
    Hutchinson, Peter J.
    Joannides, Alexis
    AGE AND AGEING, 2024, 53 (04)
  • [46] Effects of a community-based, multi-level family planning intervention on theoretically grounded intermediate outcomes for couples in rural Uganda: Results from a mixed methods pilot evaluation
    Sileo, Katelyn M.
    Muhumuza, Christine
    Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
    Kershaw, Trace S.
    Ellerbe, Brooke
    Munoz, Suyapa
    Sekamatte, Samuel
    Lule, Haruna
    Kiene, Susan M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 29 (03) : 551 - 575
  • [47] Facilitators and barriers to the transition from outpatient clinic visits to home-based check-ups for children being treated with growth hormone: a mixed-methods study (vol 183, pg 1857, 2024)
    Remmits, Anouk J. W.
    van Mastrigt, Ghislaine A. P. G.
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    van Setten, Petra A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2025, 184 (03)