A method for epistemic uncertainty quantification and application to uniaxial tension modeling of polymers

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Cho, Chongdu [1 ]
机构
[1] Inha Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Inchon 402751, South Korea
关键词
Epistemic uncertainty quantification; Orthogonal experimental design; Range analysis; Interval analysis; Polymer; Nafion membrane; Uniaxial tension modeling; FUEL-CELL; MEMBRANES;
D O I
10.1007/s12206-015-0233-8
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Epistemic uncertainty, whether due to lack of knowledge or data, is often prevalent in practical engineering structures. We present an effective uncertainty quantification method based on orthogonal experimental design, range analysis and interval analysis for analyzing and propagating this type of uncertainty. Orthogonal experimental design and range analysis are first used to investigate the effect of epistemic uncertain factors on different metrics (such as minimum computational cost, maximum computational accuracy and a mixture of two). Interval analysis is then employed to propagate the dominant epistemic uncertainty from input to output through a model. The present method is applied to construct a uniaxial tension model of polymer Nafion membrane with four selected epistemic uncertain factors (mesh method, element type, boundary condition and constitutive model). A good understanding of the influence of these factors on the outputs of the constructed model demonstrates the effectiveness of the present method.
引用
收藏
页码:1199 / 1206
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ALEATORY AND EPISTEMIC MODELING OF UNCERTAINTY FOR QUANTITATIVE SIMULATIONS
    Schjaer-Jacobsen, Hans
    DECISION MAKING SYSTEMS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 8 : 373 - 383
  • [22] Epistemic Uncertainty Modeling: The-state-of-the-art
    Nguyen, Hung T.
    INTEGRATED UNCERTAINTY IN KNOWLEDGE MODELLING AND DECISION MAKING, IUKM 2015, 2015, 9376 : 1 - 10
  • [23] Physics-informed learning under epistemic uncertainty with an application to system health modeling
    Sanchez, Luciano
    Costa, Nahuel
    Otero, Jose
    Couso, Ines
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2023, 161
  • [24] Uncertainty Quantification in Materials Modeling
    Dienstfrey, Andrew
    Phelan, Frederick R., Jr.
    Christensen, Stephen
    Strachan, Alejandro
    Santosa, Fadil
    Boisvert, Ronald
    JOM, 2014, 66 (07) : 1342 - 1344
  • [25] Application of uncertainty quantification methods for coal devolatilization kinetics in gasifier modeling
    Gel, Aytekin
    Chaudhari, Kiran
    Turton, Richard
    Nicoletti, Philip
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 265 : 66 - 75
  • [26] Uncertainty Quantification in Chemical Modeling
    Mirzayeva, A.
    Slavinskaya, N. A.
    Abbasi, M.
    Starcke, J. H.
    Li, W.
    Frenklach, M.
    EURASIAN CHEMICO-TECHNOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 20 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [27] Uncertainty Quantification in Materials Modeling
    Andrew Dienstfrey
    Frederick R. Phelan
    Stephen Christensen
    Alejandro Strachan
    Fadil Santosa
    Ronald Boisvert
    JOM, 2014, 66 : 1342 - 1344
  • [28] Quantification of Epistemic Uncertainty in Grain Attachment Models for Equiaxed Solidification
    A. Plotkowski
    M. J. M. Krane
    Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2017, 48 : 1636 - 1651
  • [29] EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF FLOOR RESPONSES FOR A NUCLEAR REACTOR BUILDING
    Choi, Byunghyun
    Nishida, Akemi
    Li, Yinsheng
    Muramatsu, Ken
    Takada, Tsuyoshi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2018, VOL 2, 2018,
  • [30] On Second-Order Scoring Rules for Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification
    Bengs, Viktor
    Huellermeier, Eyke
    Waegeman, Willem
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 202, 2023, 202