On the relationship between Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for model uncertainty

被引:165
|
作者
Godsill, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Signal Proc Grp, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
关键词
Bayes; jump diffusion; model selection; reversible jump; variable selection;
D O I
10.1198/10618600152627924
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
This article considers Markov chain computational methods for incorporating uncertainty about the dimension of a parameter when performing inference within a Bayesian setting. A general class of methods is proposed for performing such computations, based upon a product space representation of the problem which is similar to that of Carlin and Chib. It is shown that all of the existing algorithms for incorporation of model uncertainty into Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) can be derived as special cases of this general class of methods. In particular, we show that the popular reversible jump method is obtained when a special form of Metropolis-Hastings (M-H) algorithm is applied to the product space. Furthermore, the Gibbs sampling method and the variable selection method are shown to derive straightforwardly from the general framework. We believe that these new relationships between methods, which were until now seen as diverse procedures, are an important aid to the understanding of MCMC model selection procedures and may assist in the future development of improved procedures. Our discussion also sheds some light upon the important issues of "pseudo-prior" selection in the case of the Carlin and Chib sampler and choice of proposal distribution in the case of reversible jump. Finally, we propose efficient reversible jump proposal schemes that take advantage of any analytic structure that may be present in the model. These proposal schemes are compared with a standard reversible jump scheme for the problem of model order uncertainty in autoregressive time series, demonstrating the improvements which can be achieved through careful choice of proposals.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 248
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Analysis of the ORYZA_V3 Model
    Tan, Junwei
    Cao, Jingjing
    Cui, Yuanlai
    Duan, Qingyun
    Gong, Wei
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2019, 111 (02) : 555 - 564
  • [32] Markov Chain Monte Carlo
    Henry, Ronnie
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 25 (12) : 2298 - 2298
  • [33] Correlations between parameters in risk models: Estimation and propagation of uncertainty by Markov Chain Monte Carlo
    Ades, AE
    Lu, G
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2003, 23 (06) : 1165 - 1172
  • [34] Monte Carlo Tennis: A Stochastic Markov Chain Model
    Newton, Paul K.
    Aslam, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN SPORTS, 2009, 5 (03)
  • [35] Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models
    Daniel W. Heck
    Antony M. Overstall
    Quentin F. Gronau
    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
    Statistics and Computing, 2019, 29 : 631 - 643
  • [36] Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models
    Heck, Daniel W.
    Overstall, Antony M.
    Gronau, Quentin F.
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2019, 29 (04) : 631 - 643
  • [37] Quantifying the uncertainty in the orbits of extrasolar planets with Markov chain Monte Carlo
    Ford, EB
    SEARCH FOR OTHER WORLDS, 2004, 713 : 27 - 30
  • [38] Confronting uncertainty in model-based geostatistics using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation
    Minasny, Budiman
    Vrugt, Jasper A.
    McBratney, Alex B.
    GEODERMA, 2011, 163 (3-4) : 150 - 162
  • [39] Performance of ensemble Kalman filter and Markov chain Monte Carlo under uncertainty in forecast model
    Patel, Rajan G.
    Jain, Tarang
    Trivedi, Japan
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 177 : 415 - 431
  • [40] Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods in human skeletal identification
    Konigsberg, Lyle W.
    Frankenberg, Susan R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2018, 165 : 144 - 144