Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer

被引:11
|
作者
Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Nyaboe [1 ]
Tosev, Georgi [1 ]
Damgov, Ivan [2 ]
Reimold, Philipp [1 ]
Aksoy, Cem [1 ]
Hatiboglu, Gencay [1 ]
Teber, Dogu [1 ]
Mansour, Josef [1 ]
Kuehhas, Franklin Emmanuel [3 ]
Radtke, Jan Philipp [1 ,4 ]
Hohenfellner, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Urol, Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Freelance Stat Consultant, Sofia, Bulgaria
[3] Stadiongasse 6-8-30, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[4] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Prostatectomy; Robotics; Urinary incontinence; Aged; URINARY CONTINENCE; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; INCONTINENCE; SUSPENSION; POTENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-019-02797-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze urinary continence outcome following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for aggressive prostate cancer in men aged >= 70 and < 70 years. Methods Retrospective analyses of prospectively collected long-term data from a monocentric cohort of 350 men with D'Amico high-risk prostate cancer undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single institution between 2005 and 2016. The association between time since operation and zero-pad urinary continence recovery was comparatively analyzed by separate pre-operative and post-operative Cox proportional-hazard regression models. Results Median age in the age group >= 70 years was 73 years compared with 62 years in the < 70 year age group. Distribution of men receiving adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy/hormonal therapy was similar in both age groups. Urinary continence recovery rate at 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery of men aged >= 70 years was 66, 79 and 83%, respectively, and statistically similar to that of men < 70 years: 71, 81, and 85% (log-rank test p = 0.24). Multivariable analyses demonstrated no significant difference in return to continence between the two age groups (p = 0.28 and p = 0.17). In addition, clinical stage and type of nerve sparing (unilateral, bilateral or non-nerve sparing) were found to be independently predictive of pad-free continence recovery. Conclusions Regardless of age, return to continence in men with aggressive prostate cancer undergoing RARP continues to improve way beyond the first 12 months after surgery. Considering the dire effects of post-operative radiotherapy on continence in this aggressive cancer cohort, advanced age alone should not discourage recommending multimodal therapy involving RARP.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 360
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PERIOPERATIVE, FUNCTIONAL AND ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN MEN 70 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Giedelman, Camilo
    Muhsin, Haidar Abdul
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Coelho, Rafael
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Patel, Vipul
    Ebra, George
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E612 - E612
  • [42] Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin Among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Qu, Wugong
    Yu, Shuanbao
    Tao, Jin
    Dong, Biao
    Fan, Yafeng
    Du, Haopeng
    Deng, Haotian
    Liu, Junxiao
    Zhang, Xuepei
    CANCER CONTROL, 2021, 28
  • [43] Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Samer L. Traboulsi
    David-Dan Nguyen
    Ahmed S. Zakaria
    Kyle W. Law
    Hanna Shahine
    Malek Meskawi
    Cristina Negrean
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    Assaad El Hakim
    Kevin C. Zorn
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 2791 - 2798
  • [44] Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Traboulsi, Samer L.
    Nguyen, David-Dan
    Zakaria, Ahmed S.
    Law, Kyle W.
    Shahine, Hanna
    Meskawi, Malek
    Negrean, Cristina
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    El Hakim, Assaad
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (11) : 2791 - 2798
  • [45] AGE-ADJUSTED PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SEPTUAGENARIANS UNDERGOING ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY DOES NOT PREDICT PATHOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Yates, J.
    Pareek, G.
    Elsamra, S.
    Sawczuk, I.
    Haleblian, G.
    Munver, R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A247 - A248
  • [46] Development of a model to predict prostate cancer at the apex (PCAP model) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Cumarasamy, Shivaram
    Martini, Alberto
    Falagario, Ugo G.
    Gul, Zeynep
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Jayaratna, Isuru
    Haines, George K., III
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    Tewari, Ash
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 813 - 819
  • [47] Development of a model to predict prostate cancer at the apex (PCAP model) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Shivaram Cumarasamy
    Alberto Martini
    Ugo G. Falagario
    Zeynep Gul
    Alp T. Beksac
    Isuru Jayaratna
    George K. Haines
    Giuseppe Carrieri
    Ash Tewari
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 813 - 819
  • [48] NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
    Dinneen, Eoin
    Haider, Aiman
    Allen, Clare
    Freeman, Alex
    Briggs, Tim
    Nathan, Senthil
    Brew-Graves, Chris
    Grierson, Jack
    Williams, Norman R.
    Persad, Raj
    Oakley, Neil
    Adshead, Jim M.
    Huland, Hartwig
    Haese, Alexander
    Shaw, Greg
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (06):
  • [49] Sacrifice of Accessory Pudendal Arteries in Normally Potent Men during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Does Not Impact Potency
    Box, Geoffrey N.
    Kaplan, Adam G.
    Rodriguez, Esequiel, Jr.
    Skarecky, Douglas W.
    Osann, Kathryn E.
    Finley, David S.
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (01): : 298 - 303
  • [50] HOW DOES ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY COMPARE TO OPEN SURGERY IN MEN WITH HIGH-RISK TUMORS?
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Cowan, Janet
    Carroll, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E453 - E453