A Social Interpolation Model of Group Problem-Solving

被引:3
|
作者
Sloman, Sabina J. [1 ]
Goldstone, Robert L. [2 ]
Gonzalez, Cleotilde [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Program Cognit Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Computational modeling; Exploration-exploitation trade-off; Group dynamics; Social networks; Social learning; WIN-STAY; CURIOSITY; EXPLORATION; ATTENTION; PROTOTYPE; EXEMPLAR;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.13066
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How do people use information from others to solve complex problems? Prior work has addressed this question by placing people in social learning situations where the problems they were asked to solve required varying degrees of exploration. This past work uncovered important interactions between groups' connectivity and the problem's complexity: the advantage of less connected networks over more connected networks increased as exploration was increasingly required for optimally solving the problem at hand. We propose the Social Interpolation Model (SIM), an agent-based model to explore the cognitive mechanisms that can underlie exploratory behavior in groups. Through results from simulation experiments, we conclude that "exploration" may not be a single cognitive property, but rather the emergent result of three distinct behavioral and cognitive mechanisms, namely, (a) breadth of generalization, (b) quality of prior expectation, and (c) relative valuation of self-obtained information. We formalize these mechanisms in the SIM, and explore their effects on group dynamics and success at solving different kinds of problems. Our main finding is that broad generalization and high quality of prior expectation facilitate successful search in environments where exploration is important, and hinder successful search in environments where exploitation alone is sufficient.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GROUP DECISION-MAKING AND PROBLEM-SOLVING
    PERLAKI, I
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 1985, 33 (06): : 556 - 566
  • [42] Innovation, Imitation, and Problem-Solving in a Networked Group
    Wisdom, Thomas N.
    Goldstone, Robert L.
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS PSYCHOLOGY AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (02) : 229 - 252
  • [43] Learning problem-solving thinking in group work
    Nozinovic, S
    Nachtsheim, B
    Scheuermann, S
    Schnorr, J
    Silvers, R
    Wagner, M
    Schwalbe, H
    NACHRICHTEN AUS DER CHEMIE, 2005, 53 (09) : 978 - 980
  • [44] A model of the relationship of sex-role orientation to social problem-solving
    Wang, Xiaolei
    SEX ROLES, 2007, 57 (5-6) : 397 - 408
  • [45] A process model of social intelligence and problem-solving style for conflict management
    Rahim, Afzalur
    Civelek, Ismail
    Liang, Feng Helen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (04) : 487 - 499
  • [46] A Model of the Relationship of Sex-Role Orientation to Social Problem-Solving
    Xiaolei Wang
    Sex Roles, 2007, 57 : 397 - 408
  • [47] THE HEPPNER AND KRAUSKOPF APPROACH - A MODEL OF PERSONAL PROBLEM-SOLVING OR SOCIAL SKILLS
    DZURILLA, TJ
    NEZU, AM
    COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 1987, 15 (03): : 463 - 470
  • [48] Group-to-individual problem-solving transfer
    Laughlin, Patrick R.
    Carey, Harold R.
    Kerr, Norbert L.
    GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2008, 11 (03) : 319 - 330
  • [49] PROBLEM-SOLVING IN GROUP USING MOBILE NOTES
    de-Miguel-Molina, Maria
    de-Miguel-Molina, Blanca
    Santamarina-Campos, Virginia
    Carabal-Montagud, Maria-Angeles
    INTED2017: 11TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2017, : 3825 - 3830
  • [50] EFFECTS OF GROUP EXPERIENCE ON INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM-SOLVING
    HUDGINS, BB
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 51 (01) : 37 - 42