Hypothetical reasoning about actions: From situation calculus to event calculus

被引:9
|
作者
Provetti, A [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS, DEPT COMP SCI, EL PASO, TX 79968 USA
关键词
actions and change; hypothetical reasoning; narrative assimilation; knowledge representation; logic programming;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1996.tb00272.x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Hypothetical reasoning about actions is the activity of preevaluating the effect of performing actions in a changing domain; this reasoning underlies applications of knowledge representation, such as planning and explanation generation. Action effects are often specified in the language of situation calculus, introduced by McCarthy and Hayes in 1969. More recently, the event calculus has been defined to describe actual actions, i.e., those that have occurred in the past, and their effects on the domain. Altough the two formalisms share the basic ontology of atomic actions and fluents, situation calculus cannot represent actual actions while event calculus cannot represent hypotethical actions. In this article, the language and the axioms of event calculus are extended to allow representing and reasoning about hypothetical actions, performed either at the present time or in the past, altough counterfactuals are not supported. Both event calculus and its extension are defined as logic programs so that theories are readily adaptable for Prolog query interpretation. For a reasonably large class of theories and queries, Prolog interpretation is shown to be sound and complete w.r.t. the main semantics for logic programs.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 498
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reasoning about commitments in the event calculus: An approach for specifying and executing protocols
    Yolum, P
    Singh, MP
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, 42 (1-3) : 227 - 253
  • [22] Reasoning about Commitments in the Event Calculus: An Approach for Specifying and Executing Protocols
    Pınar Yolum
    Munindar P. Singh
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2004, 42 : 227 - 253
  • [23] Epistemic Reasoning for Machine Ethics with Situation Calculus
    Pagnucco, Maurice
    Rajaratnam, David
    Limarga, Raynaldio
    Nayak, Abhaya
    Song, Yang
    AIES '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, 2021, : 814 - 821
  • [24] Decidable Reasoning in a Fragment of the Epistemic Situation Calculus
    Lakemeyer, Gerhard
    Levesque, Hector J.
    FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING, 2014, : 468 - 477
  • [25] Reasoning about pointers in refinement calculus
    Back, RJ
    Fan, XC
    Preoteasa, V
    ASIA-PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 425 - 434
  • [26] A calculus for reasoning about software composition
    Achermann, F
    Nierstrasz, O
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2005, 331 (2-3) : 367 - 396
  • [27] Asynchronous knowledge with hidden actions in the situation calculus
    Kelly, Ryan F.
    Pearce, Adrian R.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 221 : 1 - 35
  • [28] Automating Commonsense Reasoning Using the Event Calculus
    Mueller, Erik T.
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2009, 52 (01) : 113 - 117
  • [29] Efficient temporal reasoning in the cached event calculus
    Chittaro, L
    Montanari, A
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 12 (03) : 359 - 382