Similar glucose control with basal bolus regimen of insulin detemir plus insulin aspart and thrice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a 50-week randomized clinical trial of stepwise insulin intensification

被引:15
|
作者
Malek, R. [1 ]
Ajili, F. [2 ]
Assaad-Khalil, S. H. [3 ]
Shinde, A. [4 ]
Chen, J. W. [5 ]
Van den Berg, E. [6 ]
机构
[1] Saadna Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Setif, Algeria
[2] Mil Hosp Tunis, Dept Internal Med, Tunis, Tunisia
[3] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Alexandria, Egypt
[4] FZ LLC, Novo Nordisk Pharma Gulf, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[5] Novo Nordisk Reg Int Operat AS, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Zuid Afrikaanse Hosp, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Insulin intensification; Insulin detemir; Biphasic insulin aspart; Basal-bolus insulin; Premixed insulin; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; GLARGINE; MELLITUS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabet.2014.11.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. This study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of 50-week treatment with stepwise insulin intensification of basal bolus insulin analogues [insulin detemir (IDet) and aspart (IAsp)] versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30) in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients not controlled by oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs). Research design and methods. In this open-label multicentre, multinational, randomized, parallel-arm treat-to-target trial, 403 insulin-naive patients with T2DM in four African countries were randomized to either an IDet + IAsp (n=200) or BIAspl-2-3 (n=203) treatment group. Stepwise insulin intensification was performed at the end of 14, 26 and 38 weeks, depending on HbA(1c) values. The primary endpoint was change in HbA(1c) after 50 weeks of treatment. Safety variables were hypoglycaemia incidence, occurrence of adverse events and weight gain. Results. Non-inferiority of the IDet + IAsp versus BIAspl-2-3 treatment regimen was demonstrated by their similar HbA(1c) levels at the end of trial (IDet + IAsp: baseline 8.6%, 50 weeks 7.4%; BIAspl-2-3: baseline 8.7%, 50 weeks 7.3%; full analysis set difference: 0.1% [95% CI: 0.1, 0.3]; per protocol: 0.2% [95% CI: 0.1, 0.4]). At week 50, 40.3 and 44.9% of patients achieved HbA(1c) <7.0% with IDet + IAsp and BIAspl-2-3, respectively. The rate of overall hypoglycaemia during the trial was also similar in both groups (IDet + IAsp: 9.4 events/patient-year; BIAspl-2-3: 9.8 events/patient-year). Conclusion. Insulin initiation and intensification using IDet + IAsp was not inferior to BIAspl-2-3 in insulin-naive patients with T2DM not controlled by OGLDs. Both regimens led to similar reductions in HbA(1c) values after 50 weeks of treatment. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 230
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) twice daily (BID) vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) BID: a randomised trial in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes
    Ma, J.
    Yang, W.
    Hong, T.
    Liu, M.
    Miao, H.
    Peng, Y.
    Wang, C.
    Xu, X.
    Yang, T.
    Liu, W.
    Nielsen, A. Moeller
    Pan, L.
    Weigang, Z.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 : S410 - S411
  • [22] Intensifying insulin regimen after basal insulin optimization in adults with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, open-label trial comparing insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine with biphasic insulin aspart (LanScape)
    Vora, J.
    Cohen, N.
    Evans, M.
    Hockey, A.
    Speight, J.
    Whately-Smith, C.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2015, 17 (12): : 1133 - 1141
  • [23] Treat-to-target comparison between once daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine in Chinese and Japanese insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes
    Yang, Wenying
    Xu, Xiangjin
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Yang, Gangyi
    Seino, Yutaka
    Andersen, Henning
    Jinnouchi, Hideaki
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2013, 29 (12) : 1599 - 1608
  • [24] Insulin detemir and insulin aspart:: A promising basal-bolus regimen for type 2 diabetes (vol 66, pg 193, 2004)
    Raslová, K
    Bogoev, M
    Raz, I
    Leth, G
    Gall, MA
    Hâncu, N
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 72 (01) : 112 - 112
  • [25] Use of a New Basal Insulin with a Bolus Boost (IDegAsp) in Type 2 Diabetes: Comparison with Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (BIAsp 30)
    Vaag, Allan
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Franek, Edward
    Weng, Jianping
    Damci, Taner
    Munoz Torres, Manuel
    Donnet, Jean-Paul
    Endahl, Lars
    Skjoth, Trine V.
    Niskanen, Leo
    DIABETES, 2011, 60 : A313 - A313
  • [26] Comparison of biphasic premixed insulin versus once daily basal insulin in insulin-naive veteran patients with type 2 diabetes
    Grisham-Takac, Catlin
    Yeary, Julianne
    Edwards, Krystal
    Chastain, Lisa
    Kelly, Kevin C.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 35 (11): : E259 - E259
  • [27] Comparison of thrice daily biphasic human insulin (30/70) versus basal detemir & bolus aspart in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus - A pilot study
    Shanmugasundar, G.
    Bhansali, Anil
    Walia, Rama
    Dutta, Pinaki
    Upreti, Vimal
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 135 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of twice daily vs. thrice daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin naive patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with OADs
    Yang, Wenying
    Ji, Qiuhe
    Zhu, Dalong
    Yang, Jinkui
    Chen, Lulu
    Liu, Zhimin
    Yu, Demin
    Yan, Li
    DIABETES, 2007, 56 : A546 - A546
  • [29] Treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 versus insulin glargine in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients: long-term effects on diabetesrelated complications
    Lammert, M
    Palmer, AJ
    Roze, S
    Valentine, WJ
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 : A308 - A309
  • [30] Efficacy of switching from basal-bolus insulin therapy to twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart co-formulation plus insulin aspart in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes
    Gunes, E.
    Gunes, M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (14) : 6691 - 6699