Monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate using water as the irrigation fluid: Our initial experience

被引:1
|
作者
Jeje, Emmanuel A. [1 ]
Alabi, Taiwo O. [4 ]
Ojewola, Rufus W. [1 ]
Ogunjimi, Moses A. [1 ]
Tijani, Kehinde H. [1 ]
Asiyanbi, Gabriel K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lagos, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Lagos, Nigeria
[2] Univ Lagos, Coll Med, Dept Anaesthesia, Lagos, Nigeria
[3] Lagos Univ Teaching Hosp, Lagos, Nigeria
[4] Fed Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Unit, Lagos, Nigeria
关键词
Prostatic enlargement; TURP; water; URETHRAL STRICTURE; MORBIDITY; TURP;
D O I
10.4103/npmj.npmj_502_21
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) has been the gold standard of surgical intervention in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with the indication for surgery. This can be achieved using varieties of irrigation fluids. Objectives: To document our experience with M-TURP using water as irrigation fluid in 123 consecutive patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of all patients who had M-TURP with water as irrigation fluid was performed between January 2017 and July 2019. Information retrieved from theatre records and case notes includes patient's socio-demographic data, indications for surgery, intra-operative findings, the volume of resected chips and irrigation fluid used, post-operative complications and patient's satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure. These data were analysed using SPSS version 23. Results: Data from 123 patients were analysed and presented. The age range was 44-96 years with a mean of 69 years. Prostate volume ranges from 13.9 to 276.00 mls with a mean of 95.69 mls while resected prostate volume ranges from 2.0 to 158.0 mls with a mean of 56.68 mls. Volume of the sterile water used as irrigation fluid ranged from 5.0 L to 174.0 L with a mean of 68.7 L. Mean reduction in International Prostate Symptoms Score, improvement in Q-max and reduction in post-void residual urine were 22.1, 16.9 and 141.6 mls, respectively. Transfusion rate was 6.5% while the duration of admission ranges from 1 to 6 days, with a mean of 2.5 days. The overall complication rate was 26.0%. Ninety-six percent were satisfied with the outcome. Conclusion: M-TURP using water as irrigation fluid is safe and is as good as using the more rather expensive glycine or normal saline in bipolar TURP.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 180
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The use of ethanol as a marker to detect and quantify the absorption of irrigation fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate
    Hjertberg, H
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1996, : 4 - 64
  • [42] Experience of transurethral resection of the prostate: a qualitative study
    Valiee, Sina
    Kalhor, Marya Maryam
    Nayeri, Nahid Dehghan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING, 2013, 7 (02) : 68 - 75
  • [43] MONOPOLAR VERSUS BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE: EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT ON SEXUAL FUNCTION
    Egui Rojo, M. A.
    Redon Galvez, L.
    Alvarez Ardura, M.
    Otaola Arca, H.
    Paez Borda, A.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (04): : E150 - E150
  • [44] A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED STUDY COMPARING BIPOLAR VERSUS MONOPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE
    Neyer, Michael
    Engeler, Daniel
    Schwab, Christoph
    Pointner, Josef
    Grun, Timo
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    Reissigl, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E738 - E739
  • [45] Comparison of monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: Evaluation of the impact on sexual
    Egui Rojo, Maria Alejandra
    Redon Galvez, Laura
    Alvarez Ardura, Manuel
    Otaola Arca, Hugo
    Paez Borda, Alvaro
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE ANDROLOGIA, 2020, 18 (02): : 43 - 49
  • [46] Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral prostate resection: Comparison of hemodynamic and biochemical changes
    Hafez, Mohamed Hafez El Saied
    Abd El Hamid, Mona Hossam El Din
    Abd El Raouf, Sabah
    Soaida, Sherif Mohamed
    Marie, Mohamed Mahmoud
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 30 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [47] Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Bipolar and Monopolar Transurethral Prostate Resection in Geriatric Patients
    Kervancioglu, E.
    Hasirci, E.
    Salgur, F.
    Cicek, Z.
    Doruk, H.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 27 (08) : 1020 - 1026
  • [48] Monopolar and bipolar transurethral prostate resection in surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Hasirci, Eray
    Dirim, Ayhan
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2012, 11 (04): : 265 - 269
  • [49] Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Comparative Study
    Hirik, Erkan
    Bozkurt, Aliseydi
    Karabakan, Mehmet
    Aydemir, Huseyin
    Aktas, Binhan Kagan
    Nuhoglu, Baris
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 12 (06) : 2452 - 2456
  • [50] CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT FLOW IRRIGATION IN TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE
    EKENGREN, J
    HAHN, RG
    UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (03) : 328 - 332