In vitro fertilization following natural cycles in poor responders

被引:29
|
作者
Feldman, B [1 ]
Seidman, DS [1 ]
Levron, J [1 ]
Bider, D [1 ]
Shulman, A [1 ]
Shine, S [1 ]
Dor, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Vitro Fertilizat Unit, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
关键词
natural cycle; poor response; IVF;
D O I
10.1080/713602923
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This prospective study was designed to examine the feasibility of natural cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) in poor responders, and the clinical factors that may predict successful outcome. Twenty-two poor responders underwent IVF treatment with 44 unstimulated cycles, The results of the natural cycles were compared with those of the 55 low-response stimulated cycles of these patients during the 12 months prior to the study. Eighteen (82%) patients had at least one oocyte retrieved, while nine (41%) had at least one cycle with embryo transfer. Two (9%) patients each gave birth to a healthy term baby. These results are comparable with those of the stimulated cycles. Serum early follicular follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level was found to be the only reliable predictor of oocyte recovery and overall outcome in each specific natural cycle. However, because of great variability in basal FSH levels among different cycles of the same patient, this is not a reliable predictor Of outcome in future cycles. We conclude that poor responders are a unique group of patients who may benefit from natural-cycle IVF treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 334
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gonadotropin stimulation following GnRH-a priming for poor responders in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programs
    Pinkas, H
    Orvieto, R
    Avrech, OM
    Rufas, O
    Ferber, A
    Ben-Rafael, Z
    Fisch, B
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [32] Comparison of natural in-vitro fertilization cycles with and without the use of GnRH antagonists for poor responder patients
    Aksoy, S.
    Yakin, K.
    Caliskan, S.
    Salar, Z.
    Ata, B.
    Urman, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [33] In vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in natural cycles
    Busso, Newton Eduardo
    Busso, Cristiano Eduardo
    Tso, Leopoldo de Oliveira
    Flores Auge, Antonio Pedro
    Busso, Rene Eduardo
    Boaro, Luciana
    Almeida Prado, Roberto Adelino
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2007, 29 (07): : 340 - 345
  • [34] In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer during natural cycles
    Ng, EHY
    Chui, DKC
    Tang, OS
    Lau, EYL
    Yeung, WSB
    Chung, HP
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (02) : 95 - 99
  • [35] Comment on "The Role of Overweight and Obesity in In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes of Poor Ovarian Responders"
    Orvieto, Raoul
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [36] IN VITRO FERTILIZATION POOR RESPONDERS: IS INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION BETTER THAN OOCYTE RETRIEVAL?
    Gurich, D. T.
    Forstein, D.
    Gill, S.
    Miller, P.
    Likes, C.
    Higdon, L., III
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (03) : E67 - E67
  • [37] Embryo quality in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in young poor responders
    Almog, Benny
    Eldar, Ido
    Barkan, Gali
    Amit, Ami
    Wagman, Israel
    Levin, Ishai
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (09) : 657 - 659
  • [38] When is the right time to stop autologous in vitro fertilization treatment in poor responders?
    Cakmak, Hakan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 117 (04) : 682 - 687
  • [39] Effect of cotreatment with growth hormone on ovarian stimulation in poor responders to in vitro fertilization
    Sugaya, S
    Suzuki, M
    Fujita, K
    Kurabayashi, T
    Tanaka, K
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (05) : 1251 - 1253
  • [40] NATURAL VERSUS CLOMIPHENE CITRATE CYCLES FOR IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION
    BABBO, CJ
    HECHT, BR
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1994, 62 (06) : 1288 - 1289