The tutorial system: A tool to evaluate the quality of higher education

被引:5
|
作者
Nunez, Maria-Amparo [1 ]
Rodriguez, Juan-Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
来源
CULTURA Y EDUCACION | 2011年 / 23卷 / 02期
关键词
Tutorial; Systems to Ensure Inner Quality; teaching objectives; diagnostic tests;
D O I
10.1174/113564011795944686
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The "Framework for the design of degree programmes within the EHEA at the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC)" indicates that undergraduates should subscribe to a Tutorial Action Plan (TAP). The Systems to Ensure Inner Quality (SGIC), which follow the AUDIT model generated by the National Agency for Quality Assessment and Qualification (ANECA), include several processes ("to support and guide students" and "for student guidance and educational development") related with reaching learning objectives. The paper proposes that the tutoring system acquires an academic character and serves as a tool to monitor that the aims of bachelor's degree are implemented and achieved. That is, TAP is linked to accreditation and monitoring of university degrees. Engineering degrees in Spain are structured into a minimum of 4 instruction units: basic, common to engineering, specific and final year project. The authors suggest performing diagnostic tests on each one of them to evaluate the teaching-learning process. The initial period (the first year at university) is related to an initial diagnostic assessment of basic subjects. Common and specific subject units will undergo a diagnostic test, independent of the teaching departments responsible, to ensure that educational aims are being achieved. The final year project becomes a diagnostic test in itself.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 271
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A decisional tool for quality improvement in higher education
    Selmoune, Nazih
    Alimazighi, Zaia
    2008 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES: FROM THEORY TO APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1684 - 1689
  • [2] Quality and Quality in Higher Education: A Theoretical Discussion in Ecuadorian Higher Education System
    Escobar-Jimenez, C.
    Delgado, A.
    REDU-REVISTA DE DOCENCIA UNIVERSITARIA, 2019, 17 (02): : 159 - 175
  • [3] EVALUATE THE DEMOCRATIC QUALITY OF PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING PROCESSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Yanez, Pablo Pano
    PRISMA SOCIAL, 2024, (45): : 136 - 164
  • [4] THE PEER MENTORING TUTORIAL SYSTEM IN THE ORIENTATION STUDENT PROCESS AT HIGHER EDUCATION
    Calvo-Jurado, Carmen
    EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 8015 - 8019
  • [5] Higher Education Quality Supervision System
    Chen, Wen-jun
    Zong, Xiang-yu
    Xu, Ke
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (AETMS 2014), 2015, : 180 - 186
  • [6] A System for Quality Improvement in Higher Education
    LINDSTROM, JOHNNY
    European Journal of Engineering Education, 1994, 19 (03) : 255 - 261
  • [7] The Pedagogy of Higher Education: How to Evaluate the Quality of Training in Morocco to Improve it
    Riahi, Sara
    Riahi, Azzedine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY, 2018, 8 (01): : 92 - 108
  • [8] Development and Validation of a Tool To Evaluate the Quality of Medical Education Websites in Pathology
    Alyusuf, R.
    Prasad, K.
    Satir, A. Abdul
    Abalkhail, A.
    Arora, R.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 137A - 138A
  • [9] Development and Validation of a Tool To Evaluate the Quality of Medical Education Websites in Pathology
    Alyusuf, R.
    Prasad, K.
    Satir, A. Abdul
    Abalkhail, A.
    Arora, R.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 137A - 138A
  • [10] Tutorial Strategies for Written Argumentation in Higher Education
    Esperanza Mora-Monroy, Gloria
    Angel Fuerte-Blanco, Miguel
    ENUNCIACION, 2021, 26 (02): : 172 - 187