Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature

被引:25
|
作者
Gao, Lufen [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zhongwei [2 ]
Zhang, Xian [1 ]
Zhou, Na [1 ]
Huang, Xinke [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 613 Huangpudadao West, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Tower Block Level 12, Singapore 119228, Singapore
关键词
Cesarean scar pregnancy; Reproductive outcomes; Placenta accreta; Live-births; Infertility; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; PLACENTA-PREVIA; SECTION SCAR; DIAGNOSIS; ACCRETA; WOMEN; CURETTAGE; DILATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.039
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) in our center and review of published literature on CSP and subsequent reproductive issues. Methods: Over a 3-year period, 28 cases of CSPs were diagnosed in our hospital. Follow up data of 22 cases were available which included the gestational age at diagnosis of CSP, treatments employed and outcomes of previous cesarean scar pregnancy. We also had details on subsequent fertility outcomes in these women, which included intervals between the previous CSP and subsequent pregnancy, maternal and neonatal outcomes of these subsequent pregnancies and mode of delivery. Results: Eight women desired to conceive and amongst them, seven women manage to conceive spontaneously. There were five pregnancies delivered at term, two miscarriages and one recurrent CSP. One patient had placenta accreta diagnosed at cesarean section at term and had massive hemorrhage. The remaining 4 term pregnancies were delivered uneventfully by elective cesarean sections. The mean interval between the cesarean scar pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy was 24.6 months (range 9-48 months). One patient experienced secondary infertility and despite thorough investigations, no abnormalities were detected. One of the women who did not desire future fertility conceived spontaneously at 9 and 18 months respectively after one CSP and had induced abortions twice. There were 3 women who had uterine scar defect repaired, only 1 resulted in a live birth but had placenta accreta with a lower uterine segment defect and suffered from massive hemorrhage, one woman had a subsequent miscarriage with a diverticulum in the lower uterine segment, and one woman had unexplained secondary infertility. Conclusion: Most women were able to conceive following CSPs. Reproductive outcomes included normal intrauterine term pregnancy, miscarriage, recurrent CSP, and infertility. Placenta accreta, which could be misdiagnosed antenatally, was a serious complication in subsequent pregnancies. Diverticulum or defect in the lower uterine segment could happen after CSP. Repair of the uterine defect, following a CSP neither guaranteed the healing of the scar, nor the ability to ensure a safe pregnancy outcome. Appropriate counseling to women desiring fertility with a history of CSP is essential and once they conceive early referral to tertiary centers for follow up is pertinent. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy
    Morlando, Maddalena
    Conte, Anna
    Schiattarella, Antonio
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 91
  • [32] Hysteroscopic treatment and reproductive outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: experience at a single institution
    Tang, Qin
    Qin, Yan
    Zhou, Qin
    Tang, Junying
    Qiao, Jian
    Shu, Chunmei
    Dai, Xuelin
    Zhang, Jing
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (06) : 1559 - 1566
  • [33] Hemodynamically stable despite ruptured cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review
    Gurjar, Bhakti
    Wankhede, Sachin
    Saha, Indrakshi
    Narayan, Gaurang
    Rusho, Maher Ali
    Budair, Mayar Moustafa
    Wei, Calvin R.
    Mousa, Hazem Mohamed
    Naaz, Farheen
    Rizvi, Syeda Vilay Zehra
    Rizvi, Syeda Umme Abiha
    Fatima, Sabika
    Akilimali, Aymar
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2025, 87 (03): : 1646 - 1651
  • [34] Case Series: Medical Versus Surgical Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
    Kadesh, Amanda
    Liao, Connie
    Sangal, Alisha
    Davis, Patricia C.
    Wieczorek, William E.
    DeFilippis, David J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (5S): : 14S - 14S
  • [35] Scar Endometriosis: A Case Series and Review of Literature
    Rao, C. V. Lakshmi
    Sumalatha, B.
    Swathi, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2015, 3 (04) : 179 - 182
  • [36] Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
    Gonzalez, Natalia
    Tulandi, Togas
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : 731 - 738
  • [37] Cesarean Scar Pregnancy - Case Report
    Dragomir, Ramona
    Badea, Anca
    Bodog, Alin
    Bobirca, Anca
    Banceanu, Gabriel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH CONGRESS OF THE ROMANIAN SOCIETY FOR MINIMAL INVASIVE SURGERY IN GINECOLOGY / ANNUAL DAYS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MOTHER AND CHILD HEALTH ALESSANDRESCU-RUSESCU, 2019, : 224 - 227
  • [38] Cesarean scar pregnancy: a case report
    Li, SP
    Wang, W
    Tang, XL
    Wang, Y
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 117 (02) : 316 - 317
  • [39] A case of recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy
    Mabuchi, Seiji
    Kawase, Chiaki
    Muraji, Miho
    Kanagawa, Takeshi
    Kimura, Tadashi
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 88 (09) : 1058 - 1060
  • [40] Cesarean scar pregnancy:a case report
    李胜平
    汪溦
    唐小丽
    王瑛
    ChineseMedicalJournal, 2004, (02)