Life cycle assessment of geothermal plants targeting the lower carboniferous limestone reservoir in northern Belgium

被引:5
|
作者
Gkousis, S. [1 ]
Harcouet-Menou, V [2 ]
Damen, L. [2 ,3 ]
Welkenhuysen, K. [4 ]
Laenen, B. [2 ]
Compernolle, T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Engn Management, Prinsstr 13, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] VITO, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[3] EnergyVille, Thor Pk 8310, B-3600 Genk, Belgium
[4] Geol Survey Belgium, Royal Belgian Inst Nat Sci, Jennerstr 13, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Geothermal energy; Life cycle assessment; LCA; Global sensitivity analysis; GSA; Renewable energy; Geothermal heating; Environmental assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134142
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The majority of heating in Belgium and Europe originates from natural gas. Deep geothermal heating (DGH) can provide a low carbon alternative to fossil-fired heating. However, the site-specific geological conditions are determinant for DGH development, requiring in-depth assessments to fully understand the potential environ-mental impacts. This study presents a comprehensive environmental assessment of DGH in Northern Belgium, where growing interest in DGH is observed. Based on an already developed DGH plant, three scenarios are defined depicting current and future DGH developments in Northern Belgium. Twelve Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) impact indicators and the inter-connected geo-technical aspects are investigated. An LCA on the three scenarios is performed, followed by a detailed hotspot analysis. Also, the impact variability is estimated with global sensitivity analysis, followed by variance-based global sensitivity analysis to assess this variability. The global warming (GW) impact of the already developed DGH plant is relatively low (27 kg CO2-eq/MWhth) and is driven (>80%) by the electricity consumed to run the pumps and the well development. The GW impact is lower for the expected future DGH development (11 kg CO2-eq/MWhth) because of shallower reservoir conditions and better permeability that lead to lower pumping needs. A wide impact variability is found, governed (>80%) by the plant capacity, capacity factor and pumping needs. The GW impact ranges from 4 to 130 kg CO2-eq/MWhth. Utilization of DGH in Northern Belgium can lead to a decarbonized heating mix. The environmental impacts of DGH can be reduced by exploiting shallower reservoirs with better permeability to reduce the impacts of well development and the pumping needs of the plant and by supplying the plant with renewable energy sources.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment and valuation of the packaging waste recycling system in Belgium
    Ferreira, S.
    Cabral, M.
    De Jaeger, Simon
    Da Cruz, Nuno F.
    Simoes, P.
    Marques, R. C.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 19 (01) : 144 - 154
  • [22] Comparative life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation systems in China
    Wang, Yongzhen
    Du, Yanping
    Wang, Junyao
    Zhao, Jun
    Deng, Shuai
    Yin, Hongmei
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 155
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation technologies: An updated review
    Tomasini-Montenegro, C.
    Santoyo-Castelazo, E.
    Gujba, H.
    Romero, R. J.
    Santoyo, E.
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 114 : 1119 - 1136
  • [24] Life cycle assessment and valuation of the packaging waste recycling system in Belgium
    S. Ferreira
    M. Cabral
    Simon De Jaeger
    Nuno F. Da Cruz
    P. Simões
    R. C. Marques
    Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2017, 19 : 144 - 154
  • [25] The hourly life cycle carbon footprint of electricity generation in Belgium, bringing a temporal resolution in life cycle assessment
    Messagie, Maarten
    Mertens, Jan
    Oliveira, Luis
    Rangaraju, Surendraprabu
    Sanfelix, Javier
    Coosemans, Thierry
    Van Mierlo, Joeri
    Macharis, Cathy
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 134 : 469 - 476
  • [26] Life Cycle Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Ireland
    McNamara, Greg
    Fitzsimons, Lorna
    Horrigan, Matthew
    Phelan, Thomas
    Delaure, Yan
    Corcoran, Brian
    Doherty, Edelle
    Clifford, Eoghan
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2016, 4 (03): : 216 - 233
  • [27] Mini CHP Plants Life Cycle Ecological Assessment
    Sosnina, Elena
    Masleeva, Olga
    Kryukov, Evgeny
    Erdili, Natalya
    2020 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES EUROPE (ISGT-EUROPE 2020): SMART GRIDS: KEY ENABLERS OF A GREEN POWER SYSTEM, 2020, : 319 - 323
  • [28] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF MODERN WIND POWER PLANTS
    Hapke, Hannes M.
    Haapala, Karl R.
    Wu, Zhaohui
    Brekken, Ted K. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, DETC 2010, VOL 6, 2010, : 395 - 403
  • [29] Comparative life cycle assessment of water treatment plants
    Bonton, Alexandre
    Bouchard, Christian
    Barbeau, Benoit
    Jedrzejak, Stephane
    DESALINATION, 2012, 284 : 42 - 54
  • [30] Life cycle impact assessment and life cycle cost assessment for centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants in Thailand
    Talang, Rutjaya Prateep Na
    Sirivithayapakorn, Sanya
    Polruang, Sucheela
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)