Multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing a parenting intervention in prison, perceptions from deliverers and responsible managers: a mixed-methods study

被引:4
|
作者
Norman, Asa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Swahnstrom, Simon [1 ]
Karlstrom, Natalia Ulfsdotter [1 ]
Enebrink, Pia [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Global Publ Hlth, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Psychol, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Criminal; Child; Children of incarcerated parents; Child delinquency; CFIR; Correctional services; Crime prevention; Disadvantaged children; Implementation; Incarceration; Sweden; INCARCERATED MOTHERS; PROGRAMS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s40359-022-00782-z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Children of incarcerated parents run a high risk of poor health and own delinquency and positive parenting is vital for their healthy development. Internationally, parenting interventions for incarcerated parents suggest impacts on parenting and child behaviour outcomes. The intervention For Our Children's Sake (FOCS), was developed for incarcerated parents in Sweden and evaluated in a controlled trial with a parallel process evaluation during 2019-2021. This study constitutes part of the process evaluation and aims to describe barriers and facilitators for the implementation of FOCS, and how the intervention targets parents' needs, as perceived by delivering group leaders and responsible correctional inspectors. Methods In this mixed-methods study, group leaders (n = 23) and correctional inspectors (n = 12) in both intervention and control group of the FOCS trial responded to a quantitative questionnaire regarding factors of importance for intervention implementation. Group leaders (n = 12) and correctional inspectors (n = 6) in the intervention group also participated in qualitative interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and comparison of means. Qualitative data were analysed inductively using qualitative content analysis. Results A synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative results showed that the topic of parenting and child issues in general was perceived as highly important to work with in prison, and FOCS to be an important programme in specific. At the same time, the implementation of FOCS was perceived as reliant on the individual engagement of group leaders and correctional inspectors and implementation was described as a struggle due to the scarce resources that were allowed for FOCS. Thus, additional resources and support from the Prison and Probation Service's management were called for to facilitate implementation of FOCS, and to make it an automatic part of prison activities. Conclusion This study showed that there was high engagement among deliverers and managers for working with parenting in prison, where the need among parents has been described as great. Additional resources and support within the overall Prison and Probation Service, is vital to facilitate implementation of FOCS and make it sustainable within the prisons. The findings can be used to refine an implementations structure for similar interventions in the prison or similar settings.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing a parenting intervention in prison, perceptions from deliverers and responsible managers: a mixed-methods study
    Åsa Norman
    Simon Swahnström
    Natalia Ulfsdotter Karlström
    Pia Enebrink
    BMC Psychology, 10
  • [2] Participating in a parenting intervention in prison, perceptions from incarcerated fathers and mothers-A convergent mixed-methods study
    Norman, Asa
    Enebrink, Pia
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [3] Implementing a multi-level intervention to improve tobacco use treatment for cancer patients: A mixed-methods study
    Theis, Ryan
    LeLaurin, Jennifer
    Chetram, Deandra
    Dallery, Jesse
    Silver, Natalie
    Markhan, Merry-Jennifer
    Staras, Stephanie
    Gurka, Matthew
    Salloum, Ramzi
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15
  • [5] Shared decision-making needs, barriers, and facilitators of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer in the hospital: a multi-level, mixed-methods study
    Reyes, Kevin R.
    Wong, Paul
    Petrofsky, Mary
    Dai, Annie
    Pelayo, Alyson
    Brondfield, Sam
    Kwon, Daniel H.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (05)
  • [6] A new mixed methods approach to uncover multi-level barriers and facilitators of cancer survivorship.
    Kieber-Emmons, Autumn
    Crabtree, Benjamin F.
    Miller, William
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (07)
  • [7] Barriers and facilitators to implementing adaptive trial designs in paediatric critical care: an international mixed-methods study
    Patricia Gilholm
    Ken Wu
    Renate Le Marsney
    Kristen Gibbons
    Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal, 2 (1):
  • [8] The barriers and facilitators to implementing dementia education and training in health and social care services: a mixed-methods study
    Surr, Claire A.
    Parveen, Sahdia
    Smith, Sarah J.
    Drury, Michelle
    Sass, Cara
    Burden, Sarah
    Oyebode, Jan
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [9] The barriers and facilitators to implementing dementia education and training in health and social care services: a mixed-methods study
    Claire A. Surr
    Sahdia Parveen
    Sarah J. Smith
    Michelle Drury
    Cara Sass
    Sarah Burden
    Jan Oyebode
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [10] Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing High-Intensity Gait Training in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Mbalilaki, Julia Aneth
    Lilleheie, Ingvild
    Rimehaug, Stein A.
    Tveitan, Siri N.
    Linnestad, Anne-Margrethe
    Kroll, Pia
    Lundberg, Simen
    Molle, Marianne
    Moore, Jennifer L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (13)