Effects of embryo retention during embryo transfer on IVF outcomes

被引:3
|
作者
Kadour-Peero, Einav [1 ,2 ]
Tulandi, Togas [1 ,2 ]
Feferkorn, Ido [1 ,2 ]
Hiszkiahu, Ranit [1 ,2 ]
Buckett, William [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, MUHC Reprod Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Embryo; Embryo transfer; Embryo retention; Pregnancy; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS; RETAINED EMBRYOS;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-022-02450-y
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Propose To investigate embryo retention (ER) rate in embryo transfer (ET) cycles and its effects on reproductive outcomes in a large database. Methods A matched retrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic hospital-based reproductive center. A total of 15,321 ET cycles were performed from January 2008 to December 2018. Each woman was matched with three separate control subjects of the same age (+/- 1 year), embryo condition, main causes of infertility, and type of protocol used for fresh or frozen ET cycles. The main outcomes were ER rate, and implantation, clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and live birth rates. Results The overall incidence of ER was 1.4% (213/15,321). There was no difference in the rate of ER rate in fresh ET cycles compared with frozen transfer cycles (P = 0.54). We matched 188/213 (88%) of cases in the ER group to 564 non-ER cases. There were no cases of the blood in the catheter seen in the ER group. Pregnancy outcomes were similar between the ER and the non-ER cycles: clinical pregnancy rate (31.3% vs. 36.1%, P = 0.29), implantation rate (26.2% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.2), live birth rate (20.3% vs. 24%, P = 0.53), ectopic pregnancy rate (0.5% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.18), and miscarriage rate (10.7% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.53). Conclusion Our results suggest that ER rate does not affect the reproductive outcomes including clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate. Patients and physicians should not be concerned about the retention of embryos during transfer since there is no effect on pregnancy outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1065 / 1068
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NO DIFFERENCE IN IVF OR PREGNANCY OUTCOMES WITH USE OF DIAZEPAM AT TIME OF EMBRYO TRANSFER
    Fitz, V. W.
    Hammer, K.
    Souter, I
    Bormann, C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (01) : E40 - E40
  • [22] Sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and IVF outcomes: a systematic review
    Zhang, Jianeng
    Wang, Chong
    Zhang, Huanhuan
    Zhou, Yan
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [23] The utility of embryo quality and transfer quality scores as predictors of IVF outcomes
    Deenihan, BJ
    Ball, GD
    Tjaden, BL
    Giainger, DA
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 : S222 - S223
  • [24] Sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and IVF outcomes: a systematic review
    Jianeng Zhang
    Chong Wang
    Huanhuan Zhang
    Yan Zhou
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 19
  • [25] The choice of embryo transfer catheter affects embryo implantation after IVF
    Meriano, J
    Weissman, A
    Greenblatt, EM
    Ward, S
    Casper, RF
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (04) : 678 - 682
  • [26] Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET
    Kang, Sang Min
    Lee, Sang Won
    Jeong, Hak Jun
    Yoon, San Hyun
    Koh, Min Whan
    Lim, Jin Ho
    Lee, Seong Goo
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2012, 29 (05) : 423 - 428
  • [27] A novel grading system for the assessment of embryo transfer quality in IVF-embryo transfer
    Eisermann, J.
    Riley, E.
    LaPalme, J.
    Collazo, I
    Bustillo, M.
    Thompson, K.
    Wood, E.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 71 - 71
  • [28] Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET
    Sang Min Kang
    Sang Won Lee
    Hak Jun Jeong
    San Hyun Yoon
    Min Whan Koh
    Jin Ho Lim
    Seong Goo Lee
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2012, 29 : 423 - 428
  • [29] Speculum retention during embryo transfer does not improve pregnancy rates following embryo transfer - a randomized study
    Amui, J.
    Check, J. H.
    Brasile, D.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 38 (04): : 333 - 334
  • [30] A randomized clinical trial comparing Minimal Stimulation IVF with single embryo transfer to conventional IVF with double embryo transfer
    Zhang, J.
    Feret, M.
    Luk, J.
    Repping, S.
    Bodri, D.
    Chang, L.
    Yang, M.
    Nejat, E.
    Chavez, A.
    van der Veen, F.
    van Wely, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 : 329 - 330