Differences in Reaction to Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers for Multiple-Choice and Open-Ended Questions

被引:13
|
作者
Attali, Yigal [1 ]
Laitusis, Cara [1 ]
Stone, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Testing Serv, Rosedale Rd,MS-10-R, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
关键词
multiple-choice; open-ended; feedback; reliability; test design; MONETARY INCENTIVES; PERFORMANCE; TESTS; RELIABILITY; EQUIVALENCE; HYPOTHESIS; SCORES; ALPHA;
D O I
10.1177/0013164415612548
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
There are many reasons to believe that open-ended (OE) and multiple-choice (MC) items elicit different cognitive demands of students. However, empirical evidence that supports this view is lacking. In this study, we investigated the reactions of test takers to an interactive assessment with immediate feedback and answer-revision opportunities for the two types of items. Eighth-grade students solved mathematics problems, both MC and OE, with standard instructions and feedback-and-revision opportunities. An analysis of scores based on revised answers in feedback mode revealed gains in measurement precision for OE items but not for MC items. These results are explained through the concept of effortful engagementthe OE format encourages more mindful engagement with the items in interactive mode. This interpretation is supported by analyses of response times and test takers' reports.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 802
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change
    Tvinnereim E.
    Fløttum K.
    Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 (8) : 744 - 747
  • [42] Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change
    Tvinnereim, Endre
    Flottum, Kjersti
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (08) : 744 - U158
  • [43] Do open-ended and discrete choice questions differ due to anchoring effects?
    Frykblom, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (05) : 1727 - 1727
  • [44] RESPONDING TO FEEDBACK AFTER MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWERS - THE INFLUENCE OF RESPONSE CONFIDENCE
    STOCK, WA
    KULHAVY, RW
    PRIDEMORE, DR
    KRUG, D
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 45 (04): : 649 - 667
  • [45] The Use of Open-Ended Questions with Giving Feedback (OEQGF) for Effective Mathematic Learning
    Sabilah, I.
    Manoy, J. T.
    MATHEMATICS, INFORMATICS, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (MISEIC), 2018, 947
  • [46] Innovating the collection of open-ended answers: The linguistic and content characteristics of written and oral answers to political attitude questions
    Gavras, Konstantin
    Hoehne, Jan Karem
    Blom, Annelies G.
    Schoen, Harald
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2022, 185 (03) : 872 - 890
  • [47] Multiple-Choice versus Open-Ended Questions in Advanced Clinical Neuroanatomy: Using a National Neuroanatomy Assessment to Investigate Variability in Performance Using Different Question Types
    Merzougui, Wassim H.
    Myers, Matthew A.
    Hall, Samuel
    Elmansouri, Ahmad
    Parker, Rob
    Robson, Alistair D.
    Kurn, Octavia
    Parrott, Rachel
    Geoghegan, Kate
    Harrison, Charlotte H.
    Anbu, Deepika
    Dean, Oliver
    Border, Scott
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2021, 14 (03) : 296 - 305
  • [48] THE RELATIONSHIP OF EXPERT-SYSTEM SCORED CONSTRAINED FREE-RESPONSE ITEMS TO MULTIPLE-CHOICE AND OPEN-ENDED ITEMS
    BENNETT, RE
    ROCK, DA
    BRAUN, HI
    FRYE, D
    SPOHRER, JC
    SOLOWAY, E
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1990, 14 (02) : 151 - 162
  • [49] Student- versus teacher-generated explanations for answers to online multiple-choice questions: What are the differences?
    Yu, Fu-Yun
    Chen, Chiao-Yi
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2021, 173
  • [50] SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT: COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO MULTIPLE CHOICE CONCEPTUAL QUESTIONS AND OPEN-ENDED FINAL EXAM PROBLEMS
    Wage, Kathleen E.
    Buck, John R.
    Hjalmarson, Margret A.
    Nelson, Jill K.
    2011 IEEE DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING WORKSHOP AND IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING EDUCATION WORKSHOP (DSP/SPE), 2011, : 198 - 203