Design and evaluation of a cognitive health education pilot program according to the RE-AIM framework

被引:0
|
作者
Yuan, Manqiong [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Xiao [2 ]
Wang, Yifan [2 ]
Han, Yaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Rongmu [2 ]
Fu, Hanhan [2 ]
Fang, Ya [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, State Key Lab Mol Vaccinol & Mol Diagnost, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Key Lab Hlth Technol Assessment Fujian Prov, Xiamen, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 12期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; OLDER-ADULTS; RISK-FACTOR; DEMENTIA; IMPAIRMENT; PEOPLE; INTERVENTION; PREVALENCE; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0260934
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Most formats of currently used community-based health education for cognitive impairment prevention are limited to one-way communication, such as distributing leaflets, pasting posters, or holding a lecture, and they lack comprehensive evaluation. Here we aim to design, test, and evaluate a novel pilot cognitive health education program combined with psychosocial interventions (CHECPI). Methods We designed the CHECPI program and tested it among adults aged 60 and over in an aging-friendly community in 2018. Multidimensional cognitive functions were measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) before and three months after the CHECPI program. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed based on the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework to evaluate the program. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to assess changes in multidimensional cognitive functions. Results The CHECPI program was comprised of 12 courses and introduced 5 kinds of psychosocial interventions. Reach: 28 older adults participated in the program, of whom most were female (n = 22) and younger elderly with an average age of 65.32 years. Effectiveness: 19 participants finished >= 6 courses as well as the follow-up survey. Although their MoCA scores did not improve significantly, they had increased their visuospatial ability significantly (with the average score increasing by 0.42). Adoption: the community officers, lecturers, and participants highly recommended the program, but they agreed that the lack of professional instructors may hinder its popularization. Implementation: the program was implemented in full accordance with the pre-program design. Maintenance: three months after the program, 17 participants had maintained at least one of the seven healthy behaviors that were introduced in the program. Conclusions Younger female elderly were more willing to participate in the program. It enhanced participants' visuospatial ability, but a sufficient number of professional instructors are crucial for large-scale promotion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PROGRAM EVALUATION OF GLA:D® GERMANY: A MIXED-METHODS: STUDY USING THE RE-AIM QUEST FRAMEWORK
    Bahns, Carolin
    Bremer, Alexander
    Napierala-Komp, Simone
    Hauke, Jeannine
    Menke, Chiara J.
    Glaubitz, Andreas
    Kopkow, Christian
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 : S530 - S531
  • [42] Application of a RE-AIM Evaluation Framework to Test Integration of a Mindfulness Based Parenting Intervention into a Drug Treatment Program
    Meghan A. Gannon
    Michael Mackenzie
    Dennis J. Hand
    Vanessa Short
    Diane Abatemarco
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2019, 23 : 298 - 306
  • [43] Applying The RE-AIM Framework To The Health Promotion Policy In Toyooka City.
    Nishida, Shohei
    Sato, Shinji
    Otsuki, Shingo
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2020, 52 (07) : 281 - 281
  • [44] SELECTING AN EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR COMMUNITY BASED INTERVENTIONS: RE-AIM IN RURAL GEORGIA
    Aflonso, Moya L.
    Spell, Charlotte
    Spencer, Joanna
    Scott, Alison
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2012, 43 : S106 - S106
  • [45] A process evaluation of the walking in ScHools (WISH) study using the RE-AIM framework
    Carlin, Angela
    Doherty, Leanne C.
    O'Kane, S. Maria
    Jago, Russell
    Lahart, Ian M.
    Mcdermott, Gary
    Faulkner, Maria
    Gallagher, Alison M.
    Murphy, Marie H.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [46] RE-AIM evaluation of accreditation process in Turkey
    Altintas, Levent
    Alimoglu, Mustafa Kemal
    Senol, Yesim
    Durak, Halil Ibrahim
    Sayek, Iskender
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [47] Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources
    Holtrop, Jodi Summers
    Estabrooks, Paul A.
    Gaglio, Bridget
    Harden, Samantha M.
    Kessler, Rodger S.
    King, Diane K.
    Kwan, Bethany M.
    Ory, Marcia G.
    Rabin, Borsika A.
    Shelton, Rachel C.
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [48] Application of the RE-AIM Framework for the Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation and Management Intervention: A Study Protocol for Program Evaluation
    Tucker, Paula W.
    Bull, Rachel
    Hall, Alex
    Moran, Tim P.
    Jain, Shabnam
    Sathian, Usha
    Simon, Harold K.
    Gioia, Gerard A.
    Ratcliff, Jonathan J.
    Wright, David W.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 9
  • [49] Pilot Process Evaluation of the Supporting Older Adults at Risk Model: A RE-AIM Approach
    Trotta, Rebecca L.
    Shoemaker, Anne E.
    Greysen, S. Ryan
    Boltz, Marie
    JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2024, 46 (04) : e26 - e39
  • [50] Implementing medicare education for medication access: A review of the literature using the RE-AIM framework
    Cooper, Julie B.
    Scotti, Alice
    Carr, Megan L.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2023, 19 (01): : 16 - 27