Communicating Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Light of New Guidelines: Clinical Practices at Federally Qualified Health Centers

被引:5
|
作者
Head, Katharine J. [1 ]
Johnson, Nicole L. [1 ]
Scott, Susanna Foxworthy [1 ,2 ]
Zimet, Gregory D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ Indianapolis, Dept Commun Studies, 307C Cavanagh Hall, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Div Clin Pharmacol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Div Adolescent Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FOLLOW-UP; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; WOMEN; LITERACY; PATIENT; KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS; BELIEFS; CARE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1080/10410236.2019.1593079
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
New guidelines for cervical cancer screening (CCS) incorporate both HPV and Pap tests, and there is a need to understand communication of these cotesting results to patients, especially in at-risk populations disproportionally affected by cervical cancer. This study used computer-assisted telephone interviews in 2017 at 51 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Indiana to evaluate the characteristics of clinical communication CCS results to women. Results revealed that clinical communication practices varied on channel, timing, and content. Almost half of the clinics (n = 23, 45%) communicate results to patients by phone. Most clinics (n = 47, 92%) notify patients of results in two weeks or less. For cotesting, 70% (n = 36) always communicate Pap/HPV results at the same time. The majority of clinics (n = 42, 82%) explain the type of abnormal Pap test, while only 43% (n = 22) discuss the cervical cancer risk as indicated by the HPV test result. Even though 98% (n = 48) of participants rated their communication strategy as effective, qualitatively participants acknowledged difficulties in communicating cotesting results with their often transient and low health literate patients populations. These results indicate considerable variation and potential deficits in clinical communication of cotesting results in FQHCs, but several promising communication strategies were identified that may inform improved screening communication for other clinics.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 821
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cancer Screening Through Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Spencer, Jennifer C.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (06) : 679 - 680
  • [2] National Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Use in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Amboree, Trisha L.
    Montealegre, Jane R.
    Parker, Susan L.
    Garg, Ashvita
    Damgacioglu, Haluk
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Chiao, Elizabeth Y.
    Hill, Elizabeth G.
    Sonawane, Kalyani
    Deshmukh, Ashish A.
    Adsul, Prajakta
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (06) : 671 - 679
  • [3] Cervical cancer screening behaviors and proximity to federally qualified health centers in South Carolina
    Adams, Swann Arp
    Haynes, Venice E.
    Brandt, Heather M.
    Choi, Seul Ki
    Young, Vicki
    Eberth, Jan M.
    Hebert, James R.
    Friedman, Daniela B.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 65
  • [4] Primary care provider practices and beliefs related to cervical cancer screening with the HPV test in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Roland, K. B.
    Benard, V. B.
    Greek, A.
    Hawkins, N. A.
    Manninen, D.
    Saraiya, M.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (05) : 419 - 425
  • [5] Partnering with federally qualified health centers to increase cervical cancer screening guideline knowledge and confidence
    Shin, Michelle
    Oh, Allison
    Dang, Emily
    Garcia, Samantha
    He, Zehui
    Ramos, Alejandra
    Tsui, Jennifer
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 22
  • [6] Knowledge of oral cancer and screening practices of primary care providers at Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Sohn, W
    Ismail, AI
    Kolker, JL
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2005, 65 (03) : 160 - 165
  • [7] Challenges Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Zeliadt, Steven B.
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Birkby, Genevieve
    Eberth, Jan M.
    Brenner, Alison T.
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Flocke, Susan A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (04) : 568 - 575
  • [8] System Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Daly, Jeanette M.
    Levy, Barcey T.
    Moss, Carol A.
    Bay, Camden P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 105 (01) : 212 - 219
  • [9] Patient knowledge and beliefs as barriers to extending cervical cancer screening intervals in Federally Qualified Health Centers
    Hawkins, Nikki A.
    Benard, Vicki B.
    Greek, April
    Roland, Katherine B.
    Manninen, Diane
    Saraiya, Mona
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (05) : 641 - 645
  • [10] Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    O'Leary, Meghan C.
    Crockett, Seth D.
    Farr, Deeonna E.
    Ferrari, Renee M.
    Malo, Teri L.
    Moore, Alexis A.
    Randolph, Connor M.
    Ratner, Shana
    Stradtman, Lindsay R.
    Stylianou, Christina
    Su, Kevin
    Tan, Xianming
    Tang, Van
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    Brenner, Alison T.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (11)