Rapid Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

被引:20
|
作者
De, Ashmita [1 ]
Sun, Hongfu [1 ]
Emery, Derek J. [2 ]
Butcher, Kenneth S. [3 ]
Wilman, Alan H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Biomed Engn, 1098 RTF, Edmonton, AB T6G 2V2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Div Neurol, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
TISSUE; MAP;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.26850
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) offers a means to track iron evolution in hemorrhage. However, standard QSM sequences have long acquisition times and are prone to motion artifact in hemorrhagic patients. Purpose: To minimize motion artifact and acquisition time by performing rapid QSM in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) using single-shot echo planar imaging (EPI). Study Type: Prospective method evaluation. Population/Subjects: Forty-five hemorrhages were analyzed from 35 MRI exams obtained between February 2016 and March 2019 from 27 patients (14 male / 13 female, age: 71 +/- 12 years) with confirmed primary ICH. Field Strength/Sequence: 3T; susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) with 4.54-minute acquisition and 2D single-shot gradient EPI with 0.45-minute acquisition. Assessment: Susceptibility maps were constructed from both methods. Measurement of ICH area and mean magnetic susceptibility were made manually by three independent observers. Motion artifacts were quantified using the magnitude signal ratio of artifact-to-brain tissue to classify into three categories: mild or no artifact, moderate artifact, or severe artifact. The cutoff for each category was determined by four observers. Statistical Tests: Pearson's correlation coefficient and paired t-test using alpha = 0.05 were used to compare results. Inter- and intraclass correlation was used to assess observer variability. Results: Using 45 hemorrhages, the ICH regions measured on susceptibility maps obtained from EPI and SWI sequences had high correlation coefficients for area (R-2 >= 0.97) and mean magnetic susceptibility (R-2 >= 0.93) for all observers. The artifact-to-tissue ratio was significantly higher (P < 0.01) for SWI vs. EPI, and the standard deviation for the SWI method (SD = 0.05) was much larger than EPI (SD = 0.01). All observers' measurements showed high agreement. Data Conclusion: Single-shot EPI-QSM enabled rapid measurement of ICH area and mean magnetic susceptibility, with reduced motion as compared with more standard SWI. EPI-QSM requires minimal additional acquisition time and could be incorporated into iron tracking studies in ICH.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 718
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF CEREBRAL EDEMA IN MASSIVE SPONTANEOUS INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE
    CLASEN, RA
    PANDOLFI, S
    LAING, I
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1975, 78 (01): : A18 - A18
  • [32] Quantitative Assessment of Neurobehavioral Measures in Rat Models of Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    Yager, Brock
    Kondrasov, Sasha
    Xiang, Zhidan
    Diz, Debra I.
    Wolfe, Stacey Q.
    STROKE-VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [33] Serial quantitative neuroimaging of iron in the intracerebral hemorrhage pig model
    Haque, Muhammad E.
    Gabr, Refaat E.
    Zhao, Xiurong
    Hasan, Khader M.
    Valenzuela, Andrew
    Narayana, Ponnada A.
    Ting, Shun-Ming
    Sun, Guanghua
    Savitz, Sean I.
    Aronowski, Jaroslaw
    JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 2018, 38 (03): : 375 - 381
  • [34] Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications
    Reichenbach, J. R.
    Schweser, F.
    Serres, B.
    Deistung, A.
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 : 225 - 230
  • [35] Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in the human Placenta
    Graewert, Stephanie
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2021, 193 (11):
  • [36] Quantitative susceptibility mapping evaluation of glioma
    Zeng, Shanmei
    Ma, Hui
    Xie, Dingxiang
    Huang, Yingqian
    Wang, Mengzhu
    Zeng, Wenting
    Zhu, Nengjin
    Ma, Zuliwei
    Yang, Zhiyun
    Chu, Jianping
    Zhao, Jing
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (10) : 6636 - 6647
  • [37] Sparse Methods for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
    Bilgic, Berkin
    Chatnuntawech, Itthi
    Langkammer, Christian
    Setsompop, Kawin
    WAVELETS AND SPARSITY XVI, 2015, 9597
  • [38] Inverse Problem in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
    Choi, Jae Kyu
    Park, Hyoung Suk
    Wang, Shuai
    Wang, Yi
    Seo, Jin Keun
    SIAM JOURNAL ON IMAGING SCIENCES, 2014, 7 (03): : 1669 - 1689
  • [39] Thin slab quantitative susceptibility mapping
    Naji, Nashwan
    Wilman, Alan
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 90 (06) : 2290 - 2305
  • [40] Usefulness of quantitative susceptibility mapping in ALS
    Warner, Robin
    NEUROLOGY, 2022, 98 (18)