Midazolam vs. diphenhydramine for the treatment of metoclopramide-induced akathisia: A randomized controlled trial

被引:17
|
作者
Parlak, Ismet
Erdur, Bulent [1 ]
Parlak, Mine
Ergin, Ahmet
Ayrik, Cuneyt
Tomruk, Onder
Turkcuer, Ibrahim
Ergin, Nesrin
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Denizli, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Izmir, Turkey
[4] Pamukkale Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Denizli, Turkey
[5] Mersin Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Mersin, Turkey
[6] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Isparta, Italy
[7] Servergazi State Hosp, Neurol Clin, Denizli, Turkey
关键词
akathisia; metoclopramide; midazolam; diphenhydramine; benzodiazepines; anticholinergics;
D O I
10.1197/j.aem.2007.01.021
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the effects of midazolam, which is a fast and short-acting benzodiazepine, and diphenhydramine, which is a widely used anticholinergic agent, in clinical practice for the treatment of metoclopramide-induced akathisia. Methods: All adults older than 17 years given metoclopramide for nausea and vomiting or for headache and who had akathisia were eligible for this clinical, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive diphenhydramine or midazolam. Subjective, objective, and total akathisia scores and modified Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were recorded. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the efficacy and side effects of the medications. Results: Forty-one (73.3%) of the 56 enrolled patients were women. The mean (+/- SD) age was 39.9 (+/- 15.7) years in the diphenhydramine group and 40.9 (+/- 16.2) years in the midazolam group. Mean subjective, objective, and total akathisia scores in the first 5 minutes declined considerably in the midazolam group compared with the diphenhydramine group (p < 0.001). However, the mean Ramsay Sedation Scale score in the first 15 minutes increased significantly in the midazolam group compared with the diphenhydramine group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Midazolam can correct the symptoms of metoclopramide-induced akathisia faster than diphenhydramine, but it causes more sedation. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2007; 14:715-721 (c) 2007 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 721
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] STANDARD VS. ENDOCUFF VS. CAP ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY FOR POLYP DETECTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Floer, Martin
    Laura, Tschaikowski
    Krueger, Hartmut
    Schepke, Michael
    Kempinski, Radoslaw
    Katarzyna, Neubauer
    Poniewierka, Elzbieta
    Kunsch, Steffen
    Ameis, Detlev
    Heinzow, Hauke
    Schmidt, Hartmut H.
    Ellenrieder, Volker
    Meister, Tobias
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB74 - AB74
  • [42] Single bolus of midazolam vs. midazolam plus meperidine for colonoscopy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial
    Radaelli, F
    Meucci, G
    Terruzzi, V
    Spinzi, G
    Imperiali, G
    Strocchi, E
    Lenoci, N
    Mandelli, G
    Toldi, A
    Terreni, N
    Minoli, G
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (05) : AB81 - AB81
  • [43] Midazolam with meperidine and dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam with meperidine for sedation during ERCP: prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial
    Lee, Ban Seok
    Ryu, Junghee
    Lee, Sang Hyub
    Lee, Min Geun
    Jang, Sang Eon
    Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
    Ryu, Ji Kon
    Do, Sang-Hwan
    Kim, Yong-Tae
    ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (04) : 291 - 297
  • [44] Oral clonidine vs midazolam in the prevention of sevoflurane-induced agitation in children.: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Tazeroualti, N.
    De Groote, F.
    De Hert, S.
    De Ville, A.
    Dierick, A.
    Van der Linden, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 98 (05) : 667 - 671
  • [45] A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF NADOLOL IN THE TREATMENT OF NEUROLEPTIC-INDUCED AKATHISIA
    WELLS, BG
    COLD, JA
    MARKEN, PA
    BROWN, CS
    CHU, CC
    JOHNSON, RP
    NASDAHL, CS
    AYUBI, MA
    KNOTT, DH
    ARHEART, KL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 52 (06) : 255 - 260
  • [46] Methadone vs. morphine SR for treatment of neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled trial and the challenges in recruitment
    Lynch, Mary
    Moulin, Dwight
    Perez, Jordy
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LA DOULEUR, 2019, 3 (01): : 180 - 189
  • [47] Double-blind randomized controlled trial of baclofen vs. clonidine in the treatment of opiates withdrawal
    Akhondzadeh, S
    Ahmadi-Abhari, SA
    Assadi, SM
    Shabestari, OL
    Kashani, AR
    Farzanehgan, ZM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 25 (05) : 347 - 353
  • [48] A randomized, controlled trial of duloxetine alone vs. duloxetine plus a telephone intervention in the treatment of depression
    Perahia, David G. S.
    Quail, Deborah
    Gandhi, Paul
    Walker, Daniel J.
    Peveler, Robert C.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2008, 108 (1-2) : 33 - 41
  • [49] Glyceryl trinitrate vs. sphincterotomy for treatment of chronic fissure-in-ano - A randomized, controlled trial
    Oettle, GJ
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (11) : 1318 - 1320
  • [50] Type II error in a randomized controlled trial of appendectomy vs. antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis
    Soreide, Kjetil
    Korner, Hartwig
    Soreide, Jon Arne
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (04) : 871 - 872