Survival of patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin or concurrent cetuximab: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare analysis

被引:27
|
作者
Xiang, Michael [1 ]
Holsinger, F. Christopher [2 ]
Colevas, A. Dimitrios [3 ]
Chen, Michelle M. [2 ]
Quynh-Thu Le [1 ]
Beadle, Beth M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, 875 Blake Wilbur Dr,Room CC-G226, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Div Head & Neck Surg, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Div Oncol, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
关键词
cetuximab; chemoradiotherapy; cisplatin; head and neck neoplasms; Medicare; propensity score; squamous cell carcinoma; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD; RADIATION-THERAPY; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; CONCOMITANT CHEMOTHERAPY; TRIAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATION; TOXICITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.31708
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Cisplatin and cetuximab are both systemic therapies commonly used in combination with radiation (RT) for the definitive treatment of head and neck cancers, but their comparative efficacy is unclear. Methods Patients with locoregionally advanced (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III-IVB) squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results -Medicare database. Patients received either cisplatin or cetuximab concurrent with RT, as determined by Medicare claims. The primary study outcome was head and neck cancer-specific mortality (CSM) analyzed with competing risks. Filtering, propensity score matching, and multivariable Fine-Gray regression were used to adjust for differences between the cisplatin and cetuximab cohorts, including age, comorbidity, and cycles of systemic therapy received. Results The total cohort consisted of 1395 patients, of whom 786 (56%) received cisplatin and 609 (44%) received cetuximab; the median follow-up was 3.5 years in the patients who remained alive. In the cetuximab cohort, CSM was significantly higher than in the cisplatin cohort (39% vs 25% at 3 years; P < .0001). In the matched cohorts (n = 414), the adjusted hazard ratio of CSM for cetuximab was 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.09; P < .0001) relative to cisplatin, corresponding to an absolute difference of approximately 10% in both CSM and overall survival at 3 years. Cetuximab was associated with less dysphagia, more dermatitis, and a similar incidence of mucositis. Conclusions In this sizeable, national patient population, treatment with cetuximab was associated with significantly higher CSM than cisplatin. These results suggest that cisplatin may be the preferred chemotherapeutic agent in this setting. (C) 2018 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:4486 / 4494
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The relationship of cetuximab-induced rash and survival in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy and cetuximab
    Bonner, JA
    Harari, PM
    Giralt, J
    Cohen, R
    Baselga, J
    Raben, D
    Shin, DM
    Ove, R
    Jassem, J
    Amellal, N
    Azarnia, N
    Ang, KK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S73 - S73
  • [32] Concurrent Definitive Immunoradiotherapy for Patients with Stage III-IV Head and Neck Cancer and Cisplatin Contraindication
    Weiss, Jared
    Sheth, Siddharth
    Deal, Allision M.
    Olson, Juneko E. Grilley
    Patel, Samip
    Hackman, Trevor G.
    Blumberg, Jeffrey M.
    Galloway, Thomas J.
    Patel, Shetal
    Zanation, Adam M.
    Shen, Colette J.
    Hayes, D. Neil
    Hilliard, Christopher
    Mehra, Ranee
    McKinnon, Karen P.
    Wang, Hsing-Hui
    Weissler, Mark Christian
    Bauman, Jessica R.
    Chera, Bhishamjit S.
    Vincent, Benjamin G.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (16) : 4260 - 4267
  • [33] Toxicity and tolerance of concurrent docetaxel with radiotherapy in cisplatin ineligible head and neck cancer patients.
    Simha, Vijai
    Patil, Vijay Maruti
    Joshi, Amit
    Noronha, Vanita
    Talreja, Vikas
    Dhumal, Sachin
    Chandrasekharan, Arun
    Shrirangwar, Sameer
    Prabhash, Kumar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [34] Phase I trial of concurrent tirapazamine, cisplatin, and radiotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer
    Rischin, D
    Peters, L
    Hicks, R
    Hughes, P
    Fisher, R
    Hart, R
    Sexton, M
    D'Costa, I
    von Roemeling, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (02) : 535 - 542
  • [35] Concurrent, cisplatin-based chemotherapy with accelerated radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer patients
    Skladowski, K. A., Sr.
    Rutkowski, T.
    Wygoda, A.
    Golen, M.
    Pilecki, B.
    Przeorek, W.
    Lukaszczyk-Widel, B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [36] Aggressiveness of Intensive Care Use Among Patients With Lung Cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Registry
    Cooke, Colin R.
    Feemster, Laura C.
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    O'Neil, Maya E.
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    CHEST, 2014, 146 (04) : 916 - 923
  • [37] Radiotherapy compliance is maintained with hyprofractionation and concurrent cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck cancer
    Chan, Andrew
    Teoh, Daien
    Singhera, Paul
    Hartley, Andrew
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 93 (03) : 654 - 654
  • [38] Unilateral Cervical Polyneuropathies following Concurrent Bortezomib, Cetuximab, and Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Elghouche, Alhasan
    Shokri, Tom
    Qin, Yewen
    Wargo, Susannah
    Citrin, Deborah
    Van Waes, Carter
    CASE REPORTS IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 2016
  • [39] Objective Assessment of Swallowing Function After Definitive Concurrent (Chemo)radiotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
    Agarwal, Jaiprakash
    Palwe, Vijay
    Dutta, Debnarayan
    Gupta, Tejpal
    Laskar, Sarbani Ghosh
    Budrukkar, Ashwini
    Murthy, Vedang
    Chaturvedi, Pankaj
    Pai, Prathamesh
    Chaukar, Devendra
    D'Cruz, Anil K.
    Kulkarni, Suyash
    Kulkarni, Aniruddha
    Baccher, Gurmit
    Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
    DYSPHAGIA, 2011, 26 (04) : 399 - 406
  • [40] Objective Assessment of Swallowing Function After Definitive Concurrent (Chemo)radiotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
    Jaiprakash Agarwal
    Vijay Palwe
    Debnarayan Dutta
    Tejpal Gupta
    Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
    Ashwini Budrukkar
    Vedang Murthy
    Pankaj Chaturvedi
    Prathamesh Pai
    Devendra Chaukar
    Anil K. D’Cruz
    Suyash Kulkarni
    Aniruddha Kulkarni
    Gurmit Baccher
    Shyam Kishore Shrivastava
    Dysphagia, 2011, 26 : 399 - 406