Communicating Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Light of New Guidelines: Clinical Practices at Federally Qualified Health Centers

被引:5
|
作者
Head, Katharine J. [1 ]
Johnson, Nicole L. [1 ]
Scott, Susanna Foxworthy [1 ,2 ]
Zimet, Gregory D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ Indianapolis, Dept Commun Studies, 307C Cavanagh Hall, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Div Clin Pharmacol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Div Adolescent Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FOLLOW-UP; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; WOMEN; LITERACY; PATIENT; KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS; BELIEFS; CARE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1080/10410236.2019.1593079
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
New guidelines for cervical cancer screening (CCS) incorporate both HPV and Pap tests, and there is a need to understand communication of these cotesting results to patients, especially in at-risk populations disproportionally affected by cervical cancer. This study used computer-assisted telephone interviews in 2017 at 51 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Indiana to evaluate the characteristics of clinical communication CCS results to women. Results revealed that clinical communication practices varied on channel, timing, and content. Almost half of the clinics (n = 23, 45%) communicate results to patients by phone. Most clinics (n = 47, 92%) notify patients of results in two weeks or less. For cotesting, 70% (n = 36) always communicate Pap/HPV results at the same time. The majority of clinics (n = 42, 82%) explain the type of abnormal Pap test, while only 43% (n = 22) discuss the cervical cancer risk as indicated by the HPV test result. Even though 98% (n = 48) of participants rated their communication strategy as effective, qualitatively participants acknowledged difficulties in communicating cotesting results with their often transient and low health literate patients populations. These results indicate considerable variation and potential deficits in clinical communication of cotesting results in FQHCs, but several promising communication strategies were identified that may inform improved screening communication for other clinics.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 821
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patients’ Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Preparatory Education in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Clement K. Gwede
    Alexis M. Koskan
    Gwendolyn P. Quinn
    Stacy N. Davis
    Jamila Ealey
    Rania Abdulla
    Susan T. Vadaparampil
    Gloria Elliott
    Diana Lopez
    David Shibata
    Richard G. Roetzheim
    Cathy D. Meade
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2015, 30 : 294 - 300
  • [22] Patients' Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Preparatory Education in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Gwede, Clement K.
    Koskan, Alexis M.
    Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
    Davis, Stacy N.
    Ealey, Jamila
    Abdulla, Rania
    Vadaparampil, Susan T.
    Elliott, Gloria
    Lopez, Diana
    Shibata, David
    Roetzheim, Richard G.
    Meade, Cathy D.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2015, 30 (02) : 294 - 300
  • [23] Predictors of cancer screening in federally qualified health centers in the United States: A cross sectional study
    Stuckwisch, Ashley M.
    Narayan, Anand K.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (12)
  • [24] PREDICTORS OF COLON CANCER SCREENING AMONG INDIVIDUALS IN A NETWORK OF URBAN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS
    Greywoode, Ruby
    Jandorf, Lina
    Calman, Neil
    Itzkowitz, Steven
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S575 - S575
  • [25] Addressing Tobacco Cessation at Federally Qualified Health Centers: Current Practices & Resources
    Flocke, Susan A.
    Vanderpool, Robin
    Birkby, Genevieve
    Gullett, Heidi
    Seaman, Elizabeth L.
    Land, Stephanie
    Zeliadt, Steve
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2019, 30 (03) : 1024 - 1036
  • [26] Health Information Technology Adoption and Clinical Performance in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Davlyatov, Ganisher
    Borkowski, Nancy
    Feldman, Sue
    Qu, Haiyan
    Burke, Darrell
    Bronstein, Janet
    Brickman, Andrew
    JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2020, 42 (05) : 287 - 293
  • [27] USE OF HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS PREDICTS HIGH COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING RATES
    Singh, Vidhi
    Zhao, Matthew Y.
    Aaronson, Megan R.
    Badiee, Jayraan
    May, Folasade P.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S909 - S910
  • [28] Implementing a Substance Use Screening Protocol in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Reddick, Blake
    Foli, Karen J.
    Coddington, Jennifer A.
    Hountz, Diane
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES ASSOCIATION, 2023, 29 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [29] HEPATITIS C VIRUS SCREENING IN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS IN RURAL APPALACHIA
    Olanrewaju, F. S.
    McKenzie, S. W.
    Vanhook, P.
    Falodun, A.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 67 (02) : 427 - 427
  • [30] Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Thuy Le
    Keast, Erin
    Rivelli, Jennifer
    Bigler, Keshia
    Green, Beverly
    Vollmer, William M.
    Coronado, Gloria
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2018, 43 (01) : 128 - 136