Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components

被引:15
|
作者
Perlbach, R. [1 ,2 ]
Palm, L. [1 ,2 ]
Mohaddes, M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Ivarsson, I. [1 ,2 ]
Schilcher, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Orthoped Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Orthoped, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Registerctr VGR, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2020年 / 102B卷 / 02期
关键词
HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; ALLOGRAFT; RECONSTRUCTION; MIGRATION; FAILURE; PROSTHESES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0584.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This single-centre observational study aimed to describe the results of extensive bone impaction grafting of the whole acetabular cavity in combination with an uncemented component in acetabular revisions performed in a standardized manner since 1993. Methods Between 1993 and 2013, 370 patients with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 79 years) underwent acetabular revision surgery. Of these, 229 were more than ten years following surgery and 137 were more than 15 years. All revisions were performed with extensive use of morcellized allograft firmly impacted into the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented component with supplementary screw fixation. All types of reoperation were captured using review of radiographs and medical charts, combined with data from the local surgical register and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Results Among patients with possible follow-up of ten and 15 years, 152 and 72 patients remained alive without revision of the acetabular component. The number of deaths was 61 and 50, respectively. Of those who died, six patients in each group had a reoperation performed before death. The number of patients with a reoperation was 22 for those with ten-year follow-up and 21 for those with 15 years of follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for aseptic loosening among all 370 patients in the cohort was 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 98.5) after ten years and 92.8% (95% CI 89.2 to 96.6) after 15 years. Conclusion Extensive bone impaction grafting combined with uncemented revision components appears to be a reliable method with favourable long-term survival. This technique offers the advantage of bone stock restoration and disputes the long-standing perception that uncemented components require > 50% of host bone contact for successful implant survival.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 204
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selection of allografts for impaction bone grafting for bone defect reconstruction on the acetabular side
    Xu Zheng-jian
    He Rong-xin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (21) : 3143 - 3147
  • [42] Selection of allografts for impaction bone grafting for bone defect reconstruction on the acetabular side
    XU Zhengjian and HE Rongxin Department of Orthopaedic SurgerySecond Affiliated Hospital School of MedicineZhejiang UniversityHangzhouZhejiang China
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2010, (21) : 3143 - 3147
  • [43] Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components
    Ghosh, Rajesh
    Mukherjee, Kaushik
    Gupta, Sanjay
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2013, 227 (H5) : 490 - 502
  • [44] Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3-18 years
    Schreurs, BW
    Zengerink, M
    Welten, MLM
    van Kampen, A
    Slooff, TJJH
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (437) : 145 - 151
  • [45] A cemented cup with acetabular impaction bone grafting is more cost-effective than an uncemented cup in patients under 50 years
    Busch, Vincent J. J. F.
    Verschueren, Joost
    Adang, Eddy M.
    Lie, Stein A.
    Havelin, Leif I.
    Schreurs, Berend W.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 26 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [46] Analysis of the retrieved hip after revision with impaction grafting
    Weidenhielm, LRA
    Mikhail, WEM
    Wretenberg, P
    Fow, J
    Simpson, J
    Bauer, TW
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 72 (06): : 609 - 614
  • [47] Impaction bone grafting for contained acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty
    Abu-Zeid, Mohamed Yousry
    Habib, Mohamed El-Sawy
    Marei, Sameh Mohamed
    Elbarbary, Ahmed Nasr-Eldin
    Ebied, Ahmed Ali
    Mesregah, Mohamed Kamal
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [48] Impaction bone grafting for contained acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty
    Mohamed Yousry Abu-Zeid
    Mohamed El-Sawy Habib
    Sameh Mohamed Marei
    Ahmed Nasr-Eldin Elbarbary
    Ahmed Ali Ebied
    Mohamed Kamal Mesregah
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [49] Distal femoral impaction bone grafting in revision for tumor endoprosthesis
    Kito, Munehisa
    Okamoto, Masanori
    Aoki, Kaoru
    Tanaka, Atsushi
    Komatsu, Yukiko
    Suzuki, Shuichiro
    Takazawa, Akira
    Yoshimura, Yasuo
    Takahashi, Jun
    KNEE, 2021, 29 : 42 - 48
  • [50] Femoral impaction grafting in revision hip arthroplasty with irradiated bone
    Robinson, DE
    Lee, MB
    Smith, EJ
    Learmonth, ID
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (07): : 834 - 840