Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial

被引:15
|
作者
Harris, Ian A. [1 ]
Khoo, Oliver K. [1 ]
Young, Jane M. [2 ]
Solomon, Michael J. [2 ]
Rae, Hamish [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[2] Surg Outcome Res Ctr, Liverpool, NSW 2150, Australia
关键词
lottery incentive; response rate; questionnaire; survey; mail; trauma;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Our study aimed to examine the effect of an instant lottery ticket incentive on the response rate to a mailed questionnaire in a population of trauma patients. Study Design and Setting: A randomized controlled trial at a major trauma center with 728 patients randomized into 2 groups prior to mailing of a questionnaire. One group of patients (Group A) had a sentence inserted into the cover letter stating that they would receive a $4 instant lottery ticket upon receipt of a completed questionnaire; Group B did not have an incentive. The response rate for both groups was measured after the initial mailing and at the end of the study. The results were analyzed using the X-2 test to compare 2 proportions and a P value of .05 was considered significant. Results: The early response rate in Group A was lower than in Group B, and the response rates for both groups were similar at final follow-up. The differences at both time periods were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The use of an instant lottery ticket incentive did not improve the response rate to a mailed questionnaire. 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 610
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incentives to Improve Government Agricultural Extension Agent Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Bangladesh
    Alam, Md. Rajibul
    Kijima, Yoko
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2024, 72 (03) : 1295 - 1316
  • [42] Lottery incentives for smoking cessation at the workplace: design and protocol of the smoke-free lottery - a cluster randomized trial
    Koen van der Swaluw
    Marieke Hiemstra
    Mattijs Lambooij
    Eline Roordink
    Nina van der Vliet
    Else Zantinge
    Karin Proper
    Marcel Zeelenberg
    Henriette M. Prast
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [43] A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Lottery-Based Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Overweight and Obese Adults
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Rosin, Roy
    Bellamy, Scarlett L.
    Small, Dylan S.
    Heuer, Jack
    Sproat, Susan
    Hyson, Chris
    Haff, Nancy
    Lee, Samantha M.
    Wesby, Lisa
    Hoffer, Karen
    Shuttleworth, David
    Taylor, Devon H.
    Hilbert, Victoria
    Zhu, Jingsan
    Yang, Lin
    Wang, Xingmei
    Asch, David A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2018, 32 (07) : 1568 - 1575
  • [44] An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey: a randomized trial
    Carey, Renee N.
    Reid, Alison
    Driscoll, Timothy R.
    Glass, Deborah C.
    Benke, Geza
    Fritschi, Lin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (12) : 1417 - 1421
  • [45] Phone prompt or mailed reminder for increasing response rate among investigators? A randomized trial in the Sentinelles network
    Czernichow, S
    Flahault, A
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2001, 49 (01): : 93 - 94
  • [46] Reducing occupational psychological distress: a randomized controlled trial of a mailed intervention
    Holt, Jackie
    Del Mar, Chris
    HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2006, 21 (04) : 501 - 507
  • [47] The effect of a voucher incentive on a survey response rate in the clinical setting: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
    Dawid Pieper
    Nina Kotte
    Peggy Ober
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [48] The effect of a voucher incentive on a survey response rate in the clinical setting: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
    Pieper, Dawid
    Kotte, Nina
    Ober, Peggy
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [49] Does it pay to pay? A randomized trial of prepaid financial incentives and lottery incentives in surveys of nonphysician healthcare professionals
    Ulrich, CM
    Danis, M
    Koziol, D
    Garrett-Mayer, E
    Hubbard, R
    Grady, C
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2005, 54 (03) : 178 - 183
  • [50] Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate
    Byrne, Christopher M.
    Harrison, James D.
    Young, Jane M.
    Selby, Warwick S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (12) : 1312 - 1314